“This is a mind virus.”

Yes it is. And if you find yourself dipping a toe in this fever swamp, step back. Touch grass. Touch snow.

24 Replies to ““This is a mind virus.””

  1. I agree with what Erica Kirk is saying, and many (all?) of the conservatives I follow on X who have commented on these past few days especially, with one glaring exception. agree with her.

    I don’t know where Candace Owens thinks her end game is with this, nor her follower count, or how she’s making out monetarily through this, but I’m done with her. She has far too much to walk back on if she ever does see the light. There’s literally thousands of others who source information on the news of the day who are able to replace her without turning into a garbage human being.
    Tim Pool is standing up for her (and himself) in a good way in this past week. I hope he continues to do so…

    related, with photo…
    https://x.com/KayaJones/status/1998975849849409645

    1. Candace Owens was always a grifter. Look up her history.
      Social Autopsy (failed doxxing site)
      RedPillBlack (pivot to the right when left wind money never appeared for doxing site)
      Daily Wire (fired for being nuts, many Daily Wire staff are anti funding of Israel and still work there)
      She married George Farmer (net worth 150 to 240 million) getting engaged in less than a month after meeting.

      Just a grifting attention whore.

      1. Definitely a grifter. One has to admit though, she did help in getting a fair amount of black males to convert to MAGA with her looks and convincing arguments. Damn shame she had to go full lunatic.

      2. By far the most important detail about George Farmer is that he is a Jesuit.

        Therefore he is a high-placed, well-connected liar and POS.

        1. George Farmer isn’t a Jesuit; he’d have to be in the priestly order for that, and he certainly isn’t a Catholic priest.
          He is however a convert, and his father is a rather influential Anglican.
          See what I did there?

          But back to George Farmer — he is reputed to be very close to Andrew Tate, not exactly the first person one thinks of any good Christian (Catholic, Orthodox, or Protestant) being chummy towards.

  2. Furry-friendly, communist homo, groomed by deep state feds – just like 2015 Garland, Texas shooting (Draw Mo contest). Obvious to a 2nd grader.

  3. Remember back when I said the Brigitte Macron thing was a stupid distraction, implying that Owens was a chaos agent?

    Yeah. I rest my case and told you so.

      1. Well then, judging from Ms. Owens’ behavior towards her admitted good friend’s family and organization, the descriptor suits.

        And what Ms. Owens is doing on the public stage is classic chaos agent behavior…straight from the old Soviet playbook (no, I’m not talking about present day Russia; I’m talking about a form of disinformation/redirection that was used quite extensively in the former Soviet Union).

        And yes, someone like Ms. Owens, who is a grifter, would be the perfect person to do something like this — for money and attention.

  4. Well robinson was not the lone shooter, as the swamp would have you believe. The plant , near Charlie’s stage, that shouted I shot him, was part of a ‘plot’.
    And than we had the BULLSHIT Kengay’s featured ***post***, it’s CRAP like that that the CIA books on for a distraction from the truth, so thanks for laying a part, the CIA/swamp is forever regretful!

  5. Yeah, no. Just more BS setting up agent Erika Kirk to potentially be the next VP of the US. Or at least the new Erika Kirk double.

    https://youtu.be/QKgHJsEWQbc?si=SoeNcDINLa3GD9_C

    Ole Dammegard does a great breakdown of this blatantly obvious false flag, as well as the players behind it. Sadly many on the right swallow this fake shooting narrative b/c they rightfully see those on the left as bat shit crazy, but fail to see how they’re being played.

  6. I don’t know about any of that (except Candace Owens being a nutcase), but I know what I saw on YouTube, and it doesn’t add up, sorry. I’m not a conspiracy guy…I’m a realist.

    You can tell the general public that Charlie Kirk was shot from 140 yards with a .30-06 and the bullet *did not exit* his neck, sure. Non-gunners will even believe you…but not those of us who have any experience with that particular cartridge. Try again.

    1. Charlie Kirk had NO blood on his white shirt. He didn’t drip a single drop on the ground as he was carried away to an SUV. No one carrying him had blood on them.

      For those who understand augmented reality, they can see this for what it is. And no, blood does not come out in purple’ish chunks.

      Anyone who spent any time reviewing this, whose research extended beyond MSM-approved images and video, can see this was a psy-op. Just the scene of a chair GOING THOUGH THE TABLE Charlie Kirk was sitting in should be enough to wake up all but the most brainwashed.

    2. Bill Hicks, aka Alex Jones, laughably asserted that the soft tissue in Charlie’s neck caused the bullet to change its trajectory within his body.

      Twice.

      And that’s why there was no exit wound.

      I’ve shot a 30-06, but those who haven’t might swallow that idiocy. The fact that anyone sane believes this contrived event demonstrates the power of propaganda.

      And for those who see it for what it is, it raises uncomfortable questions. Like who else had to be in on it. Which includes Saint Donald Trump, Kash Patel, and other CIA agents/actors propped up for us to worship.

      1. Wow…you (and Candace) got ’em.

        It was the aliens from Area 51…and the CIA (of course). Some people say Mossad, but all foreign intel agencies are really just CIA.
        Alien bullet tech is a marvelous thing by the way.

        1. Candace fully believes that Charlie died. I know he didn’t. She blames the Jews. I don’t. We have nothing in common.

          But sure, rush to lumping us together into aliens and other contrived fictions. I guess that allows you to carry on without doing any investigation of your own.

          It is amazing how many, especially here, see through the lies of the MSM and politicians. But when it comes to events covered breathlessly by the same MSM and politicians, they believe it.

          Astonishing.

          1. Of course you “know” he didn’t… you know nothing of the same. but of course only one side lies and shows doctored videos. I somehow forgot that you were right there and saw everything with your own eyes. The fact that anyone sane believes this contrived conspiracy demonstrates the power of internet “research” and propaganda. Be careful… you just might fall off the edge… if you can get through the ice wall and past the guards. Sorry you have to put up with these guys Kate.

    3. “shot from 140 yards with a .30-06 and the bullet *did not exit*”

      Glazer Safety Slug?
      Magsafe frangible?
      Home-loaded wildcat with a crazy pistol bullet on there?
      Black Talon hunting round that opened better than usual?
      Charlie Kirk leaning back in his chair for a long travel axis?
      Clipped the corned of a balistic plate on Charlie Kirk’s chest?
      Something the cops didn’t mention in the media briefing?

      There are a lot of possibilities.

      Also, not to mention, how do you know the bullet didn’t exit? I don’t know that. Was there an autopsy report made public? That’ll answer your questions.

      Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. The guy died, that’s enough for me. Let the cops sort out who did what, that’s their job. And with the President of the United States breathing down their necks, they’ll DO the job for a change.

      1. “Glazer Safety Slug?
        Magsafe frangible?
        Home-loaded wildcat with a crazy pistol bullet on there?
        Black Talon hunting round that opened better than usual?”

        No. The ER doctor recovered the bullet, and the FBI showed us pictures of the rounds that the shooter did not fire (with the writing on them, remember?). Standard .30-06.

        “Charlie Kirk leaning back in his chair for a long travel axis?’

        He wasn’t, though…and the height of the rooftop plus the fact that Charlie was under a tent limit the possible angle of the shot.

        “Clipped the corned of a balistic plate on Charlie Kirk’s chest?”

        He wasn’t wearing any. You could clearly see that through his t-shirt.

        “Something the cops didn’t mention in the media briefing?”

        Like what?

        “Also, not to mention, how do you know the bullet didn’t exit? I don’t know that.”

        I do…because the ER doctor recovered it “under the skin”.

        “Was there an autopsy report made public?

        That’ll answer your questions.”

        No, and THAT’S THE PROBLEM that I and others are having: there are legitimate questions that are not being answered.

        “Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. The guy died, that’s enough for me.”

        Not for me. When I see something that makes no logical sense I need an explanation.

        1. “The ER doctor recovered the bullet…”

          Dude. If the ER doc found the bullet in the patient, maybe that’s why there’s no exit wound? I’m just sayin’…

    1. Right? When exciting news gets views, and views get paid, guess what? The newsies will make up exciting “news”.

      None of it will be true, or constructive, but it’ll be -exciting-. Like Beverly Hills Housewives. All BS, all the time, except when a little truth gets in there by accident.

      You guys need to learn how to spot a psy-op. It isn’t like there will be less of them, going forward. If some hot chick on YouTube says the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, you should look out the window to make sure. It might be true -this time- but you never know.

      1. But the Candace assassination news is choice, come on…teams like the ones to take out Khashoggi (per Candace or her supporters, it starts to become a blur after a while, but a hilarious blur!).
        Now there’s a name from the past by the way — the rabbit hole! the rabbit hole!!! (TM)

Navigation