A new Canadian bill introduced by the Liberal government of Prime Minister Mark Carney has raised privacy concerns as it appears that, should it become law, it would give officials the power to ban anyone deemed a dissident from accessing the internet.
Bill C-8, which is now in its second reading in the House of Commons, was introduced in June by Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree and has a provision in which the federal government could stop “any specified person” from accessing the internet.
All that would be needed is the O.K. from Minister of Industry Mélanie Joly for an individual to be denied internet service.
The bill is titled “An Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts,” and it contains a clause that mandates all internet providers to pull internet services from anyone whom the government demands.
The bill would allow the industry minister to “prohibit a telecommunications service provider from providing any service to any specified person,” all without a warrant. The only recourse a banned person would have is after the order is given. They would have to get a federal court to look at the ban order for a judicial review.
aaaaaaaaaand lookit howe maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaany VOTE fer itttttt.
because they DEMAND censorshit DEMAND tyranny and daz whut dey gots
Makes sense, Marx Carnage is essentially a Socialist EU-style + good buddy-buddy w Tony Blair and all-Labour UK. And there’s also this:
https://www.steynonline.com/15626/the-masters-plan
So Yeah, he’s probably even more into this crap than Blackie.
The “Elbows Up!” retards are giddy with glee. Kanadians will no longer have to think. Their god the government will do the thinking for them.
It looks like soon Canadians will have to report outside to the nearest park for early morning exercises followed by goose-stepping around the park for half a hour.
The editor of Lifesite recently visited Russia: https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/they-treat-children-like-gold-catholic-father-explains-why-his-family-moved-to-russia/
When they start the great cancelling how long will it take before they start taking out one of their own?
During the French Revolution even Robespierre didn’t escape the guillotine.
Just a bit downstream from the “Mischief” convictions.
Not just in Canada; here’s a global view of what’s going on from Telegram’s Pavel Durov:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/10/11/telegram-founder-pavel-durov-warns-about-losing-free-speech-battle/
And listen what Trump pal Oracle’s Larry Ellison says about citizens having to be on their best behavior:
https://x.com/Artemisfornow/status/1972280176638890125
“What the Larry Ellison (Oracle) mindset believes, is that social opinions and ultimately public policy can be changed simply by controlling the information inputs. This was the long-game strategy behind Larry Ellison’s likeminded fellow travelers taking action to acquire TikTok, and his son David Ellison simultaneously taking control of Paramount (CBS).”
–Sundance from the first link
How would such a fascist law prevent one of the deemed internet-banned “dissidents” (what they used to call free thinkers in the USSR) from taking an alt-registered lap top to an internet cafe or other public WIFI? I sense a boondoggle for enforcement that would easily eclipse the growth of the gun registry. Perhaps they might make mandatory the activation and full time use of built-in cameras to monitor all internet users with facial recognition. Between that and CBDCs, they will have achieved the ultimate authoritarian state. Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Castro, and millions of their ilk would be envious of the Carney’s Canada – an inevitable product of 21st century end stage democracy .
no kidding. its all done in someone else’s name.
all of it. no facial recognition for security and the print scanner is painted over.
aka a run-of-the-mill PSEUDONYM. authors do. it celebs do it.
thus pointing out the naiveté of this typical liberalism, depending on a grossly compliant public. (thats why it works kritter, thats the whole liberal approach)
L – Suppose the Carney regime orders the suspension of internet service for Alberta and Saskatchewan. Then only remove people from that list, who score high enough on said government’s (C.C.P. supplied) Canadian Serf Social Credit Score?
A X- Star Link satellite dish with the server located across the U.S. border is beginning to look like Radio Free America did to those living in behind the Iron Curtain in the Soviet Union.
I will not comply, the political left are desperate to silence the right because they can’t debate or rebutt us. I will not comply, I am watching Europe burn as the Islamists and leftists’ unite in hatred of Jews, and it sickens me that it is happening here. They want to silence us using the power of a corrupt state, they can’t silence us because if they shut off the internet we turn to paper. Do not comply.
the huge resources wasted when east germany did this. the fear, turning kids into rats for the state and ‘rewarding’ them ‘somehow’. curious how the lilt is towards communistic measures on the heels of the #1 politician declaring its “admiration” when THIS is also something unreserved powah gives
Just one more reason to revolt against the Forever Party rather than protest.
You just can’t keep referring to them as The Government.
Within a free society, they’re actions are antithetical to legitimacy.
Imagine walking into a company’s office with a hand written resume because your printer only connects via wi-fi and being unable to email or log onto a hiring site like Indeed, or better yet, having to write a letter to your bank declaring that “there’s been an error” …
The potential is madness. It could be like being old school “shunned” and being unable to access normal life in Canada, by the whim of a minister of the crown. Even WITH a judicial order to stop posting whatever the gov’t finds so offensive, it would be comparable to being removed from society.
If this isn’t unconstitutional, why have a constitution?
THERE WILL BE SCREWUPS. and utterly NO REMEDY built in. nothing. years of misery, the sheeple all chiming in reinforcing the official narrative ‘yawell yawell yawell y mussa dun sumpin rong rong rong !!!!! this is the ‘unintended consequence of voting LIEberal
I’m reminded of a quip by the great Canadian humorist Stephen Leacock:
“I am sitting in the smallest room in my house. I have your review in front of me. Very soon it will be behind me.”
I envision this being used in conjunction with de-banking to help suppress any future trucker-style incidents. What better way to quell info sharing and if said banned person does use a burner phone (or someone else’s) then they have put themselves into a breach/arrest position.
The left is terrified their power is slipping.
Dissident: anyone who is not a card carrying Liberal.