Safe and Effective®

Safe and Effective 44 Comments

1. “It’s not happening.”

2. “It’s happening, but only a little bit.” <-- you are here

3. “It’s happening, but it’s a good thing.”

44 Replies to “Safe and Effective®”

  1. Those behind the Coronahoax will never admit the millions disabled, dead, and dying caused solely by the clot shots.

    If we lived in a just and sane world, Fauci et al would long ago have been executed, speech on the topic wouldn’t be censored, pharmaceutical companies would have been sued into bankruptcy, their boards would be serving consecutive life sentences, and investigations would be ongoing into who else profited from this lie.

  2. I have come to the conclusion the government doesn’t care, the industrial medical complex doesn’t care and our entire healthcare industry is compromised via big pharma. We will never know how many have died or will die because of the vaccine and the political left are fine with the suffering they have caused or will cause. You can’t get the vaccine fanatics to admit that they did anything wrong-we never will convince them of their liability or cruelty.

    1. Chilling and sad observation, but likely very accurate. I don’t think we’ll get to #3 though – it’s good it’s happening.
      Trump has done remarkable work in just 6 months with his priorities, border, illegals and trade. He still has 3 1/2 years left, I believe he will pursue the fake elections and the fake pandemic.

    2. Japan Releases Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Data on 18 Million People
      The data speaks for itself—and the 3 to 4 month spike is impossible to ignore.
      >
      > A COVID vaccine database covering 18 million citizens has just been released for the first time.
      >
      > After reviewing the data, a top professor warned: “The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die.”
      >
      > The most terrifying finding was a deadly spike just 3 to 4 months after the final shot.
      https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/japan-releases-bombshell-vax-vs-unvax

      COVID Vaccine “Safe and Effective” Narrative Collapses on Camera
      This is the Senate hearing they never wanted you to see.
      >
      > The “safe and effective” narrative collapsed on camera during Senator Ron Johnson’s explosive Senate hearing on COVID-19 vaccine injuries Wednesday afternoon.
      >
      > Senator Ron Johnson brought the receipts, exposing how the Biden administration DELIBERATELY hid vaccine harms from the public.
      https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/covid-vaccine-safe-and-effective

      1. 1. This report is not formally published anywhere. It’s just a broadcast.
        2. The data it’s based on is not from any established source, but was collected by the group itself. Very little is known about how they collected it.
        3. The number of deaths decrease with an increase in number of COVID shots, which makes no sense given their claims.

        In short, this group needs to be far more transparent about their methods, and they must subject their findings to the scientific community. It’s the very essence of the scientific method that studies be transparent, thoroughly documented, and repeatable.

    3. I personally am so very sad. My senior group lost three people in the last month. One developed two completely separate and different types of cancer already and at stage 4. Another senior who had been healthy and active his entire life developed sudden onset type 1 diabetes. Complications of that resulted in multiple amputations and infections in his feet the last one fatal. Another just died in his sleep, no explanation. All three were in their early 70s and good faithful followers of public health and trusted their advice and protected themselves and others with the vaccine and the boosters. 6 to 8 each.

  3. ” … have strong potential to influence public confidence in vaccines.”

    Aye. But it hasn’t shaken the electorate’s faith in the uniparty that poisoned them.

    1. It’s not faith, it is fear, of the kind only felt by true cowards. Losing faith in the uniparty would require taking responsibility for your situation, infantilized coward Canadians can’t handle that. Look how they maintain in a failed healthcare system, because the alternative is scary if you are childish and weak. Shithole.

  4. One of the biggest mass murderers in North America, and she is up for the Order of Canada. Dr. Bonnie Henry and others of her ilk do not deserve the Order of Canada, they belong in prison for their crimes against humanity. Never forget.

  5. It seems to me that if the budget is exceeded for paying settlements on poor outcomes for forced vaxes, the easiest solution would be to simply take those funds paid out for employing those who were responsible for overseeing the project, and their enablers in the House, the Senate, the PMO, the RCMP, The OPP/QPP and various police forces and health officials across the tier 2 nation. Include their pensions with this.

    Yes, it may be painful, but think of the country.

    1. Don’t forget the media. Our Canadian presstitutes were front and centre throughout.

  6. A problem with vaccine injury compensation programs is determining cause. Vaccines do not prevent strokes, heart attacks, cancers, or a thousand other ailments that afflict us. Given how widespread vaccines are administered, some of these are going to occur shortly after vaccination even if the vaccine is a harmless saline.

    So how does one determine if a medical condition was caused by a vaccine in a specific case?

    1. “Vaccines do not prevent strokes, heart attacks, cancers, or a thousand other ailments that afflict us.”

      No, but the mRNA shots cause many more of them. That’s why compensation programs have been set up, not just in Canada but in other countries as well.

      2. The vaccines do sometimes cause myocarditis, especially in younger people. There is no sound evidence that mRNA vaccines cause cancer, heart attacks, or strokes. Here is a paper that studied the risk of stroke:

        https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040430

        But even an mRNA vaccine did sometimes did cause strokes, it’s moot. The question is how do you establish cause IN A SPECIFIC CASE, because that’s what is needed in a vaccine injury compensation program.

        1. The M’Fers should pay with their lives, not for vaccine harms, but for forcing vaccines. My daughter was force vaxxed at the U of Ottawa, very much against her will. She suffered no obvious deleterious effects, her fiancee did suffer myocarditus. If, God forbid she had been seriously harmed by the vax, I was fully prepared to visit serious harm on whoever the president of that institution loved most before I killed him with my bare hands. Our garbage healthcare system already took my beloved wife, she is the only thing left I care about.

    2. Big Pharma should pay you big money for that paragraph, Mr. Killer Diller Marmot.

      1. So far as I know, vaccine injury compensation programs are government initiatives, and are not paid for by the pharmaceutical companies.

        But you know, thanks for playing.

        1. You are such a clever marmot, and you’re right.
          Big pharma makes government pay, as owners do.
          But, you know, thanks for trolling.

          1. And thanks for the personal attacks. It always adds to the discussion.

    3. All those excess deaths are a clue. So would be an honest comparison of jabbed versus unjabbed but Canada won’t do it. They are hiding behind their abominable 14 day rule (21 days in Sask and BC) and their 28 day rule. And they won’t throw the data open to allow independent researchers to confirm these wild claims. The other thing that really helps their case is any doctor stupid enough to dare to blame the vaccines risked their medical license. That dramatically reduced the cases of vaccine injury.

      Lie number 1# “The largest public immunization in Canadian history reduced the spread of deadly disease” The vaccine did not reduce or prevent transmission. “saving the lives of thousands of Canadians by mitigating the effects of the virus and reducing emergency room admissions.” More lies based on a faulty reading of the data taking into account their blood soaked hands rule about how to count someone as vaccinated, making reporting a vaccine injury dangerous for a doctor’s license and their present current very deliberate delays in reporting excess death, combined with extreme censorship. “For most, vaccines slowly brought life back to normal.” No, the government made our lives a living hell with lockdowns, travel restrictions, constant fear mongering, idiotic nonsensical interventions like arrows on the grocery store floor and cloth masks that don’t stop anything. None of that had anything to do with the virus. Then the government allowed us to return to our normal lives after injecting most of us with a worthless, expensive and damaging experimental gene therapy.

      1. Oh there is this lie too. “The government reassured the public that serious side effects were possible, but rare.”

        I never heard that, not even once. All I ever heard was a chorus of safe and effective followed by garbage nonsense like “It stays in your arm.”

        1. Or even this dilly by the Fat Jason Kenney government. “Vaccines are tested over and over until they are proven safe.”
          A false statement in its very construction making the gullible to assume “before being used”. The regulations in Canada were rewritten to approve the mRNA gene therapy for forced use on people with very little testing let alone proving it was safe.

      2. Even if vaccines do sometimes cause injury (which they do), how do you differentiate those events from medical events that simply happened after vaccination but were not caused by it?

        That is the crux of my concern. If you don’t wish to address that question, please don’t respond.

        1. I will address your ‘question,’ which is not a question but rather a rationalization.
          The crux of the bisquit is the apostrophe, as Zappa said.
          In short, when vaccines cause an alarming spike in injuries, differential difficulties that “simply happened’ become the defense of the indefensible.
          Offer proof that those events ‘simply happened’ seeing as you can cite the appropriate authorities.
          I say this on behalf of injured people that I know of.
          Cite another peer reviewed paper to justify your ‘concern.’
          PS… your parentheses (which they do) is a tell, marbot.

        2. You address it by saying “We are very sorry this happened. Since we mandated and thereby coerced the public to get this vaccine without providing informed consent, we accept responsibility for all claims of vaccine injury. Further, every individual involved in the mandating, coercion, administration and enforcement of said coercion and lack of true informed consent will be held personally responsible and face financial compensation demands and criminal charges for their malfeasance, including charges of crimes against humanity. Further, legislation will be introduced to make it impossible for this to ever happen again.”

          That would satisfy me. Instead we gave Theresa Tam and Bonnie Henry the Order of Canada.

          1. How do you differentiate between injuries caused by vaccines and ailments that occurred AFTER vaccination, but were not caused by them?

            The question is not that difficult to understand.

          2. I just answered you. You assume all of them, anyone who makes a remotely plausible claim, given people were coerced and tricked and not given full informed consent.

            Might cost Pfizer and company a percentage of the profits made.

          3. You didn’t answer my question of how to differentiate between true vaccine injuries and ailments that simply occurred after vaccination.

            And I understand why. It would seem to be extraordinarily difficult except in rare cases.

          4. KM
            I have suffered more migraines since taking the forced gene therapy shot. The first was immediately after the second dose.
            If a study finds that medical episodes have increased in vaxed individuals but not in those who are unvaccinated then it stands to reason the gene therapy shot is a factor.

            It comes to this: Does smoking really cause cancer since non-smokers also get cancer?

          5. If a study finds that medical episodes have increased in vaxed individuals but not in those who are unvaccinated then it stands to reason the gene therapy shot is a factor.

            Sure. But what it doesn’t do is identify those SPECIFIC CASES that were caused by the vaccines. And that’s what you need to know for a vaccine injury compensation program.

        3. I’ve got it. Test for spike. We know the spike protein is pathogenic. We can test for the difference between vaccine induced spike protein and natural infection. We know spike persists for years in some individuals. Therefore, we test for the presence of vaccine induced spike protein whenever someone has a suspected adverse reaction. If spike is present, then it is a legitimate vaccine injury. For those injured in the past like Sean Hartman, where spike was detected in post mortum examinations of his heart it’s obviously caused by the jab. For those who were injured in the past but no longer producing spike, a time association would have to be used.

          1. I see two problems with that:

            1. The COVID protein doesn’t seem to persist for more than a few weeks. Then it falls to undetectable levels:

            https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/74/4/715/6279075

            I admit this study has a small sample size.

            2. You would have to establish a very strong correlation between serious adverse effects and the persistence of the spike protein. Is there a study that does this?

          4. Interesting. It appears that spike proteins do persist in some people. My cited study may have missed it because it’s rare.

            Do you know what else injects COVID spike protein into the blood? COVID itself, and at a rate far greater than the vaccines. This leads the first paper to speculatate whether post-vaccination syndrome and long COVID are the same phenomenon; namely the inability to clear the body of spike proteins. The third paper is ONLY about spike proteins from the disease itself, and also speculates that this is behind (certain types of) long COVID.

            The detection of COVID spike proteins in the body still would not likely be a great way to determine if someone deserves vaccine injury compensation, as — according to your second paper — it’s rare, and might only represent a small minority of injuries. It might also be difficult determining if the spike protein was from the vaccine or COVID itself, as most people did contract COVID, some without knowing it.

          5. You missed the part where it is possible to determine whether the spike persisting is the vaccine or the virus I am guessing. And yes it might miss some but the sickest poeople have the highest level of spike.

          6. I didn’t say it was impossible. I said it might not be easy, especially if it needs to be done on an industrial scale.

    1. That’d be great, if one could actually be satisfied that the pricks pushing this shit got the shots, too. I’m not convinced. As a child/young adult I had hundreds of shots for hay fever, therefor I’m somewhat familiar w/ injection methodology. Watching Blackie get his didn’t look like any injection I ever got. I’d bet $$$ to dognuts all these bastards in power got nothing more than saline.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation