Their Inner Loveliness

One might think that gangs of masked misfits following elderly and disabled people to their cars, then obstructing their attempts to leave, while generally menacing them and muttering vivid threats, might constitute a breach of the peace, to say the least. Causing fear and alarm is the obvious intention.

And remember, the targets in the videos above – the unimposing, the elderly, the disabled – are chosen deliberately and with glee. Because that’s who they are, these mighty warriors of the Cluster B Tendency. Malevolence is their aphrodisiac, their euphoria. It’s how they feel important. It’s how they process the buzzing noise inside their own heads.

A peek at the psychology of Antifa’s Transgender Enforcement Wing, for whom menacing the elderly and disabled is the cutting edge of radical piety.

15 Replies to “Their Inner Loveliness”

  1. Knowing the law can go a long way.

    Obviously, the videos show a crime reflecting the actual letter of the law. I pasted the applicable violation below. Now, the interesting part. In the video, the police are actually escorting the stalking victims to their car, while the ANTIFA goons intentionally follow, harass, and attempt to contact. In Washington State the law says that a private citizen can detain someone they witness committing a misdemeanor or felony.

    So, that elderly couple should just stop on the sidewalk and turn to the police officers and say, “I’m making a citizen’s arrest for stalking. You should probably help me detain these people. And, I will expect you to be witnesses. Now, the police have to make a decision. They can let an elderly person attempt to subdue four young hoods, or they can diffuse the situation by making the arrest. Their call. 😀

    ____________________________________
    WASH ST RCW 9A.46.110
    Stalking.
    (1)(a) A person commits the crime of stalking if, without lawful authority the person:
    (i) Intentionally and repeatedly harasses another person;
    (ii) Intentionally and repeatedly follows another person;
    (iii) Intentionally contacts, follows, tracks, or monitors, or attempts to contact, follow, track, or monitor another person after being given actual notice that the person does not want to be contacted, followed, tracked, or monitored;

      1. Depends if they’re armed elderly citizens or not.

        Thirty foot rule, ladies and gentlemen. Inside thirty feet, a kn1fe or a club is as dangerous as a f1rearm. Maybe more, depending who’s swinging it. If they’re harassing you from inside your 30 foot circle, you have a big problem.

        Particularly when one of them is Gronk the Giant, that guy would take some deterrence. Even though he walks like a kid that plays D&D all day in his mom’s basement.

        As to the courts? Supporting an elderly citizen who defended himself from a politically motivated swarming attack by multiple assailants? Not a chance! Old guy goes to Crowbar Hotel for sure, even if there’s video of them trying to unalive him with a bat or a f1rearm.

        Does anyone still think this isn’t a government policy? Come on, you guys. It’s been 20 years now. Wake up and smell the Pantifa.

  2. One day, a group of harassers like this, might all die from lead poisoning.
    The group is not taking into account, that old people have a short amount of time left on this earth, often they have aliments like cancer, which makes them less concerned about their last days.
    For the right one, spreading a little lead poisoning around, wouldn’t be such a big deal.

    1. “Gran Torino” staring Clint Eastwood is an excellent film along similar lines.

    2. You can buy a T shirt that says:

      Don’t f**k with me. I am old enough that life in prison isn’t much of a deterrent”

      1. heh heh.
        lve voiced the thought some time now, what if a new unwritten social rule came about those who are lucid and mobile but saddled with a say 6 month prognosis, took it upon themselves to track down and kill some of the more seemy members of society? p.s. NO ONE is ‘immune’. no one. take a public vote, rat them out when they hide and kill the lot of them.

  3. I am 77 years of age. I live in a state where concealed carry and stand your ground laws are the law of the land. Antifa and other rat bastard commie pinko groups and their antics are not tolerated by civilized people. I have mentioned before that vigilantes are back in use. When law enforcement cannot or will not protect the public from predators, there are sheep dogs that will. FAFO.

  4. Google “Antifa mug shots” images and try to tell me with a straight face these people aren’t demonically possessed. Trump, Bondi, Patel need to go after these people like they’re Al Quaeda.

    1. A majority of this craziness would not exist if the idea of mental institutions where people could be held involuntarily to protect the public from them hadn’t fallen out of favor.

      1. Phil. Buddy. None of this would be happening if it wasn’t being arranged by government.

        Everything they’re doing is illegal. Merely showing up all in black with masks is -illegal-. They can all be arrested and detained for 24 hours just for the face masks and the harassment of police alone.

        But they’re -not- being arrested and detained. Because some government body WANTS THEM TO DO IT.

        So the smart thing to do is find out who runs that institution, and see that their budget gets zeroed as soon as possible.

        Precisely the opposite of what just happened in our federal election, which tells you how stupid the people who live here are.

  5. …then obstructing their attempts to leave…

    To have one of these bastards get in front of my pickup truck ’tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish’d…

    1. I’ve always fantasized about being stuck on an interstate – preferably driving a cement truck – because of some left wing protest, and then, well, I think you get the picture 😉

    2. Why are those highway protestors not simply arrested for illegally detaining the people they are holding up in traffic?

      If they physically grabbed and held a pedestrian and kept them from leaving they wouldn’t get away with it, why are they allowed to do it with motorists?

      1. “Why are those highway protestors not simply arrested…”

        Because the cops are ordered not to arrest them. The cops are there to protect the protesters, not the motorists. That’s what is happening. All over the civilized world, this is what’s being done.

        Next question, who ordered that? That’s the right question. The job is to find that guy and see that he’s out on his backside, selling pencils on Main Street the next morning.

Navigation