Playing Both Sides?

11 Replies to “Playing Both Sides?”

1. He has yet to articulate what those solutions might be.

   _________________________________

   The hell he hasn’t. He gifted $25 Billion to modular home builders, then initiated legislation to destroy residential appliances in the name of “climate change.” His strategy is simple. Remove the carbon tax and legislate those costs into everyday living many times over. Carney said it himself. “I think one can always look for better solutions, and as a country, we should always be open to better solutions for that.”

   Carney said the carbon tax was too divisive. What he means, it that it was too obvious. It became a political football because it could not be disguised as something else. Well, there are going to be a lot of these tag along “quality of life” pieces of legislation in the future. Only the most resolute, and in tune observer will understand that he’s taking the carbon tax out of the equation and massively increasing mandatory contributions from Canadians disguised as something else.

2. If he gets power, the real Mark Carbon will show us all…and stack us up like cordwood then compost us if we don’t comply.
   Probably all ready to start up each Canadian’s Social Credit Score and Carbon Output Account.
   Tie in your digital bank account and your health care access.
   And your MAID eligibility.

   1. 30 or even as recent as 10 years ago the response is ‘get serious’.
      that was before bank accounts were locked down to ‘show who is boss’
      and MAiD. no need to articulate anything there.
      etc etc.
      now its all to plausible. and given it all translates into powah for Lieberals,
      can l use the words ‘likely in some form’?

3. heeeeeeey G&M, todays skill testing Q: given the bad publicity Carnage is getting, are you hedging your bets? you know, a shockingly rare negative story? in case the predicted Lieberal win doesnt pan out despite all the shenanigans?

4. Liars at the Grope and Flail are giving Crooked Carbon Tax Carnage the credit for what Jim Flaherty accomplished in the first paragraph. I stopped reading at that point.

5. It’s always been in 25 years if we don’t do something we’ll be in real trouble. My grandkids weren’t supposed to ever see snow, they said 25 years ago. The oceans will rise by 2015, they said 25 years ago. And now of we don’t do something we’ll be in real trouble in 25 years. And they expect us to just keep believing that they know what they’re saying.

6. Adding a carbon tax to production of aluminum and steel can only help with tariffs right?

7. “However, the re-election of Mr. Trump, a noted climate-change denier, ”

   That’s where I stopped reading, right there. Typical Globe&Mail BS…there is no such thing as a “climate -change denier” (unless they are hiding out somewhere with the flat-earthers and gravity-deniers).

8. If elected, Mark Carnage will bring back the consumer carbon tax, only it will be called a levy.

9. It’s unfortunate that Maxine Bernier has no chance to win. I’d vote for him again if I wasn’t scared shiteless that we end up with another liberal government.

   1. “It’s unfortunate that Maxine Bernier has no chance to win. I’d vote for him again if I wasn’t scared shiteless that we end up with another liberal government.”

      The CPC counts on scaring you into doing that….that’s why they don’t have to change their policies to actual conservative ones. The Liberals do the same thing to NDP voters, giving them dire warnings that if they don’t vote Liberal the CPC will win.

      The Liberals laugh at the NDP voters they have suckered into voting for them, while the CPC laughs at how easy it is to manipulate you into voting for them.