98 Replies to “February 14, 2025: Reader Tips”

  1. Hey Primerose Path experts, care to explain this one?

    Vance Wields Threat of Sanctions, Military Action to Push Putin Into Ukraine Deal
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/vance-wields-threat-of-sanctions-military-action-to-push-putin-into-ukraine-deal/ar-AA1z1vhr

    “Vice President JD Vance said Thursday that the U.S. would hit Moscow with sanctions and potentially military action if Russian President Vladimir Putin won’t agree to a peace deal with Ukraine that guarantees Kyiv’s long-term independence.”

    Let the pretzel logic begin.

    I seem to recall that “we have 60 days of nuclear poker left”.

      1. Well given that you are inconsequential and accidental what you care about really does not matter.

        1. I care that you care to issue some vapid retort. Because it makes me laugh. Every time. Good job you self-owning putz.

    1. “Hey Primerose Path experts, care to explain this one?
      Vance Wields Threat of Sanctions, Military Action to Push Putin Into Ukraine Deal”

      You need someone to explain political posturing to you? Seriously?

      ““Vice President JD Vance said Thursday that the U.S. would hit Moscow with sanctions and potentially military action if Russian President Vladimir Putin won’t agree to a peace deal with Ukraine that guarantees Kyiv’s long-term independence.”

      [sigh]…

      Okay, I’ll give you a really short explanation, one that I hope you, PJF and even AllanS can understand.

      (Ready? Pay attention, now…I’m only going to say this once…)

      It’s like this, Jessica: President Trump has already set the deal in motion; JD Vance isn’t actually involved in it. Everyone knows that Russia will keep most (or ALL) of the territory they have won so far, but for those people like you who will whine about “capitulation” and “selling out” the Ukrainians, the US Vice President was trotted out to issue some ‘tough talk’ to mollify you. Since Putin already has everything he needs for his ‘buffer zone’, it won’t change the deal AT ALL, but it should fool the Useful Idiots into thinking that they have ‘won’ something.

      So, did it work? Do you feel like you have ‘won’ something?

      1. “You need someone to explain political posturing to you? Seriously?”

        Wait, so is it posturing or a misrepresentation? Make up your mind.

        “JD Vance isn’t actually involved in it. ”

        Of course they just keep the VP out of the loop, because he is only a VP.

        “Since Putin already has everything he needs for his ‘buffer zone’, it won’t change the ”

        Which of Pootin’s demands from winter 2021-22 have been satisfied?

        1. Demands are one thing, settling for what you can get are another now that Trump has entered the arena.

          1. So you’re saying that Pootin is not going to get his demands? The same demands he started the war over? Someone needs to update your processor.

        2. ““Since Putin already has everything he needs for his ‘buffer zone’, it won’t change the ”

          Which of Pootin’s demands from winter 2021-22 have been satisfied?”

          Do I also need to explain ‘buffer zone’ to you? Good lord you are thick…

          1. There was nothing about a buffer zone in Ukraine in Pootin’s winter 21-22 demands. Are you familiar with what the demands were?

    2. So only dumb and dumber responded? I was actually hoping for someone with brains.

      https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/02/14/wsj-mischaracterizes-vance-comments-on-russia-ahead-of-munich/
      The expanded quotes reveal VP Vance told the WSJ that: “there are instruments of pressure, absolutely and again, if you look at President Trump’s approach to this, the range of options is extremely broad, and there are economic tools of leverage. There, of course, military tools of leverage. There’s a whole host of things that we could do. But fundamentally, I think the President wants to have a productive negotiation, both with Putin and with Zelensky.”

    1. Sure, Visegrad can differentiate between a Russian drone and a Ukrainian one. It’s just their claim without any proof. Nice try though.

      After all, why would Russia attack the station considering it would undermine any good will it would hope to establish with Trump leading up to the negotiations.

      Never mind, I know your answer: orks gotta ork.

      1. Visegrad does not have to differentiate, Visegrad reports. Russian drones are tracked by radar. Yes it was a russian drone.

        “…why would Russia attack …”

        As a warning/reminder to US, that they are nothing more than a rabid ape with a straight razor. Part of negotiations when you’re a terrorist state it is to up the ante by doing violent psychotic things.

        “orks gotta ork.”

        Yes, that summarizes them accurately. It is probably the smartest thing you have ever said. Did they update your processor as I have suggested?

          1. It doesn’t matter what orks are saying (or what a bot like you is regurgitating). They did it like they hit the other plant early in the war and then denied responsibility. Or like they blew up the Dnipro dam, standard subhuman ork MO. Just another reason why a good ork is dead ork.

      2. “After all, why would Russia attack the station considering it would undermine any good will it would hope to establish with Trump leading up to the negotiations.”

        An excellent question. Reminds me of, “why would Russia blow up their own pipeline?”

        The answer, of course, is that they wouldn’t. That would be stupid.

        1. “An excellent question. ”

          Only if you’re a moron, which in your case, makes it an excellent question.

          1. “Only if you’re a moron, which in your case, makes it an excellent question.”

            Says the gurl who tries to call me out on arguments actually made by someone else.

          2. WTF are you mumbling abut this time? Never mind I don’t want to know. I am sure it sounded clever in your head.

  2. Can this site please stop posting pictures of Trudeau. At least 20% of the Canadian population never wants to see his face. Dump all of those “stock photos”, possibly replacing his mug with pictures of Parliament buildings.

    By the way, the man has not resigned yet, as most Canadians believe. He only resigned as leader of the Liberal Party. He never resigned as Prime Minister nor as an MP. He is happy skiing in Whistler and eeking out is last days by taking useless trips abroad to the Caribbean, South Africa and Paris, all on the taxpayer dimes.

    The Liberals may be slow to move on letting Carney take his place. So, Parliament is hamstrung and pro-rogued. Singh is hopeless and will not vote to call an election until “free” dental is passed.

  3. Laura R-C takes on the cowards and collaborators who want the whole Wuhan flu tyranny swept under the rug.

    “I’ve also included a couple of Covid-related links down below. And I’m not sure there will ever be a time where it won’t be included. That is because there has not been any kind of serious moral reckoning about the abject evil that was inflicted upon us, body and soul. There cannot be any forgiveness without repentance. There cannot be any forgetting. There needs to still be criminal charges. No, we cannot ‘get over it’ because we are actually still going through it. This profound evil is still going on now. This is unforgivable evil still being perpetuated against humans by humans ”

    https://www.steynonline.com/15027/no-forgiveness-without-repentance

  4. It is no different than in Canada. For several decades Canadian politicians of all parties as well as bureaucrats have been blatantly ignoring that section of the our Immigration Act that specifically ban from entry to Canada (not just for immigration purposes but any entry) those who may be an undue burden on Canada’s healthcare system.

    Skyrocketing healthcare budget for illegal immigrants haunts blue state taxpayers
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/skyrocketing-healthcare-budget-illegal-immigrants-haunts-blue-state-taxpayers

  5. What’s going on at Justice? Mass resignations over Bondi’s order to drop the charges against Dem Eric Adams. This doesn’t look good.

    Trump is screwing around wasting time with threats instead of tending to his knitting. The courts are brimming with challenges to his every move – many successful.

    The debt ceiling is looming. Trump wants to increase it by 4T. He doesn’t have the votes. A government shutdown will be on him.

    1. The liberal court challenges are un-constitutional and will be summarily removed. Inferior courts that believe they have the authority to block the executive branch at its highest level are simply ignorant and acting out of political malice.
      As to the resignations, the charges against Adams were brought by politically motivated operatives at the DOJ after the Biden (remember him?) administration became upset because Adams was voicing his issues with mass illegal immigration. They were punishing him for breaking ranks. Those who brought the charges are well gone from the DOJ and won’t be missed. BTW, how hard do you think it is to find lawyers to hire to replace them?

      Some of us would welcome a government shutdown. It’s not really a shutdown as essential services remain, and the government that operates during a shutdown is about as much government as we actually need and can afford to operate. It’s critical to remember that an estimated 50% of new job positions filled over the last 4 years are taxpayer supported, ie. government jobs or foundation or NGO jobs. All parasites. Each and every one.

      1. The prosecutor who quit was conservative attorney Danielle Sassoon. She used to work for SC judge Antonin Scalia. A very conservative judge who was replaced by Neil Gorsuch. She quit because her ethics wouldn’t abide what was taking place. Conservatives do things like that.

    2. BTW, some of the judges that have so willfully misinterpreted the Constitution are in for some hard scrutiny. Pam Bondi is already suggesting, and congress complying, with actions to impeach them.

      Perhaps most heinous is the judge who ruled that the Secretary of the Treasury, appointed by Trump and confirmed by Congress was not permitted to access the records at Treasury, because he is in an appointed position. It is outright politically motivated insanity.

    3. This kind of action is just beginning, and sadly it is what is necessary to get our political house in order. Criminal charges against AOC would be delightful and she has clearly earned them, as have a bunch of city government employees. Trump is not FKKKing around.

    4. “What’s going on at Justice? Mass resignations over Bondi’s order to drop the charges against Dem Eric Adams. This doesn’t look good.”

      It looks just fine to the majority of Americans. Trump won the election….your preferred candidate (Kamala Harris) lost.

        1. “Fred
          Check back to my comments on kameltoe….and maybe repost.”

          Your attempts at misdirection (and pretending to be conservative) don’t interest me enough to bother.

          1. If my comments dont interest you fred why bother commenting on my posts then?

            Oh , and yes we must follow the party line. Criticism is not tolerated.

  6. It is no different than in Canada. For several decades Canadian politicians of all parties as well as bureaucrats have been blatantly ignoring that section of the our Immigration Act that specifically ban from entry to Canada (not just for immigration purposes but any entry) those who may be an undue burden on Canada’s healthcare system.

    Skyrocketing healthcare budget for illegal immigrants haunts blue state taxpayers
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/skyrocketing-healthcare-budget-illegal-immigrants-haunts-blue-state-taxpayers

    .
    Fox News Poll: Two-thirds favor deporting immigrants who live in U.S. illegally
    https://www.foxnews.com/official-polls/fox-news-poll-two-thirds-favor-deporting-immigrants-who-live-u-s-illegally

  7. Vice President JD Vance Delivers Remarks at the Munich Security Conference

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCOsgfINdKg

    Well spoken and to the point. You can see some of the more dicktatorial (sic) in the audience not liking it.
    BBC commented and said nothing of what Vance said, instead they said stuff that he did not.
    After all BBC are the experts on misinformation.

    1. G7 should be USA, China, Germany, Japan, India, UK, France.
      G10 would add Italy, Canada, Brazil.

      Without China and India, it’s just a club. That is why BRICS exists. I would add China, India, Brazil and Russia. Then they wouldn’t be in a rush to start their own currency.

      1. I agree Canada isn’t a legit G7 country. CA as a State has a larger economy.

        If I were Canada and Trump promotes Putin I would leave the G7. The next meeting is June in Kananaskis (it’s in Alberta) could be the end of G7.

Navigation