I, Napoleon

19 Replies to “I, Napoleon”

1. One of the most important byproducts of this move will be to uncover the proponents of allowing “Transgenders” in the military to start with, and encouraging that focus. We already know one of them, Elizabeth Warren. Whoever makes the most noise about this was responsible for the “woke” influence.

   Peter Hegseth made a very valid point in one of his interviews. The military’s shifting towards “woke” culture was reactionary to the whim of politicians. And, while we’ve been focusing on command officers willing to invoke these whims in exchange for career opportunities, we haven’t paid too much attention to who initiated that pressure. Those politicians won’t be able to keep their mouths shut. I’m looking forward to seeing that laid bare.

   1. astute.
      what you describe will happen. lm counting on some entertaining back-and-forth.
      also, next up: WOMEN’S aka XX chromosome and ONLY XX chromosome sports.

   2. Orson
      Excellent point.
      Yes the IDIOTS will spout off, big time. Also the financial supporters will be identified. China being big on this one.

      1. I’m sure Orson is very pleased with your endorsement. /sarc

2. If they are deployable, deploy them to be peacekeepers in whatever Hotspot needs 15k “troops”

3. The military doesn’t accept people with false teeth, why would they accept people with false penis’ or false vag?
   Are they not too precious to be put into fighting form?

   The next year or so of US and Canadian politics are going to be lit. We may look back on this as “the golden age” of getting what we want.

   1. One of the reasons why diabetics are not acceptable in the military is because they are dependent on drugs (insulin) to maintain a healthy balance. Trannies require drugs as well to maintain the falsehood of being a man or being a woman. They cannot be deployed on to a field of combat because they might not have access to their drugs. So there is that argument when their military service is under review.

      1. Agreed. Plenty of precedent to refuse transexuals in the military.
         …and if the trannies think I’m being transphobic, well… do I really care at this point?
         I’ve been called a lot of things, like “pedophile supporter” (are you listening, GYM?), so this labelling just rolls off my back. Their insults (along with GYM’s slander) have lost all meaning, because that card has been so badly overplayed (again… are you listening, GYM?)

4. They throw out active duty members who had one episode of kidney stones because said issue can’t be dealt with in theater. How do they expect the medics to treat people hopped up on cross hormones or have had elective surgeries?

5. Aside from the physical medical issues, who wants someone who is demonstrably mentally ill serving in the military? They should have stuck with “don’t ask…don’t tell” for gays (who are perfectly capable of serving in any capacity), and kept the ‘transsexuals’ out.

   It’s not good when your enemies laugh at your armed f0rces. It’s particularly not good when your top generals are making public statements about DEI being their “top priority”.

   (so…NOT training for (and fighting) actual wars, then? Good to know…)

6. FTA:
   “Paulo Batista, a transgender analyst in the Navy, said that a ban would have a ripple effect through the armed services.
   “You take 15,000 of us out — there’s more but that’s the number that is always mentioned — that’s 15,000 leadership positions, every one of us play a vital role,”…”

   Apparently, all the trans folk are in “leadership positions.” LMFAO!
   I don’t think those…positions…are leadership ones.

   Also, my bet is that recruitment will see a boost from getting rid of those weirdos.

   1. ““You take 15,000 of us out — ”

      With only 0.1 to 0.6% of people identifying as ‘transsexuals’ overall, I call BS on his ‘15,000’ in the US military. There are only 48,000 gays (about 2.2%, roughly the same percentage as the population at large) currently serving.

7. L – Or they could be given blue helmets and sent to the Middle-East as UN Peacekeepers?

   1. When I first read your comment, I thought you were making a blue-haired joke. Perhaps not, but it works equally well as is!

8. I recall being told that transgender troops in our military were all the vital Farsi translators who were essential in our analyst positions. I never believed that then, and I don’t believe we cannot get on without these mental patient freaks now. Send them all to the showers … the proper xx xy showers.

   1. Not the Z showers?

9. Load them on a C-5, and kick them out at 20,000 feet, sans parachute!

   1. Well, I wouldn’t go that far, GYM.
      I’d settle just for kicking them out of the military.
      …and out of women’s and girls’ locker rooms, and bathrooms.
      …and out of women’s and girls’ sports.
      …and…
      …but then, I’m not a hateful bigot like some people are around here…

      ^^^^^
      |||||

10. Let’s take a demographics with mental issues and a 40% suicide rate, and give them access to rifles, explosives, tanks, fighters, ships and ICBMs. A lot of the trans service members joined for the free treatments and drugs. As for the 15,000 in leadership positions that play a vital role, silly tranny, everybody is replaceable in the service.