Grab a beverage.
The Forgotten Side of Medicine- How Much Damage Have Vaccines Done to Society?
In many cases, the severe “mysterious” injuries we see now are remarkably similar to those that were observed over a century ago. Unfortunately, a widespread embargo exists on ever allowing this data to come to light (as that would instantly destroy the vaccine program).
A variety of independent studies (summarized below) have shown that vaccines cause a wide range of chronic illnesses.
If you haven’t watched the video documentary “Vaxxed” and its sequel, “Vaxxed II”, you might want to take the time. The link for the first is here: https://rumble.com/v1x0jwa-vaxxed-the-movie.html, and the link for the second is here: https://rumble.com/v2tlo3g-vaxxed-2-movie.html
I have watched both, for full disclosure. It was hard to watch the second one more than the first as it is the story of the bus, and all the families that were affected.
The synopsis is pretty straightforward: Autism parent and PhD Brian Hooker secretly records a CDC statistician admitting that they falsified quantitative data that (when not altered) proved that the MMR vaccine caused disproportionate adverse events in black children.
ie The CDC has known all along about the autism-vaccine connection. The symphony of crickets that accompanied the revelation shows the power that Big Pharma has to create complete media black outs on stories that cause them financial harm.
And they call *me* a thief.
You do realize that Vaxxed was written and directed by Andrew Wakefield, right?
Wakefield is the leader author of the original paper claiming an autism-vaccine link. The paper wasn’t just retracted. Wakefield was struck off the medical register for fraudulently inventing data. Numerous studies since then have tested the autism-vaccine link, and can find none.
I’ll get excited when the CDC releases the data, all the data the antivaxxers are demanding. If they released the data this would prove the antivaxxers wrong and stop them. So why won’t they release the data? What are they hiding?
Wakefield’s is an interesting story. He has been blackballed because of his anti-vax stand. Wouldn’t surprise me if the data issue was set up to discredit him. He originally became interested in the question of vax safety because he witnessed a kid going in to seizures immediately after the shot. Others present denied the link, “couldn’t be the vax”, when it was obviously the vax. I have a lot of time for Wakefield who has paid a high price but kept his integrity.
He was blackballed for making stuff up.
I’ve followed the Wakefield story all the way through. He was definitely blackballed. You can also watch the documentary he and Robert F. Kennedy Jr made on the tetanus vaccine with clandestine sterilization in Kenya:
https://infertilitymovie.org/a-diabolical-agenda/
Ah, but did those studies find any link between rats and ENORMOUS BALLS?
https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/02/scientists-aghast-at-bizarre-ai-rat-with-huge-genitals-in-peer-reviewed-article/
What you keep refusing to acknowledge is that the medical establishment’s thorough corruption over COVID and the COVID vaccines has permanently destroyed public confidence. And the Replication Crisis means that people are realizing that this didn’t start with COVID.
You’re using circular logic.
1. Medical research is corrupt, because…
2. The preponderance of studies have found that COVID vaccines are acceptably safe and effective…
3. Which is wrong, therefore…
4. See point #1.
Now you’re just muddying the waters. “Enormous Rat Balls” is this week’s special at Warren Kinsella’s favourite Chinese restaurant.
Quit believing Wikipedia. And as for those studies, peer reviewed vaccine studies are more suspect. There has never been a control study for the vaccines in the schedule for children, to see if they are safe. They test against another vaccine of their choice. It is a farce. Most, if not all of them are unnecessary, just like the seasonal flu shot for adults.
It’s hard to gauge the size of the trend, but I’ve noticed a lot of posts from Covid vaxx advocates on social media who, when confronted with the reality that mass vaccination did not stop transmission or infection, adopted the stance that the vaxx at least prevents serious illness. Now that this is even in doubt, the latest gambit seems to be to blame any and all serious illness, including “dying suddenly”, to the latest catch-all cause: “long covid”.
If only the unjabbed were “dying suddenly” as well that’d make their arguments so much more believable.
Four years in and we still see people walking or driving by themselves wearing their face diapers, We are so easily led
The shots are deadly.
Interesting tidbit in the article re rabies vaccine. I was not even aware that anyone had tried out vaccination for humans.
I had two rabies shots when I was little. Apartment building down the street had this big gap between part of the building and decorative stone columns. Kids would climb the gap. I stuck my hand in to get a grip and was immediately bit by a tiny bat.
Had to start the series of shots with the 4″ needle. County animal control caught the thing the next day, tested negative so I never got the last two shots.
Can anyone tell me who wrote this? There is no name attached, and I wanted to verify their announced degree. I don’t want to share an article without checking out more on the author. I am of the same belief, but perhaps the author is no doctor, then a share would make me look silly.
I’ve followed Midwestern Doctor on substack for a couple of years. He or she definitely has a profound understanding of cutting edge physiology and medicine—even biophysics. I’ve found his or her posts on zeta potential, for example, to be extremely helpful and in line with and adding to what I’ve seen in published studies.
One should keep in mind the dark times we live in and the persecution physicians face for challenging The Narrative. Before the 19th century great thinkers routinely wrote esoterically.
I wish we would have politicians like they have in Australian. Senate Malcolm Roberts has a few questions like why was a derivative of E-Coli used to grow the ingredient for the mRNA jabs and not egg based albumin? What are the effects of E-Coli RNA and DNA entering the human cell. Studies show that 1/3 do not produce spike protein as intended but some other protein and what are the effects on the human body? Malcolm is asking for an inquiry in regards to the Australian 13% excess death in relationship to the mRNA vaccine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsDePVSGosM
“Some other protein”?
In a word: prions.
RNrn
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche made a prediction the other week.
This is why one would identify them as “whack scenes”. 🙂
Cheers
C in C
1st St Nicolaas Army
Army Group True North
Vaccines hurt, so they can help.. The question is how much hurt is worth it.. Lets play the bad lottery in support of doctors, government and big business.. All three have separate motivations that overlap on you quality or life, or lack of it..
They don’t care.. Central planning is going to plan and scheme their little schemes.. Nobody is responsible :).. Trust in your own naivety :).. While you hate the ones who point it out..
As for war crimes.. You have to lose the war before the show trials become necessary.. We haven’t won scht..
Amen.
10TH ANNIVERSARY LIMITED EDITION DISSOLVING ILLUSIONS DISEASE, VACCINES, AND THE FORGOTTEN HISTORY
Unlike the standard edition, Dissolving Illusions: 10th Anniversary Limited Edition is printed in color, a feature designed to bring to life the intricate details embedded in over 50 charts scattered throughout the book. Moreover, including color allows you to fully appreciate other visual elements, like the photographic images, as they were when originally created. Also, throughout the pages of this limited edition, you will find snapshots of our original research and personal photographs, offering a glimpse into the behind-the-scenes journey that has shaped Dissolving Illusions.
$76.00
https://www.terrapinstationers.com/products/10th-anniversary-limited-edition-dissolving-illusions-disease-vaccines-and-the-forgotten-history
Dissolving Illusions, Tenth Anniversary edition is available at Amazon.ca for $46. Probably not the colour edition.
That’s correct. Not the color edition.
https://theylied.ca/
It’s always been a trade off between horrible deadly and or disabling diseases like small pox, diptheria or polio etc. and bad reactions to the vaccine. However, COVID being basically a bad cold, this trade off was like trading Bobby Orr for Joe Shmo.
The trade off for Polio was SIV becoming HIV and the devastation it wrought.
Yeah sure. You have any proof of that? Didn’t think so.
The link between vaccines/brain damage and crime is shocking.
I have nothing against vaccines but mRNA “vehicles” with a spike protein in the driver’s seat is not a vaccine. I also believe that until the last few years vaccine injuries were rare and, arguably, worth the risk. Sorry, not sorry, for having a conventional view of this technology.
I went to a travel vaccine physician about ten years ago to get vaccines for a business project in Africa. I asked the physician why did I need to go to a doctor for this? What do you do?
Basically, he looks up the death rate for diseases in the country and compares it to the death rate for the vaccine for my age and makes a cost benefit decision.
I asked him if he got annual flu vaccines. >>pause<< No.
That’s about where I am sitting. I am leaning more and more to the full antivaxxer position. I know we were lied to grossly about the mRNA gene therapy by the authorities that are supposed to be protecting us and so I find myself now questioning everything they ever told me. Maybe they didn’t start lying with the mRNA gene therapy. Maybe they’ve been lying all along. It’s an unhappy place to be.
jenny from another angle
https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/190/711/190711594080119803f/29753665940801489d03.jpg
(no wonder she has a kid)
I see SDA has graduated from COVID-vaccine skeptic to full-on vaccine skeptic. That’s a dangerous game.
It’s pretty easy to convince people vaccines are dangerous — actually, it’s pretty easy to convince people of almost anything — if you only present one side of the argument without rebuttal. Well let me give some rebuttal, focusing on Paul Thomas. The graphs from Thomas are taken from this paper:
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674
As you can see from the big yellow bar at the beginning, the paper was retracted. The reason for the retraction was not spurious as claimed, but rather:
“an investigation was conducted that raised several methodological issues and confirmed that the conclusions were not supported by strong scientific data.”
One of the problems was that measuring how often a child visits a doctor is not a sound measure of the health of the child. There are too many confounding factors. As an example, poorer people tend to get vaccinated less and also have less access to health care, resulting in fewer visits. As well, parents who have little trust in doctors are less likely to get their children vaccinated or visit the doctor.
And here’s a critique of the The Control Group, which finds that the group seems to be far more about filling the pockets of litigation lawyers than presenting sound science:
https://www.respectfulinsolence.com/2021/02/26/control-group-a-litigation-driven-antivaccine-survey-of-the-unvaccinated/
Dude, you read the links you post? Forget the Bill Maher-style diatribe of invective, the appeals to authority and the name-calling. Can someone show me an actual analysis embedded in any of these screeds? Can YOU demo strate that Pfizer followed sound practice when making their claims? The vaccine approval process in Western countries is already severely compromised by Big Money, and sorry, when in doubt, follow the money.
So the usual approval process was suspended, in favour of a rushed approval and rollout, and we are surprised by the results?
How much are they paying YOU to peddle this drivel. Give us hard data, source code, analytic methodolgy, study design and appropriate theorems, assumptions, and margins of error, or stfu.
I take it, then, you think The Control Group is all tickety boo.
It’s not. It’s a pseudo-scientific site run by a lawyer using data collection methods that no scientist would ever consider dependable.
If you want to discuss The Control Group, we can do that. If you want to change the topic and insult me to boot, don’t respond at all.
Generation Rescue is the most appalling of the lot. The original study that purported to show that vaccines cause autism wasn’t just wrong, it was fraudulent. The great tragedy is that researchers had to spend time and money testing the theory, as many in the public bought into it. The resources could have been better spent elsewhere:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24814559/
it is also very easy to find a rebuttal argument and point to authority or peer review. The problem with your argument is that the peer review process has been completely corrupted by money, cronyism, subsidies and government intervention. I no more believe your sources as a trusted review of the sources you think are corrupted than you believe any other source put up here. If covid proved anything-ith is that the government, the medical industry, the pharmaceutical companies, the Scientists and the media just do not have any credibility anymore and can’t be trusted. That is a sad fact. Anyone who thinks a flu shot is vaccine, in my humble non medical opinion-is a complete and utter moron. It didn’t stop or reduce you getting it, spreading it, getting hospitalized by it or dying from it and claims to the contrary cannot be backed up data-only claims or by pointing to some dodgy “peer review” in a “respected” medical journal. The only data we had access to in Australia was media reports or the word of the government official-except for NSW who (stupidly/incompetently) announced each two weeks the vaccination status of those in hospital, in ICU or died from/with? They eventually stopped doing that as the numbers rapidly deteriorated (very rapidly) to show the hospitals were full of the “vaccinated”. They stopped the data in September 2022 when it was no longer tenable to show that no-one unvaccinated was dying and 53% of the covid deaths were triple jabbed,. I am honest enough to say that probably most of those 53% were old and didn’t actually die of covid but with-but those were the rules the government and the true believers wanted to play by. I would also say that before the jabs started everyone dying of covid was also old decrepit so again, the jabs didn’t change anything.
Now, we both know you are going to claim that’s because more people were “vaccinated” so of course more people in hospital were jabbed-and you will do so without one bit of self awareness how stupid that argument is if it were truly a vaccine.
Finally, the excess deaths-after a true pandemic the death rate should fall , the theory being the old , frail and weak have died earlier than expected leaving behind what should be a healthier society. That is what happened after all the other pandemics-but not this one-something else happened that changed the way things usually happened.
Ya, I’m not going to respond to that fire hose of dubious assertions. It takes ten times the resources to refut a piece of nonsense than to state it, and I haven’t got the time.
If you want to pick out ONE point from that rant you want to debate, I can do that.
What do you think about the literature on heightened IgG4 levels among the mRNA gene therapy vaxxed? What do you think the impact of that is going to be if it is true?
I don’t know much about it except that there’s a lot of mays and mights and potentials in the literature, so a lot more research is needed.
The best guide to the safety of mRNA vaccines is large-scale controlled randomized double-blind studies, preferably carried out by researchers who are independent of the pharmaceutical companies; in short, we examine the actual outcomes.
You don’t need to present the other side. We get that 24/7 from media, government and the entire medical establishment. I personally am all for giving anyone a vaccine who wants one, providing people are first given full disclosure so they can make can assess risk vs benefit and make an informed decision. I also think coercion to take a vaccine is a crime against humanity that people should literally hang for.
I am curious how you feel about coercion versus informed consent. Do you approve of what Turdo did to Canadians with his mandates?
Are you still in the mRNA gene therapy is “safe and effective” camp?
No, Jenny McCarthy is just as crazy as we thought she was. The case against vaccines is still weak, and digging up every medical crank and reporting their views as if it’s God’s truth doesn’t change that.
KM, a few years back, after watching a documentary on the MMR vaccine, I checked up on the incidence of autism in the UK.
Back in the 1960’s it was 5 per 10,000.
Now it is 160 per 10,000.
The medical establishment are 100% certain it isn’t the vaccine ( just like ” At the time of the drug’s development, scientists did not believe any drug taken by a pregnant woman could pass across the placental barrier and harm the developing fetus”), but there sure as hell is ‘something’ causing it.
And unlike most other posters here, who pop up on threads about lots of different subjects, you seem to spend the vast majority of your time defending big pharma.
Just sayin’
He’s on the payroll. His “debunking” threads are like watching Bill Maher trying to critique GR.
He’s on the payroll.
I guess it’s easier to make horsecrap like that up then it is to actually rebut an argument, so have at ‘er.
So… because the rate of autism and the rate of vaccination increased at about the same time period, vaccination causes autism. Is that the argument? Even you must admit that’s weak.
One of the main reasons why the reported rate of autism has increased is because both its medical definition and awareness of the condition has expanded over the last 75 years, resulting in more diagnoses. As an example, Asperger Syndrome is now considered to be a type of autism. Another reason may be because in 1991 the U.S. federal government ruled that an autistic child qualified for special education services, driving more families to seek a diagnosis.
But is there something else going on? No one seems entirely sure. The rise in the number of premature babies has been suggested. Vaccines have also been suggested, but there’s no credible evidence for it, as the paper I gave a link to above shows.
Actually I spend almost no time defending big pharma. I rarely even mention them. I do defend the COVID vaccines, as the vast preponderance of scientific evidence shows they are reasonably safe and effective, and certainly better than no vaccines. Further, the arguments against the vaccines are almost uniformly shoddy. They rarely stand up to even cursory examination.
“So… because the rate of autism and the rate of vaccination increased at about the same time period, vaccination causes autism. Is that the argument? Even you must admit that’s weak”
Straw man. I am fully aware that correalation isn’t causation but something is causing the increase in early / excess deaths in countries with a high jab rate and people are 100% certain of what isn’t causing it, yet unable to tell us what is. Perhaps it’s because deaths are being reported more often…….
I vist SDA every day, and whilst not looking at every thread, my experience is that if there is a thread on ‘vaccines’ you’ll be commenting on it. A lot.
If you’re not suggesting there’s a link between vaccines and autism, why did you say “something’s causing it”? There must be a point to that comment.
So far as excess mortality rates, there’s many possibilities, including COVID itself. The more virulent strains of COVID often attacked the major organs such as the brain, heart, lungs, pancreas, liver, and kidneys, and it’s not unreasonable to suppose that this caused lasting damage that is now manifesting itself in excess deaths.
There’s even a possibility that it’s caused by poor methods for calculating expected deaths. It’s not an easy thing to estimate, as populations are constantly changing in age and so on, and the pandemic didn’t help in that regard.
Or it could be caused by the COVID vaccines, but with no evidence to show that it is, there’s no particular reason to jump on the bandwagon. “I don’t know” seems like a much more reasonable position.
Last time I reviewed the literature I found well over 200 reports indicating adverse effects with the mRNA vax as well as several papers linking a biologically plausble mechanism for everything from the calamari clots to prion disease. So how do you feel about the latest Cureus paper out of Japan linking the mRNA jab to increased cancer in Japan?
I never denied that there can be adverse effects, as there are with all vaccines. But serious adverse effects are rare.
Did you read the Cureus paper out of Japan? It’s extraordinarily weak, and I wonder how it even got published. All they really said is that the mortality rates of some (but not all) cancers rose during the pandemic. They tried to tie that to COVID vaccines, but they presented no evidence of that. In particular, there was no control group where they compared cancer rates of the vaccinated to the unvaccinated.
John Campbell did a bit on it, and it was almost funny. You could tell that even he wasn’t terribly convinced.
I read the cureus paper and it is very easily refuted if the data on cancer in vaxxed versus unvaxxed were released. But can’t have that can we?
Our “betters” are playing with the data. Take Manitoba where any and all potential adverse reactions to the mRNA gene therapy was automatically classified as COVID in an unvaxxed for day 1-14 after the jab. And then there is the anything happening after 28 days since the last jab is automatically classified as unrelated. But within those very narrow confines our Health Department is vigilantly on alert for safety signals.
I watched John Campbell and I did not get he impression he was laughing up his sleeve about the paper. That’s your personal bias showing.
It might not have occurred to medical administrators to systematically collect the vaccination status of terminal cancer patients.
KM’s dismissive condescension is based entirely on an unwarranted faith in the integrity of the underlying data. We know full well – we have testimony under oath – that the underlying data regarding COVID spread and lethality were intentionally manipulated. It would be foolish to accept any data about COVID or COVID vaccines at this point; it’s all either hopelessly corrupted or cannot be independently verified.
National Citizen’s Inquiry reports that 57000 Canadians were killed by the Covid injections. How do you respond to that. Have you read their final report? https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/
Almost no one’s read the entire report. It’s over 600 pages long. On what page does it say that 57,000 Canadians were killed? That’s the type of result that might be estimated in a major scientific study, but is far beyond the capabilities of a commission as it requires extensive medical and statistical expertise.
Is this what you’re referring to?
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/mrna-vaccines-100-percent-covid-deaths-canada/
Because it says that there were over 50,000 deaths due to COVID, but only 4 deaths that could reasonably credited to the vaccines.
Again with all adverse reactions days 1-14 (1-21 in BC and Saskatchewan) being automatically attributed to COVID in an unvaxxed and all adverse reactions after 28 days being classified as unrelated it’s hard to find a safety signal. All they have to do to refute the allegations the mRNA gene is unsafe and ineffective is release the raw data on the health of the jabbed vs unjabbed in an anonymized form (without their very convenient interpretation) as to what is unjabbed to protect privacy. Let the independent researchers have a go at it.
We’ll Danielle Smith thinks an infant should be on COVID mRNA starting at 6 months and to have had 7 of these shots by the time they are 2 years old. In fact, Ms. Smith thinks you should have 320 of these shots over your lifetime.
https://www.westernstandard.news/news/alberta-updates-mrna-booster-guidance-to-every-three-months-starting-with-six-month-old-babies/53832
I wonder why they are targeting the indigenous population. Today’s version of small pox blankets?
“Correlation is not causation”, they do go together.
Correlation is not causation but when you see correlation you’re supposed to do a deep dive to make sure it is just a correlation. Meantime you’re supposed to do risk benefit analysis and give informed consent. That was in the olden days when people still believed in things like ethics which seem to have gone out of fashion today. I am stupid old man for thinking ethics matter I guess.
If I am an athlete in my early twenties with virtually no chance of dying of COVID why should I take a mRNA gene therapy jab that lands me with a 1/800 change of myocarditis or pericarditis even if it is mild and quickly resolved? (That whole assurance of mild and quickly resolved is also highly questionable based on several case reports and peer reviewed publications on the issue.) Why would anyone in their right mind take such a risk with their heart? Never mind the 200+ other adverse reactions that correlate with the mRNA gene therapy jab? And why should anyone listen to those officials pushing the mRNA gene therapy jab as they are clearly lying when they say safe and effective for everyone six months and up?
I dunno? Are milkmaids still getting smallpox?
Hello! I just wanted to thank you for sharing my article!
The problem with the vaccine-crime link thesis is that violent crimes dropped steadily throughout the 1990s and 2000s, even as the number of recommended vaccines increased.