One child is great, two is great, three is selfish? Apparently, those damn kids and everyone else has killed off a staggering seventy percent of nature. If you find that hard to believe, you only need to gaze at McCarthy’s squiggly pie chart for proof!
If I was debating this apocalyptic greenie for whom every societal issue boils down to a calculation of carbon dioxide output, the first question I would ask is if he ever heard of the famous bet between Paul Erlich and Julian Simon.
I would ask why he hasn’t set the example for the virtues of depopulation.
It’s not too late if you have had more than two kids. Canada has a Minister of MAID and Climate Change whose post-partum pro-choice pogrom completely eliminates the carbon footprint of 10,000 Canadians per year and all but guarantees they won’t have any more progeny. “Progressive” on steroids.
So wouldn’t a third kid be better for the environment than importing a family of 47 muslims from Shitholeistan??? Or even one Gazan for that matter.
In reality, yes, in the libtards world view, no. The third world muzzie kids are better than ours we’ve been told.
The guy’s argument in that video about the one extra kid flying to Canada on holiday. Hey, retarded 64 yo gay Briton, that plane is flying anyway. The carbon footprint of the f@&king plane isn’t changing if one less kid from the same family gets on. Dummy.
Gosh no! Haven’t you heard how environmentally sensitive migrants are compared to us?
Exactly. I’ve been to Mexico. So tidy!
I think this great, if all worried about their carbon footprint would be sterilized, can you imagine the positive impact on the gene pool by weeding, or not breeding all that garbage out of the gene pool?
More chlorine is needed in the gene pool. To remove the scum who think there’s no room for anyone else.
He makes a very convincing argument. He didn’t even finish his first sentence before I was persuaded his parents had one too many descendants.
I used to lament the EXTREMIST Animal Rights activists insisting that; a dog = a roach = a pig = a little girl
But now; a little girl = a carbon footprint
Can we become MORE dehumanizing? Good Lord. Abortion because a baby girl would interfere with college? A baby girl would keep mom from getting a Gender Studies diploma? What have we become as we shift our Faith from the Creator of the Universe to belief in Gaia’s Natural Environment. We are reverting to “Primitive Man” … barking at the moon and tossing little virgins into volcanos. These people are sick. Mental patient sick.
BTW … I had 3 kids. But since my only brother died childless at age 27 … I had HIS FAIR SHARE of children. So … mathematically, my family only had 1.5 children. GFY you inhuman monsters.
I suggest people with that attitude don’t venture into the town we live near. The local religious group takes the “go forth and multiply” suggestion very seriously. Their average family size ranges from 8-12 kids. Other families average 3-4 kids. Children are everywhere. The lady that did our house appraisal a few years back mentioned that it is one of only a few towns in her region that’s growing.
A lot of brown people in your neighborhood then? Because aborting carbon footprints is a 1st world white girl problem.
Oh! Or The Mormons.
A Scandinavian Lutheran group. They’re pretty pale.
Their Trans Bishop must be so proud.
Those pale Scandinavian Lutheran folx can pump the babies out. Like the Catholic families of yesteryear.
So once you buy off the media, like the Turd has done,,, then you never have to answer the question of,
“What is the carbon impact for Canada, of allowing 1,000,000 migrants into the country?”
What’s more ‘selfish’ than having no children ?
Raising them so they are everyone else’s problem ?
Yeah, pop replacement. Do these folks even have a *ahem* a COUPLE brain cells???
I would ask how life developed with CO2 levels an order of magnitude higher than today.
“I would ask how life developed with CO2 levels an order of magnitude higher than today.”
MANY orders of magnitude… In the Neoproterozoic era, some 750 million years ago, sea-level glaciers a mile high came and went – twice – at the Equator. There are no sea-level glaciers anywhere near the Equator today. At that time, CO2 was 30% of the atmosphere: today it is 0.04%.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/18/monckton-answers-a-troll/
– For reference, CO2 is currently ~4/10,000ths of the atmosphere – and humans contribute only 4% of that.
Question. If human beings are not natural/nature are we supernatural and god like?
Sitting down yesterday with an old co -worker from a past job I learned that people where beside themselves after he removed a willow tree with an excavator, and was busting it down to size to load into trucks. They said it was done inhumanely. Yes inhumanely, and the head city official for public works stated the same and he was serious.
Now if anyone thinks voting will change such bloody insanity coming from well off brain dead bleeding hearts good luck. Because that tree being removed was making way for shore protection along the very lake front their frigging homes are built on.
Environmentalists of course have every right to state their point, however the people they want to torture with their sensitivities also have the right to get in their face and tell them they are insane and they can kindly go f themselves, same with the city officials that are nothing but parasites.
I have to say people placing inhumane in reference to a tree was a surprise but after thinking about it and the state of this country it makes sense.
Prog Environmentalists are insane period.
Come on man, people talk to their plants, hug trees, apparently are even sexually attracted to trees. Insane is the correct word.
Sexually attracted to trees? Willow, weep for me, ruff ruff!