LOOK: Access to Information Request Reveals Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Contract with Canada.
Within the contract dated October 26, 2020, on page 18, it states that the “Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known. Furthermore, to the extent applicable, the Purchaser acknowledges that the Product shall not be serialized.”
You can review the contract at the link below. Give the link 10-15 seconds to load.
Link here
Related: The United States Army is reportedly encouraging the service members they kicked out for refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine, to return.
But Sophie Gregoire Trudeau’s new boyfriend told us it was safe and effective.
Was that just before her first jab?
Jab in, jab out, jab in, jab out…
What does shall not be serialized mean in this context?
Meaning that you have no clue where it’s made or privilege to know what it contains as every batch can be different ingredients.
Pretty much. The really interesting words are “shall not be serialized.” In other words, we’re just not going to do it. Should have activated klaxons and sirens.
https://www.visiott.com/blog/pharma-serialization-comprehensive-description/
The true context is tracking a specific dose. They didn’t want someone to be able to pull records and identify the origin, date of creation, and shipping process for select doses. There are many reasons for this (most of them not above board). Suppose their clinical trials reveal a problem with the “vaccination.” They could make changes since they were not originally obligated to even tell us what was in the serum. And, you’d have no way to associate adverse reactions to the “vaccination” with that original formula before the change. There’d be no purposeful way to track that.
To me, that’s pretty crazy, especially when food products require serialization. And the shelf life of a “vaccine” is about 1 year to a year and a half.
I’d add this as well. At the very beginning of the “great vaccine hunt” multiple pharmaceutical companies were racing to beat the others so they could solicit those nice juicy contractual agreements with various nations all over the world. Speed in development was essential. Corners were likely cut and eventually corrected to some extent (I’d like to think so, anyway). If that original “vaccine” had a shelf life of over a year, then manipulated versions of that original “vaccine” probably came out in that time frame. And without serialization, you’d have no way to distinguish which of those two “vaccines” you received.
As I understand now, the major “corner cutting” was the switch from a time consuming Polymerase Chain Reaction production of modified mRNA to an ease and fast “brew” process involving E. coli bacteria. The denial to serialization (and that’s just my hypothesis) would allow for “spiking” sub-lots. The end-game here is that an adverse effect may be linked to a lot, but one cannot follow the number of adverse effects linked to a vial. There is at least one report (don’t ask me for receipts; I just can’t keep up) linking something like 30 deaths (over time) to 30 people who got the death shot from the same shutter on the same day. I think was an Ausy place. Lord have mercy.
I believe the 30 deaths from 30 shots within a fairly short time after injection was in New Zealand, from one medical practice. Information came from a whistleblower.
Why is section 5.2 blocked out?
Fake and Defective.
There, fixed.
“Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known…”
The vaccination command caused permanent erosion of good faith in the wisdom of our governors, and of one’s confidence in the reliability of Canada’s increasingly expensive/intrusive health care system.
Informed consent though….right? At least that what i kept hearing…right?
Whats it called when there was no informed consent??? I cant seem to recall…
Nevermind, look at Ukraine and Gaza!!
Something I find outrageous is that at one point people expressed concerns because mandating an experimental vaccine was a violation of the Nuremberg code. The media assured us this was not the case, as the
vaccines had been ” approved” by Heath Canada. At this point, I think law suits are in order. Maybe Celine Dion can get the ball rolling. She has a good case.
There’s a lot going on behind the scenes. Many countries are experiencing a high percentage of unexplained excess deaths in all age groups. Canada appears to below average at 15%. Many are attributing this to the Covid vaccines.
Dr. John Campbell is covering this well.
https://youtu.be/1uOxhYyfYw4
Will we ever see justice done to the government and the bureaucrats that are still promoting the deadly vaxxes?
I doubt it as the terminally stupid are still lining up for shots.
Just so you know, most of the pages have been redacted. Typical !!!!
Pfizer knew, the Turdeau Liberal govt. knew, Health Canada knew, as well as all the “expert” Provincial Health Officials, Et cetera, Et cetera, Et cetera. They all knew, but they still coerced, cajoled and forced as many people as possible to take the shot.
The contract was signed on behalf of this corrupt, lying government by Anita Anand.
However, many million are shots left over should be administered to every single individual that colluded to poison, maim, and kill Canadians, as a start.
So why did the media tell the public day after day “Safe and effective” when big pharma didn’t state that? Who paid the media to lie, and can we sue them?