43 Replies to “Safe And Effective®”

  1. I suspect that we will see the data change or disappear to cover up the excess deaths. Much like “experts” do with inconvenient climate change records: lower past temperatures and cherry pick starting dates for data to claim “unprecedented and record breaking” temperature rises. There’s numerous ways to torture data until it tells you what you want.

    I think the USA military was already accused of adjusting past data in an attempt to cover up rises in disability and disorders after covid vaccinations of soldiers. Or think of how public health included the recently vaccinated (days 0- 21) as unvaccinated even though its incredibly simple to have a database have a column for the recently vaccinated.

    Given the track record, I expect many forms of data manipulation. If all else fails data will simply be lost or destroyed by unfortunate incidents.

    1. I worked in a control tower in around 1997. We had an IPPC member visit the tower. He stayed over 3 weeks going over the temperatures as far back 1886. The WX forcaster that was showing him around told us later that he copied all the temperatures, except he lowered all the temperatures by 2 degrees. He also set up a temperature gauge on the roof of the forcasters building. The normal distance is 100 feet from the nearest building. One of my coworkers said you will have will have the temperature reading high. His answer was thats the idea of it. So this BS started a long time ago.

  2. There never was a killer virus. The Coronahoax was just that – 100% manufactured BS.

    And yet by the controlled propaganda sources that all parrot the same lies, aka the mainstream media, most people are deceived. Either fully (aka everyone on the left) or partially (those on the right, who believe some of the lies).

    The deaths pre-vaccines were made up, or falsely attributed to the Coronahoax to scare people into getting injected with poison.

    After getting poisoned, the controlled media are coming up with the most idiotic lies to explain the results of people being poisoned.

    For those still going down the “wet market in China”, or “virus escaped from a lab” stupidity, you’ll fall for the next virus hoax. It is surely going to get rolled out, and it will come with its own moronic back-story and counter narratives. But regardless, more fascism and poison shot pressures will occur, and likely worse than before.

    For you, I don’t know what to tell you. But I’ll try.

    Wake up!

  3. Besides excess deaths from cardiac arrests there is a huge rise in neurological problems that isn’t being talked about much. Proof? Not exactly but it has suddenly become very difficult to get to see a neurologist, in the US, lately because they are booked up for months in advance. Now what could be behind the sudden need for all these folks seeking help for neurological symptoms?

    2. Guillan Barre Syndrome, a known negative of the vacc shots, is a sickness of the nervous system., hence more people going to neurologists.

      1. Not just GBS but it seems to have triggered autoimmune reactions in some people.

  4. Why didn’t they inject pure spike protein instead of the mRNA? Anyone care to explain why all the effort to make your own cells create this toxin?

  6. I’ll bet 80% of NA women are on Prosaic Valium or some kind of drug to help them get by…

    Kids can’t cope and are chosing to end it all in epidemic numbers.

    All this was happening before March 2020. If the numbers are up from there, where do we go from here?

  7. How many of the vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated regretted their decision?

  8. I know the anti-vaxxers would like to blame current excess mortality on the COVID vaccine, but there’s an alternate explanation; the COVID disease itself.

    It’s well known that COVID can do lasting damage to one’s brain, heart, lungs, and liver. Such damage can occur even when the COVID symptoms are relatively mild. This would inevitably increase mortality in the years following the infection.

    https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/covid-long-haulers-long-term-effects-of-covid19

        1. The reason I ask is that paper was duly published in the literature, and is now blowing apart as e-mails are revealed that the authors knew better, but concluded with the NARRATIVE Dr.’s Fauci and Collins wanted, for money. Nothing more, nothing less. That simply feeds the skepticism people have to the “literature”.

          1. I don’t know what paper you’re referring to. Can you give a proper reference?

      1. The current excess mortality could be a combination of things, definitely.

  9. The current excess mortality IS ABSOLUTELY & UNDENIABLY a combination of things.

    I am sure we could argue forever on some topics, but not this one.

    The MRNA shot is 100% in the mix.

  10. Done done and done.. The only lasting regret I have is one of my daughters went out and got the two shots.. She is 27 years old and calls her own shots.. Literally.. Her reasoning?.. She wanted to be able to go clubbing..

    Breaks my heart when I think of that for a number of reasons..

  11. What I really want to see is blood banks for unvaccinated people and agricultural supply chains free of mRNA contamination. Give me that and you can blame the excess deaths on climate change to your heart’s content.

  12. I can’t help but wonder why you are so passionate about defending those experimental vaccines when there are red flags everywhere. When legitimate questions are raised about vaccine safety, most people would want to have the issue investigated. You, on the other hand, simply want to insist they are safe. I think there needs to be a formal investigation that looks at why some people were seriously injured and others died.

    1. Because the red flags are almost all of shoddy quality. They rarely stand up to serious scrutiny. Meanwhile countless large-scale scientific studies say the opposite.

      This very article is a case in point. Many anti-vaxxers reflexively conclude that excess mortalities are caused by the vaccine. What they SHOULD be saying is we don’t know. Vaccines are only one possibility out of many. It needs investigating.

      1. That was my point — it needs investigating, but that is not happening. And – you do not answer my question. Why exactly do you take such a fervent interest in defending the experimental vaxes?

        1. Why exactly do you take such a fervent interest in defending the experimental vaxes?

          The vaccines can no longer be considered experimental. They are now likely the most studied vaccines to have ever been produced. The number of papers on them globally is in the tens of thousands.

          But I have answered the question: because a strong preponderance of the scientific evidence shows they are fit for purpose. The vaccines are not perfect, but definitely helpful.

          And I have a question for you. Why are you so fervently attacking the vaccines, given the science?

          1. The number of papers on them globally is in the tens of thousands

            And yet, it moves.

            Seriously, man, have you ever read Thomas Kuhn? Number of papers produced means nothing. Look at the number of papers churned out every year based on the complete fiction that anthropogenic CO2 drives climate. We have ample evidence that many critical papers on the Kung Flu were based on garbage data, because the source data was manipulated to hide what was really going on. Garbage In, Garbage Out.

          2. You are basically saying scientific evidence counts for nothing and should be ignored.

            Fine. Hold that view. I doubt there’s any way I’m going to convince you otherwise.

          3. Jesus tap-dancin’ Christ, you go on about the “reproducibility crisis” in science, but when faced with a situation where there are many independent studies essentially finding the same result, you dismiss it as irrelevant.

            Well is having multiple studies being able to confirm each others findings important, or isn’t it?

          4. There are too many unexplained deaths and serious debilitating injuries– many in populations you would not expect to be seriously affected. So my position is that we need to investigate (autopsies) why this is happening. Excess deaths have not been explained, and until that happens, the vaccines remain experimental. There is no understanding of long-term term impact. Science is known to be in error on occasion, and is often badly done.
            Again, I ask, what is your personal interest in this? Most vax supporters do not spend a lot of time studying scientific research and trying to persuade others of vaccine safety. This is clearly a moral cause for you.

          5. Investigating is fine — more than fine, in fact. But jumping to conclusions about the reasons for it is not.

            At any rate, the number of excess deaths seems to be diminishing in Canada, although for some reason the government has about a six-month delay in reporting statistics.

            Again, I ask, what is your personal interest in this? Most vax supporters do not spend a lot of time studying scientific research and trying to persuade others of vaccine safety. This is clearly a moral cause for you.

            My personal interest is that I’m fascinated by this phenomenon of a large — or at least enthusiastic — community of anti-vaxxers denying a massive body of scientific evidence in favor of “evidence” of the most dodgy sort. The mindset of these people escapes me. Part of it may be an instinct towards contrariness, but that’s a poor guide for finding the truth.

      2. @Killer
        I think that for many people, their starting point is anchored in personal experience. I do not know anyone who died of Covid, or even became seriously ill. Most of these deaths in Canada occurred in public institutions, care homes, etc. Since the vax, however, I know about 10 people who appear to have had serious and mysterious health issues, since being vaxed — Bell’s Palsy, returning cancers, brain bleeds, vertigo, heart, unexplained passing out, etc. And several deaths — all potential side effects. It is nearly impossible to be totally neutral. Then, there is a vast body of convincing stories that others have put forward that validate my experience as well as many experts ( e.g.. Mahotra (sp?) McCullough, etc. ) Scientific studies are usually a very small snapshot. We need the government to investigate excess deaths before we can conclude anything. Prudence would also have them pausing boosters until we know why people are dying in greater than normal numbers.

        1. Personal experience is inadequate. Individuals do not have access to enough information to reduce the statistical uncertainty of their conclusions. Further, their recollection will almost certainly be skewed by their expectations.

          The rejection of anecdotal evidence in favour of large-scale systematic studies designed to neutralize personal bias, and whose conclusions were based on sound statistical analysis, was a massive step forward in medical research, and is a critical reason why modern medicine is such a inestimable boon to us today.

          Many people, of course, will not appreciate this. Our instinct to “play doctor” based on our personal experiences is a powerful one.

        2. Since the vax, however, I know about 10 people who appear to have had serious and mysterious health issues, since being vaxed — Bell’s Palsy, returning cancers, brain bleeds, vertigo, heart, unexplained passing out, etc. And several deaths — all potential side effects.

          Other medical problems did not halt just because there was a pandemic. These things happen at all times, pandemic or not. And even if you’re convinced these occurences were due to the pandemic, you must ask yourself if it was caused by COVID and not the vaccines. As an example…

          https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/2781368

          1. In my experience, these health issues are happening much more frequently, and affecting much younger people, and stats bear that out. You don’t seem to see this as concerning . We need to investigate further.

          2. It’s not a matter of lack of concern. It’s a matter of what the truth is. Individuals are easily fooled by randomness. This is why large-scale studies are not needed to draw conclusions, not anecdotal evidence.

  13. KM deliberately and consistently avoids the well documented and very serious reactions, including deaths, to mRNA ‘vaccinations’ occurring within hours to a couple of days following injection.
    By now anyone who has been paying even a bit of attention to events has seen that information, so no, I’m not going down the posting links rabbit-hole.

    2. “KM deliberately and consistently avoids the well documented and very serious reactions, including deaths, to mRNA ‘vaccinations’ occurring within hours to a couple of days following injection.”

      He also ignores the fact that all those “independent studies” finding the ‘vaccines’ to be just fine are being PAID TO SAY THAT. They toe the line, or they lose their funding.

      ClimateGate was only the tip of the iceberg. ‘Peer review’ became ‘Pal review’, and nothing they say now can be believed. I’m with LindaL: time for a formal investigation. A *real* one…one with both sides represented.

      1. He also ignores the fact that all those “independent studies” finding the ‘vaccines’ to be just fine are being PAID TO SAY THAT. They toe the line, or they lose their funding.

        You’re making it up wholesale.

        Scientific papers on the safety and efficiecy of COVID vaccines come from around the globe. There’s no evidence the researchers are being paid to find any particular result.

        If you have such evidence, present it.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation