Doubled risk: This study by Taiwanese and Stanford researchers on the US vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals shows an alarming statistical increase in the retinal vascular occlusion.
We aimed to investigate the risk of retinal vascular occlusion after COVID-19 vaccination. This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX global network and included individuals vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines between January 2020 and December 2022. We excluded individuals with a history of retinal vascular occlusion or those who used any systemic medication that could potentially affect blood coagulation prior to vaccination. To compare the risk of retinal vascular occlusion, we employed multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models after performing a 1:1 propensity score matching between the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts. Individuals with COVID-19 vaccination had a higher risk of all forms of retinal vascular occlusion in 2 years after vaccination, with an overall hazard ratio of 2.19 (95% confidence interval 2.00–2.39). The cumulative incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was significantly higher in the vaccinated cohort compared to the unvaccinated cohort, 2 years and 12 weeks after vaccination
Anti-vaxer conspiracy theory. /s off
Not the science the elites want us to follow.
As the song said, “She blinded me with science!”.
Bucky
Since Jan of this yr, am constantly reminded that I was right, it was a bio weapon and am proudly to be in the control grp of pure bloods.
O NEG: $5000. A bag
Sperm: 5000 a load.
Funny that we’ve heard NADA from the Red Cross vis a vis blood donations..were I to undergo surgery of any kind..?? I WILL Provide my own, thank you very kindly.
AB+ $20k (it’s rarer) sperm runs from not available to nearly free, depending on the recipient and delivery method.
I am almost “taken aback” (sorry) by the rise in quality blood and semen prices, but it is an open market of course, and no chance of me (or others) reporting this as income…. I recall quality semen was $3800 only a few months ago
Marc
No shit..??
I wasnt trying to undercut the market..!! Lol
May well have to look into that…!!
Where..??
I know someone who is dealing with this very thing right now.
Someone very close to me as well. When do we start putting heads on pikes?
Too bad that other responsible researchers are doing the work that Pfizer and Modena never did.
Google search of retinal vascular occlusion … Johns Hopkins Medicine
Central retinal artery occlusion is the blockage of blood to the retina of one eye. It usually causes sudden loss of eyesight in one eye. You are higher risk if you are older or have high blood pressure, glaucoma, or diabetes. You are also at higher risk if your blood is thicker and stickier than normal.
High blood pressure and aging are the main risks for CRAO. Glaucoma and diabetes can also raise your risk, as can problems in which your blood is thicker and stickier than normal. In women, the problem has been linked to the use of birth control pills.
A few comments about the excellent analysis in the YouTube video.
1) The retinal artery occlusion rate with the vax drops from 4X over 12 weeks to 2X over 2 years. (So should be much lower than 2X from 2 years onward).
2) The rate among Blacks is lower. Perhaps a significant number got fake jabs to comply with employment mandates.
3) Similarly, the lower hazard ratio for women could be a higher base rate from use of birth control pills.
It’s not just vascular arteries… while the blockage of a retinal artery is likely to produce sudden and permanent damage to the retina, there is also the possible blockage of retinal veins. Blockage of the central retinal vein can cause damage just as severe as an arterial blockage, but the damage tends to progress more slowly, and may be reversible if treated quickly . There can also be blockages in the branch veins and arteries/capillaries that can cause localized harm to the retina.
When a retinal vein is blocked, one significant risk is that your body may attempt to repair the blockage by growing new channels for blood flow, called vascularization. Unfortunately, your body tends to overdo the vascularization process, and the resulting new vascular network itself can seriously obstruct vision.
I’ve had a Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO), and was lucky enough to have it diagnosed and treated promptly. Instead of losing 80% of my vision in that eye, I lost only perhaps 5%. Having suffered that, I’m considered higher risk for a future RVO, and learning that having been vaxed will double that risk is most definitely not a comforting thought.
The vaccine wasn’t brought in for the virus, rather the virus was brought in for the vaccine. Nice to see people waking up to that fact.
If you’ve had the full compliment of shots…you have my sympathy. If you’ve only had two…stop.
Burt
Truth spoken, If Dr. David Martin is to be believed, and I do…then an mRNA vax has been available since 1990.
Adjoining that: There over 4000 Patents on Corona Viruses….One should understand that it is not possible to patent a “naturally occurring organism”
Which tells ya what..???
4000 crispr/gene spliced versions ALL created via GOF.
Cov-Sars2 only the latest version of their desired bio weapon.
NOVEL virus ..??
My (_i_)
They were mucking around with mRNA for cancer a number of years ago, it did not work.
I was skeptical of the whole covid vaccine stuff from day one. Have not received any covid vaccines at all. Seeing what is happening and the revelations regarding the danger of the vaccines, I’m happy I declined them. I’m 70 years of age, healthy weight, optimal blood pressure, active, rarely get seasonal cold, never had seasonal flu.
// A 2.19-fold increased risk of retinal vascular occlusion after COVID-19 vaccination was observed.//
Quotes from the article:
The number of reported ophthalmic complications has remained low,
and vaccine-related retinal vascular occlusion is very rare,
although the number of COVID-19 vaccinations is enormous.
As of August 2 2022, 223.04 million people had completed a primary series of COVID-19 vaccines in the US
[…]
Additional research is required to draw a solid conclusion regarding the association
between retinal vascular occlusion and COVID-19 vaccines.
Vaccination is suggested to protect against COVID-19, since the incidence of retinal vascular occlusion remains extremely low.
++
A doubled risk. But two times nothing is nothing, and this is not much higher: 7.7 per million vaccinations.
i.e. ~ 1 in 130 000
& for comparison
// If one is 60 years old, their chances of dying today are greater than 1 in 25,000. //
Each time I see some oldster buying scads of lottery tickets, I have an urge to
suggest getting out & enjoying the fresh air because: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lottery_mathematics
I have yet to see a piece of research that does not conclude with: “Additional research is required”. While your claim that this is quite a rare condition, it is just one of a myriad of conditions that have been connected to the vaccines (Tinnitus, shingles, turbo cancers, neurological issues, heart issues, strokes.) The VAERS, etc. data has side effects from these vaccines outstripping all other vaccines in history. Not very reassuring. And we still do not know what awaits people down the line. Most recently there have been concerns about damage to the immune system (IgG4) that may interfere with the ability to fight regular viruses.
Lindal, don’t forget the prion sequencing in spike. Recent autopsies are showing spike-prion vascuoles in organs all over the body. Stephanie Seneff predicted this as soon as the vaccines came out based on the protein sequencing. It’s turned up strongly with post-rollout surges in prion-related neurological conditions but the effects of the spike “propagons” are showing up in all organs in these autopsies.
I don’t think the point is the actual retinal occlusion, it’s the mechanism by which it occurs that suggests the problems we’re facing.
With excess deaths around 10-20% from pre-covid in western countries, there’s possible connections to be made. Retinal occlusion may not be something to worry about but there are tens of thousands of people dying every week that statistically shouldn’t be.
If I go blind … and can no longer read Kate’s Blog … I might just go BLIND mass murderer. Hint: you may want to all stay on the left side of my AR if it’s my left eye that gets burned out by the vaccine.
Well … at least I never boosted … not even once. So I have THAT going for me.
Roger that! I had an incident with a burst capillary on my optic nerve a couple of years ago (?!) resulting in some permanent damage to my eyesight (Left). I take this topic VERY seriously. In fact I passed the NATURE link on to my Ophthalmologist this morning.
Forgive me for making light of the topic. Our eyesight is precious.
Good thing you live in Canada … where guns are confiscated.
And eye surgery is free…..if you don’t go blind before you get an appointment.
I think more people are wising up to the scams of vaccine mania and the implications of pharma immunity from lawsuits for negligently designed, tested and manufactured vaccine products. Personally I don’t take vaccines that aren’t attenuated live virus vaccines or haven’t been on the market for at least 20 or 30 years (depending on the adjuvant cocktail). Caveat emptor. [Apparently there is an attentuated live-Covid virus vaccine out now. I’d like to see the studies on that.]
Just got a tetanus booster last month. Nothing against vaccines in principle, just none that have failed to demonstrate positive ALL-cause mortality benefit, using properly designed randomized control studies with genuine placebos.
Can anyone, hello anyone-name one good thing the fake vaccine provided to the jabbed? From where I sit the vaccine and it’s mandate maimed society at levels not seen since Germany used people as lab rats? I want justice, I want all those involved with the vaccine and it’s mandate charged with “Crimes against humanity”.
If you had inside information and got in early, like a lot of policticians might have had, then you would have made a metric crap ton of money. You just need to see who bought stock in Pfizer and Moderna before the announcement was made to know who profitted from this. The only good thing is that they will have to pay capital gains when they cash out all those millions in profits but then again that only benefits the gov’t but might provide more mony for the ongoing healthcare needs of the jabbed? Well Rose I guess you are right, the jabbed got screwed over royally by the Media, the Gov’t, our Health System and its ongoing.
Yep, I feel nothing but empathy for those forced to get the jab via threats of unemployment and the never ending name calling by the Justine regime of fascists.
Pfizer could even afford to hire loose-lipped drama Queen Pffaggggs as James OKeefe revealed. It takes a STUPID amount of FREE taxpayer money to afford those kind of mid 6-figure employees on your roster.
Shocked, I tell ya!
https://slaynews.com/news/covid-shots-had-zero-impact-reducing-deaths-study-finds/
I’m shocked. I thought the mRNA would be worse than useless, not just useless. But I suppose this is because the all-cause mortality focus doesn’t account for disabilities, etc.
Regarding live attenuated virus vaccines, from the article, “Some of Aaby’s other papers have supported the hypothesis that live attenuated vaccines like adenovirus vectors help decrease overall mortality while vaccines that contain the killed version of a germ that causes a disease increase total mortality.”
I’ve been trying, really trying over the last several years to look for a positive side to things no matter how hopeless or desperate the situation appears. I will admit it has been tantamount to suicidal trying to look on the brighter side of life over the last couple of years but as they say hope springs eternal. With that in mind the positive outlook with this potential blindness is just to consider that it is far easier to lead the blind onto the cattle cars than it is to lead the sighted. /sarc.