For several years I followed & supported so-called conservatives like Stephen Harper, Jason Kenney, Boris Johnson, and a whole host of writers from National Review. Why? Because they weren’t dyed-in-the-wool Leftists. But as the months & years marched on, while they seemingly did little to nothing to support traditional values and common sense, and the Leftists took over yet more institutions, I had an epiphany: Are these people real conservatives or merely controlled opposition of the Left?
No person more exemplifies these fake-right, lukewarm dishrag “conservatives” than David French. His brain has been deeply damaged by TDS and, more recently, DeSantis Derangement Syndrome (DDS). He is entirely fine with any insanity the Radical Left wishes to push on Americans, including young children. He will never push back against them.
Translation: David French won’t say the things I want to hear and validate my stupid prejudices and paranoias, so he’s a ‘soy boy’, whatever tf that means.
A**h***. You are so stupid it must be painful.
The proper term with French is cuckservative.
BloMe
Western governments have become, to a greater or lesser degree, welfare state bureaucracies. They motor along without need of guidance and control and, indeed, don’t want it. The poltical parties realise that they do not need to do anything to get elected, just make noises at election time and pose; elections have become media personality contests. The politicians like this as they get pensions for life when they lose and can blame the bureauracy for failure. The bureaucracy likes this as they are left to do what they wish, which is to increase self-jusitifying regulation and perview. No need for laws or votes. This bureaucratic class has also taken control of the academia, scientific research and the media as being the single largest source of funding and regulation.
Incrementalist Stephen Harper recognized this when he commented that “the civil service” will keep him in check. The EU is the resulting development for this bureaucratic government; not controlled by elected officials, elections are just for show, the books are not audited and the successful leader becomes one of the 15 (?) commissioners who have dictatorial power.
Be warned that this is the model for the World Government beloved by idealists, socialists and DAVOS billionaires.
This is why 40% of people do not vote and why PPC and new parties in Ontario and elsewhere are attracting support. Notice no new parties are left-wing and all are anti-establishment.
Very good analysis. And terrifying.
Harper was a globalist. He was all in with the TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership) which was an attempt by China to dominate the Pacific region , and was one of the first agreements from which Trump removed the US.
TPP was essentially a different version of that proposed by the WEF , aimed at global information control. If you doubt that read Chapter 17 of the TPP document.
1) The TPP is actually an attempt to prevent dominance by China
2) ‘Globalists’ are just people who can read.
Right on the first count.
Harper was willing to sign an International agreement that would’ve stopped domestic impediments to foreign investment.
Too bad TPP never happened.
Way back then I recall a report from a person that had read all of TPP.
There were 29 chapters – only 5 had to do with trade
Robert, holy sh**, people are finally catching up to an old man who has been screaming this s*** over more than one medium for decades. Too bad this old man never had a platform. Of course the terminally stupid never learn anything except destruction.
Would you mind not taking personal credit for an entire wave of thinking?
Why not, someone has to.
Steven Harper AKA Shit Head is not conservative. I give you proof. CBC. Need I say more?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/national-review-has-unconditionally-surrendered-to-same-sex-marriage/
(LifeSiteNews) — Until a few days ago, few people outside the offices of National Review knew that the revered conservative magazine’s publisher is a homosexual, “married” to a man.
Imagine actually thinking there’s anything wrong with this. Imagine being that much of a loser. Also, lol at the 5-part series devoted to the ‘problematic’ rise of LGBT influence in conservative circles. I’m sure it’s a very detailed account of homophobes getting their asses kicked intellectually and in the broader context of culture. Get used to it.
Its pretty funny that the left gets its panties in a twist when it comes to polygamy though.
Less ‘funny’ and more ‘bald-facedly hypocritical’.
For the short term (years) you’re probably right.
For the long term (decades) you’re probably wrong.
Nope. There’s no reason at all to believe that this victory is anything but permanent. It will spread across the whole world too.
History shows decadent times lead to collapse and then right wing common sense returns.
“When I hear the word culture I want to draw my revolver.”
And where are you on all the Islamic hate of Jews and LGBTQ or do they get a special pass from you because it doesn’t affect you?
Take it up with God when it’s your turn to get called to account.
Bill Maher to the right of some of these “conservatives” ?
Is this French character considered conservative?
If he is no longer and is in fact on the side of socialists/fascists, the issue is mute.
If others and himself consider themselves conservatives, they obviously are out of touch and are propagandists in disguise.
Thinking of the conservatives and their confused state in Alberta.
The same seem to have happened, the socialists/fascist extremists infested the conservative party like fleas (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flea) to suck on them to destruction.
They are remarkably successful.
You can see the results.
“If he is no longer and is in fact on the side of socialists/fascists, the issue is mute.”
Perhaps moot, but unfortunately not mute.
yes
It does prove that the biggest oxymoron in the world is HONOST POLITICIAN. The MSM is a close second.
My vote would be ‘social justice’.
Ben Shapiro
Jordan Pedorson
Joe the toe Rogan
Penis Dragger
Tim Fool
Dan Crenshaw
gatekeepers.
That right leaning people and worse any Christians even give these people anything beyond a single glance bewilders me.
They are moderators for the left.
To put a slimeball like Crenshaw in with any of these guys tells me you don’t know much about Crenshaw.
No, you`re wrong. They ARE conservatives. That`s the problem. Read Russell Kirk`s The Conservative Mind. Its all there, conservatives don`t stand for anything, its all a pose.
When EVERYONE is to the left of you you’re in a pretty small tent. The realities of governing requires that you have more than 10 followers.
The goal line is moved inches at a time, not half the field. The enemy has converted your neighbours and spouses and your kids teachers, if not your kids themselves. It just proves that the Left is waaay more politically savvy because they realize elections are all about the show and governance is this totally separate issue.
Conservatives waste all their energy evaluating each other with their little conservative measuring sticks and invariably declare everyone to be inadequate while the liberals cackle and chortle and continually run things.
Imagine labelling Stephen Harper a “so-called conservative”. There is not a single Canadian today that can match what he did, uniting the right and leading the country for 10 years in the face of adversity.
Meanwhile the die hards measure his “conservatism” and declare him, as all others, inadequate.
You give too much credit to the Left’s so-called political savvy. Asch and Milgram proved that humans are stupid emotional idiots. We all are. Everyone gets pulled into the simplest emotional manipulations of a movie or TV show.
The Communists know it’s a weakness and they utilize it. I wouldn’t call it savvy, I’d call it abuse.
However, you are right about Harper.
Human nature and democracy tend to lead people down this path.
The same decadence that Rome experienced while the empire collapsed is what we’re experiencing now.
Conservatism isn’t strong enough to hit the breaks. Collapse and right-wing extremism to follow is likely. It’ll take decades.
“There is not a single Canadian today that can match what he did, uniting the right and leading the country for 10 years in the face of adversity.”
Spare me. He got lucky, wallowed in mediocre authoritarianism, and then handed the game to Trudeau. If the NDP-Liberal vote split the way then as it does today, he would never have gotten his majority. Probably never even gotten into government.
Unite The Right was a disaster.
UnHinged Fever talk. You don’t know your ass from a hole in the ground.