60 Replies to “Looks Nice in the Outhouse Though”

    1. Considering the they never signed it they sure have profited greatly from it.

  3. Pierre was trolling us.
    He didn’t bury the but-we-can-override-anything-anytime-we-want clause toward the bottom, but at the very VERY top.
    My apology for the technical jargon but I’m sure you’ll puzzle it out.

    A TRUE and SINCERE charter would have this clause positioned ….. exactly nowhere in the document.

    1. Exactly. That little codicil effectively nullifies the entire document that follows. I knew it then I we experienced it the last two years.

      1. As did I. I knew that Notwithstanding whatever clause would become a problem when it was first proposed.

        Yep… I’ve been around that long, although in my younger, more naïve days, I fully threw myself into the (now provably false) belief that Canada needed a strong, central government, as opposed to the decentralized model proposed by the provinces, especially Quebec. As an anglophone living in Quebec at the time, you can understand my apprehension about giving the provinces more power.

        You see… I’m not ALWAYS right… :]

      2. Geez. Thoughts, fingers disconnect.

        *I knew it then and it was confirmed when we experienced it the last two years.

    2. Sad to see it has taken people so long to see what I saw the day it was shown to us. Another case of being able to say, I told you so, has zero gratification. By lawyers, of lawyers, for lawyers. We are destroying what is left of Canada at a hell of pace and the people are so dumb they don’t care.

  4. And yet, at least 20 years or more ago, I would tell people that they were at risk from the courts, particularly the Supreme Court, after it was allowed and encouraged to become an activist entity by the Constitution and people laughed at me. I told them that the Human Rights Code was not about human rights at all, and they laughed at me.

    No one with a brain is laughing now. The dictatorial nightmare is no longer fiction – it is reality and hardening every single day. And short of violence, I don’t see how it can be avoided because the population is well and truly asleep.

    1. Yes, “well and truly asleep”. Just say the word FREEDOM and they’ll think they’re entrapped in a right wing white supremacist nightmare.

    2. “No one with a brain is laughing now.”

      No one with a brain was laughing back then, either.

    3. Worse than asleep Codex – you could spend 100s of hours outlining the facts, and explain the ramifications – then prove your thesis based on predicted outcomes that prove the accuracy of your thesis – and they would double down in their resistance to accepting it.

      Brainwashed is what the majority of the population are.

      ” Good thing Ive had 4 jabs – imagine how sick I would have been if I hadnt been vaccinated. Hoping to get 5th as soon as I can”

      1. “It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled” – Mark Twain

        “The first principle is that you must not fool yourself – for you are the easiest person to fool” – Feynman

      2. I’ve beat my head against that wall enough with global warming so much that I don’t bother anymore. I have enough headaches without it.

    1. TRUE. Pierre’s purpose was to expunge rights. There’s no mention of the very wellspring of human rights and prosperity: PRIVATE PROPERTY.

  6. “ The architect of the charter, Pierre Trudeau’s highest priority was to blunt the Party Quebecois French-only education and language laws, which were creating an exodus of anglophone voters (and Liberal Party supporters) out of Quebec.”

    Perhaps.
    But the old turd also wanted to have a legacy other than being the perverted old socialist that divided the country.

  7. The Charter was designed to guarantee the entitlements of Pierre’s tribe.

    Actually settling the French Canadian question could have been done in 1763.

    1. Purge the élite, spiritual and temporal, of the former French régime.

    2. Offer status as British subjects to, and only to, those “Canadiens” willing to adopt the English language and Protestant faith.

    3. Get rid of the rest.

    4. Open the territory of the former hostiles to loyalist settlement, with veterans of the war given priority.

    Nothing short of that has ever settled a tribal dispute anywhere. They go on until one tribe or the other is destroyed.

    1. I wouldn’t go that far.
      Your step #3 could be misinterpreted to suggest something sinister akin to what happened in Germany during the 30’s and early 40’s.

      1. No, It’s exactly what happened to the Acadians who wouldn’t swear allegiance to the crown. They were deported to Louisiana. The ones who did stayed.

  8. I’d be a far bigger fan of the Charter if it proved to be an effective bulwark protecting individual rights.

    It hasn’t turned out that way. It’s proven too easy to override such protections by insisting that a restriction “can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society”.

    1. I have long since referred to Section 1 of the Charter as the “kill-switch” of the Charter.

      1. Cant that kill switch work both ways? Poilievre should commit to using the notwithstanding clause to ride herd over the activist courts. Over and over and over.

    1. Yeah, its whole validity is called into question in that the government of the second most populous province in Canada refused to ratify it (although that same government explicitly takes advantage of the Charter every time it invokes the Notwithstanding Clause).

      1. It is an act of the federal government. No future parliament is restrained by a prior parliament. This is the principle of parliamentary supremacy. The constitution act can be amended or trashed by any majority government.
        The concept of ratification by provinces was hokey from the get go. Not needed. Means nothing.

        1. “The constitution act can be amended or trashed by any majority government.”

          That statement is patently false.

          The Turdhole Charter has an “amending formula” that requires 50% of the population or a majority of Provinces to agree to any amendments… essentially it is not amendable.

          Peeair Turdhole did not even meet the requirements as laid out by the Supreme Court of that time which stated that vandalizing the BNA act and imposing constitutional change would require unanimous consent from the Provinces which Turdhole never received.

          1. Wrong. It is called the Constitution Act 1982. This was enacted by the federal parliament.
            Part I of this act contains the charter.
            Part V of this act specifies how to amend this act.
            What is to stop another federal parliament from simply revoking this act passed by another parliament 40 years ago?

          2. The UK parliament passed an act in 1982 (Canada Act) agreeing that it would not pass laws affecting Canada going forward. This too could be changed by the UK parliament in the future. Not that we’d care.

            The Constitution Act, 1982, included some amendments to the British North America Act. How can the Canadian parliament change an act that was and remains a part of Canada’s constitution? Answer: parliamentary supremacy.

            With your logic, if today’s parliament added a provision into the Income Tax Act that it may not be amended without 50% of provinces with 50% of population agreeing, that too would stand against any future parliament. It would not!

  12. How close is it to the Soviet one?

    and where were all the people that really should know better?

  13. One wonders if we were blessed with a real constitution instead of Trudeau’s (no elected politician should be allowed to craft what should be the citizens protection from politician’s advances against their natural rights – life, liberty, and property), would we still have sunk to the present near end-state democracy where the electorate have learned to vote for direct access to the treasury via politicians ambivalent to the indebtedness of the nation. All democracies eventually transition to tyrannies after reaching this point.

  14. Planning escape to Mexico currently. Easy to do, many have done this.
    We can still be parasites on the system, collecting Canuckistani pensions in the warmth of Busarius, while living a free life.
    I encourage everyone to do so as well, that qualifies. This is quickly becoming a third world welfare state, where the mandarins count on anyone with equity and investments, to stay and be slowly bled dry.
    Starve the BEAST.

    1. Not so easy for some of us who haven’t gotten jabbed. We’re still banned from planes, trains, and boats.

      1. fc, but not boats. e.g. I can take a ferry to Vancouver Island.

        This year, I may well do a lot of riding on the island in lieu of my favourite close by destination in WA state, especially the N Cascades Highway and the Olympic Peninsula. Sigh.

        1. Those aren’t the boats I’m referring to, just as I didn’t have commuter trains or subways in mind when I referred to trains, and I wasn’t talking about private small aircraft when thinking of planes.
          My fault. I should have been more explicit.

  15. anybody got a copy of the flic ‘1984’. any version will do. l just wanna get an idea what else is coming up,
    the rest of it so far is pretty accurate. herd mentality and all that. is someone confused with ‘herd mentality’
    and ‘herd immunity’? is it just me? are the 2 synonymous? hey. HEY. ya, youse. who’s got the program?

    1. There are Ukrainian members of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei which stopped collecting membership dues in 1945?

      Calling everyone you don’t like a NAZI is intellectually lazy and makes you sound stupid. Try to be more original.

      1. Try reading the article, moron. Oh, and maybe leave momma’s basement once in a while. You’ve had your fourth booster by now, right? You can always wear three masks.

        BTW, the source is Simon Wiesenthal Center. Feeling a little anti-semitic today, are we?

  17. Why waste time discussing IT and its equally worthless author. Burn it in the public square. Then get on with life ignoring all the brainless decrees and their authors.

  18. This is one of those articles where you say… well duh.

    The Turdhole Charter was imposed by a communist, Peeair Turdhole.

    The Turdhole Charter is an all out assault on individual rights ( there are none ) it ushers in the State sponsered, “group rights” racket.

    The Turdhole Charter puts the french speaker ( from Quebek ) in charge of the Government and gives them special protections and privilege’s that no other “group” is allowed.

    Tirdhole was a french language supremacist who used his bigotry to set up a nation that caters to the french speaker while leaving the English culture vulnerable and without any protections.

    Does the Turdhole Charter protect John A MacDonald and the Englisg culture as one of the founding “nations” written into the Turdhole Charter ? Does the Charter protect any historically English speaking person or cultural figure or cultural site ? No it does not !
    In fact it demonizes them and cancels them, try doing that to any french speaking historical figure and see how fast the french language gangsters of the french language racket descend upon you with the full force of, “the Turdhole Charter”.

    Turdhole did not care about the so called Quebek anglo and stated so many times he simply thought that the bigots of the separatist movement thought to small. Why force Quebek to speak french when you can force the whole country to be french, that was Turdholes goal.

    Today the citizens of e-nazi Canada still can’t speak french despite the trillions of taxpayer dollars thrown at the french language racket since its imposition in 1969 and its subsequent protections under the Turdhole Charter. Canada is still largely an English speaking nation ( post nation State ) by population, but make no mistake the french speaking Quebeker rules over this land by running every Government department designated as “bilingual” ( french ) which includes the Supreme Court.

    Peeair needed the “separatists” so he could pretend to save Canada by forcing french on the whole nation.
    Look at the spawns cabinet and see who holds the power, look at the Courts, look at the Supreme Court where french is now mandatory even when not hearing cases that are related to the french language.

    The Turdhole Charter doesn’t protect individual Canadians, never has and never will because that was not its purpose.

    The purpose of the imposed Turdhole Charter was to destroy Canada as an English speaking nation with historically English speaking institutions, like the Supreme Court and Parliament. It set up a system that destroyed the notion of Common Law and put the french Quebeker in charge of everything.

    Institutional and “constitutional” bigotry.

    British Columbia spends over a 100 million dollars every 12 Months on the french language rackets, if they didn’t an unelected Court Judge would sweep down hard with condemnation and punishment, so would the corrupt Media and the politicians who benefit from the french language racket and of course Quebekers who tell everyone else to mind their own business when it comes to Queerbek, but gladly interfere in Provinces that have zero significant history of french language. British Columbia is an English speaking Province, french is spoken by a very small minority ( 0.001 % ) but has special rights granted to the racket by the Courts through the imposition of the Turdhole Charter.

    The sinister nature of the Turdhole Charter and the damage that it continues to inflict while offering up zero protections for rights and freedoms for Canadians is how the thing was designed. It is no coincidence that the Turdhole Charter reads almost exactly the same as the Soviet Charter… that is by design.

    If only Joe Klark wasn’t such an anti Canadian fool the Turdhole Charter would never have been imposed.

    The Turdhole Charter is also as anti democratic as it gets. The people were never asked to accept or reject the Turdhole Charter, the citizen was not involved in this revolution.

    The imposition of the Turdhole Charter is the main reason why Canada is circling the toilet bowl today and the devious mendacious little commie that imposed it knew the damage that it would cause and so did every Premier and so did every Cabinet Minister.

    The imposition of the Turdhole Charter was anti democratic , anti Canadian, anti English , anti individual, it was an end of freedom and the successful end of a revolution led by bigots and communists from french speaking Queerbek. It destabilized the nation with top down undemocratic court rule activism and vandalized the nation further with bigoted and racial social engineering schemes designed to divide and imposed by the unelected unaccountable Courts.

    Under the Turdhole Charter the Courts became a political party ideologically aligned and forever associated with the corrupt Liberal Party.
    Through the fake pandemic we saw how the Turdhole Charter was useless at protecting citizens from Government tyranny and lawlessness and every politician ( except for Peckford, delusional ) every bureaucrat, every Judge, and every asshole in the Media knew this would be the case. The Charter is like the man who imposed it , a total fraud and not at all what people believe it to be.
    It is a sinister document of the State by the State and for the State.

    Canada needs to end.

    2. One of the worst things that ever happened to Canada was Quebec not separating after the last referendum.

        1. I did vote, and I voted in favor of Canada at the time. If I only knew then what I was voting for.
          I also now regret that Quebec didn’t vote “yes,” but if it had, I probably would not have ever been able to escape, just like I am unable to escape this clown show of a country today.

  19. Pierre The Idiots gift to us was always a lie.
    Dread Covid Theatre and the reign of The Spawn have just proven what most of us already knew.
    Toilet paper used to hide the theft of our actual rights and freedoms.

    Did anyone really think a Devoted Draft Dodger,Nazi Supporter and Communist Lover was going to leave the citizens God Given Rights and Freedoms as British Freemen intact?

    The “Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms” is a fraud.
    Another verified Government Lie.

    And Our Comrades from “Good Government” are more than happy to call us property and deny we have any right to live,unmolested by their kind.

    Now the simple fact that our bureaucrats and politicians are comfortable treating us taxpayers as property,is reason enough for retribution.

    When all hope is gone.
    Your every ambition and last dollar lost to Government obstruction and theft.
    You have no future..
    Then warm your soul with spreading the pain.

    We can do very little about the State of Thuggery that currently steps on us,the Debt created in our name exceeds any possibility of being paid.
    And the rate of theft by our Parasitic Overload increases daily.

    Canada is broken beyond repair.
    Reform?
    That turned out to be impossible.
    Retribution?
    Oh Yeah.
    We can,having abandoned all hope of building any value,seek to reward those who brought us to this pass.

    A key plank of the Revenge and Retribution Party,the digging up of Pierre the Idiots bones and hang him for treason,strip all his descendants of any wealth and then exile them as Spawn of Scum.

    Imagine if we could hold our employees to account..

    You run a small business,you discover,near retirement age that your employees have borrowed impossible debt,in your name.
    That they have systemically lied to you from the day you hired them.
    Your retirement plans are destroyed.
    And now?
    They insist you owe them a pension..for their “service”..
    Sweet Gig eh?
    That is your government.

  20. Hasn’t the Junior Turd invalidated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms ? Where’s my right to private property ? Nine Judges rule this country.

    1. The Spawn-Fuhrer’s father ensured that property rights were not part of his Charter. Property rights being the basis of most all rights are particularly toxic to the statist mind. The nine judges rule against almost anyone challenging the leftist spin (group rights) inherent in the Charter.

  21. I happened to be in Ottawa that day, and played hooky from work to go see the ceremony. It was a cold April afternoon, and the skies overhead were the sullen grey that seems to permeate the Ottawan soul. The crowd was smaller than I’d thought it might be, and the ceremony was similarly restrained.

    Betty, as always, was perfect. Her remarks were uniformly positive, and stressed how she shared our excitement at this next step in the Canadian journey. They were received with warmth and affection. She then turned the podium over to Pierre.

    I only remember one thing about that. I don’t remember a word of what he said. His English speech was delivered in that banal monotone some of us remember and detest, and I don’t recall a single memorable phrase. I understand from others that his French remarks were delivered from the heart, and that Pierre himself spent hours on his French oration, but his English one was written by the PMO. Regardless, as a monophone, his French words meant nothing to me, and his English ones, not much more.

    But I do remember one thing vividly, and I chuckled a bit at the time. As I mentioned, the skies were threatening, but they held off during Liz’s remarks. But just a few moments after Pierre took the mike, as he stood before the crowd to finally complete his heart’s mission, and bask in the glory as the man who brought the Constitution home, it began to rain.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation