Come Back Pizzagate!

All is forgiven.

It’s now clear why the Biden administration does not want this side of [SCOTUS nominee] Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s history to get out. Jackson’s record shielding child predators from the punishment and justice they deserve should trouble every sane person. Judge Jackson went to bat for those who prey on the most vulnerable members of society. Judge Jackson must explain herself at her upcoming hearing. If she fails to adequately justify her disturbing record, every senator who votes for her must be held accountable,” said Mike Davis, Founder and President of the Article III Project.

According to the A3P research, Ketanji Brown Jackson consistently said sentences and punishments for sex offenders generally were too harsh and stigmatizing. Specifically, when she worked on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Jackson declared that mandatory minimums for sex offenders targeting children as “excessively severe and might be applied inconsistently.” Additionally, she believed reforms for these minimums will “bring these guidelines into the 21st century,” in spite of several reforms to the law already enacted during the 21st century. The full research document can be found here.

Via

24 Replies to “Come Back Pizzagate!”

    1. For all of dads and moms that love to stay home to take care of their loved ones,
      or rest of people on the search for an opportunity to pull in some extra income for their family month after month let me share a remarkable opportunity to explore.
      HERE →→→→→→ https://t.ly/FuSv

  1. The Empire of Lies is run by a pedophile cabal. That is why the Empire finds the notion of Russian sovereignty—or the sovereignty of any nation—abhorrent. In countries where men govern themselves, pedophiles are swiftly put to death.

  2. When a woman is worried about minimum mandatory sentencing for monsters then somebody braver than me should be checking up her robe.

  3. *sigh*

    From the “report”, which none of you bothered to read:

    Congress established new mandatory minimums for penalties for existing offenses, most notably by requiring at least a 5 year sentence for receipt and distribution of child pornography.

    You’re not allowed to bitch when your 16-year-old daughter sends nude selfies to her 17-year-old boyfriend and they both go to jail for five years and end up on a sex offender registry for life. Lest you think that’s an exceptional case, it’s already happened multiple times in the US. It’s also how the Rehtaeh Parsons case got dragged up out of the bin and turned into a mythology about “bullying”. There’s a reason mandatory minimum sentencing is considered a bad idea. Like when they tried it with firearms, and the result was more dead cops because facing a mandatory minimum sentence more felons decided to go out in a blaze of glory rather than surrender.

    People’s brains fall out the back of their head whenever sex crimes or crimes involving children are the topic. And the police and the judiciary know this. The militarized police, the federal police agencies, the judiciary don’t suddenly become paragons of honesty and integrity just because they’re investigating k*ddie Pr0n instead of truckers.

    1. Daniel, she is being criticized for letting convicted child predators off with light sentences and with suggesting the minimum sentences for these offenders needs to be revisited. I tried to investigate these criticisms for your sigh relief but the Internet has gone full defender of this woman, which makes me even more suspicious of her. Why not list all her sentencing decisions for the world to judge. Instead there are 10 positive message news articles and one silly article by Republicans – no facts.

      Your comment references Congress and not the woman in question. Not sure where you were going with that.

      1. She also supports critical race theory…telling little white kids that they are born evil racists.

        on top of being lenient on pedophiles.

        But hey ! she is black and female ! so everything is fine !

    2. Another reason not to send someone nude pictures of yourself. Actually, minors would, in most cases, fall within the juvenile system not the adult system. The states have jurisdiction over criminal law unless it crosses state lines.

    3. Daniel,

      you will probably never see this but today Monday March 21 , we have learned that the Biden white house is withholding 48,000 pages of documents on Kentaji Jackson.

      What are Democrats afraid of? what is so horrible about her that it must be hidden?

      Are you still so sure she is just worried teens sending each other sexy pics might get a criminal record?

  4. Wasn’t the head of public education in Ontario arrested on child pornography charges about 10 years ago? Try googling that one. Crickets.

    1. Kathleen Wynne’s bestie Ben Levin. She backpedalled and claimed he wasn’t instrumental in the the be a sex ed curriculum but before that she paraded him around and bragged about his credentials. The Liberals love diddlers.

    2. Steve….too true

      Benjamin Levin if I recall correctly, not only a Pedophile but the guy who totally rewrote the Ontario Sex Education curriculum…to the point where Anal Sex would have been Taught in schools…he was Deputy Education minister I believe…one working under that Commie Beotch Kathleen Whyne.

      Levin being your run of the mill Degenerate inbred POS, in his case, deserving of a 15′ of hemp rope.

  5. Additionally, she believed reforms for these minimums will “bring these guidelines into the 21st century,” in spite of several reforms to the law already enacted during the 21st century.

    _______________________________________________________

    This is just odd. It’s reversed. Minimum sentencing brought into the guidelines of the 21st century would logically increase since culture changed from previous centuries, but not in a fashion that would accept these relationships. Just the contrary. Were we to time travel back to the 1600’s and 1700’s, there would be a “valid” argument to relax the mandatory minimum sentencing since marriages (hence, relationships) were more centered around the pragmatic. Marrying very young was not an outlandish occurrence…as it would be considered today.

    There is something very odd about her position…and it would make more sense if it wasn’t her position but “her’s by proxy.”

    1. At least Pee Wee Herman took care of himself … without abusing children. May I suggest this is most typical of the leftist pedophiles.

    2. Jimmy Savile would be proud.

      “Well then well then! 13 and still a virgin? Jim’ll fix it!”

  6. I’m earning 85 dollars/h to complete some work on a home computer…~oy140~I not at all believed that it can be possible but my close friend earning $25k only within four weeks simply doing this top task as well as she has satisfied me to PAY…~oy140~Check further details by reaching this site

    …>>>>>> http://bizprofit24.tk/

Navigation