13 Replies to “Covid Cannon Fodder”

    2. Listening to Dowd reminds me of the early Covid days when the case/death stats started being published. Mathematician hubby would crunch the numbers each morning over coffee and we would postulate about what was really going on because the numbers did not at all portray a “death wave” virus happening. The biggest tool the government/health experts used was omission, it still is. Never any context was given for anything, so the numbers were meaningless.

  3. Compensation does not replace the effects of ill health caused by a foreign substance that was injected into your body.

  4. Vladimir Putin never realeased a bio-terror agent into the environment.

    He never forced anybody to submit to being jabbed with an experimental vaccine that was as dangerous as it was useless.

    So far, the Russian forces in Ukraine have liquidated a few hundred Nazis. Most of the damage to infrastructure has been by Nazi saboteurs.

    Wuhan flu has killed six million people in two years, not counting the people poisoned with rabbit-shit vaccines.

    The people who “stand with Ukraine” were the ones who “followed the science.” Do not listen to them. Make them listen to you, with a knife to the throat if necessary.

    Tell them: You lie.

    And we refuse to die for your lies.

    1. “So far, the Russian forces in Ukraine have liquidated a few hundred Nazis.”

      You know, I always thought it was the Nazis that did the attacking thing instead of sitting there waiting to be attacked.

      1. Remember Kids, Everyone You Disagree With is LITERALLY a German 30s era National Socialist.

        That is how open and free discussion works. If you don’t believe my claims, well, refer line one above!

  6. In Australia the government has set up compensation process for anyone screwed over by Jab ‘adverse events’.

    Yet still actively promote it for everyone with a free arm and allow status based discrimination.

    So, anyone like to name any other industry that would be allowed to continue functioning if they had a produce that was know to cause health risks?

    Anyone like to muse over the Ford Pinto? Remember, with the Pinto the car wasn’t even dangerous relative to other vehicles of similar size and role and has been argued that in its class it was actually one of the safest.

    Ford weren’t screwed over because the car was a death trap, they were screwed over because the investigated a method of further reducing risk with the product, but decided it was going to be cheaper to pay damages to any victims over the next couple of years compared with making the design changes immediately. They knew, they could have, they decided to delay based on a cost analysis.

    Also remember that if you agree to a waver you are basically saying ‘Hey, there might be problems, there might not, but let us take the risk now rather then delay for more testing’. This is coverage against the unknown problems.

    Once a problem becomes known do you really think this original waver still covers you? Under what legal, moral and ethical grounds do you think you are protected against continuing to use a product that has been discovered to be unsafe?

  8. TAT that is so very true. If they lie to you about one thing they will lie to you about another.
    I have become aware of 15 people suffering now with adverse reactions. Some our own family members. Some going to emerge several times.

  9. Ran across a good one today.
    Just when you think the covid crap can’t get any dumber or the people any dumber. Here it is, right between the eyes.
    PFIZER PUSHING DRUG TO TREAT HEART CONDITIONS CAUSED BY COVID JABS.
    Now tell me, just who the stupid people are?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation