From the Youtube comments;
As a neuroscientist who has worked with rodents for over a decade, I can offer my limited perspective. We are trained and re-trained every few years based on latest research available and have always been taught to aspirate for all injections, regardless of the substance being injected. Injecting any substance into a blood vessel that isn’t supposed to be there is generally not healthy for the organism. Depending on the substance, it can also be quite harmful, e.g if it travels to the brain or other organs in too high of a dose too quickly. As the saying goes, the dose makes the poison. As such, strict adherence to a given route of administration is of paramount importance.
In my view, There is no reason not to aspirate except to save the half-second it takes to aspirate. Furthermore, if aspirating makes the patient feel more comfortable then the physician should honor their request.
Western medicine has a dark history of traditionalist thinking and neglect toward new ideas which has led to several issues throughout the history of medicine, and still persist to this day. These include slowing down research or preventing progress on implementing treatments due to bio-deterministic theories, which oftentimes do not play out as theory predicts. We saw this all throughout the pandemic with hydrochloroquine, ivermectin, etc.
Furthermore, and in my eyes even more troubling, is that this behaviour deeply damages patient trust and the doctor-patient relationship, which is obviously detrimental to patient well being and recovery, regardless of the circumstances. We see this quite regularly in terms of patient adherence to doctor advice, medication regimens, etc.
Doctors need to be aware of this and take proactive steps to over-communicate with patients and take their specific needs into account, particularly during this era of personalized medicine that has been promoted and strived for in recent decades. Not only would this compassion for patients give the average patient confidence in their doctors, likely increasing Vax rates during these challenging times, but also ultimately help build patient trust and break down the power dynamic that naturally exists in any doctor-patient relationship.
The reason that US medical practice is to not aspirate has nothing to do with the time (and a little bit of skill) required, but the fact that if no blood is drawn, the whole thing is supposed to be scrapped and started again with a fresh syringe/dose.
Think of all those $$$$$$$$$$$$.
Are a few poor outcomes really that much of a problem? After all, the same medical institutions will make yet more money treating them.
I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45 to 85 per/h. Without Ret a my doubt, this is the pay easiest and most financially GFYC rewarding job I’ve ever had. I actually started 6 months ago and this has totally
changed my life………… http://homejob34.tk/
I may be wrong, but is it not the opposite outcome that matters? if blood is drawn by aspirating, then that syringe is discarded and a fresh syringe is used?
In this case, yes, you are right. It’s supposed to be an intra-muscular injection, so it is NOT supposed to go directly into the bloodstream. There are also other drugs which ARE supposed to go directly into the bloodstream, not into muscle or fat, which can be verified by looking for blood.
I would go back and fix the post … but my time is up.
Point still stands though. It’s a cost saving measure, which might just have a side effect of creating new business.
The syringe and vaccine is tossed if blood appears, not the other way around.
Philip, can that be right?
If so — if, say, 10x in a row no blood is drawn, the syringe would have to replaced 10x.
See my correction above – the COVID vaccine is intra-muscular, so in that case, you are NOT supposed to see blood.
But to your point – yes. See blood (or not, as appropriate for the type of injection you are giving) 10x, and you start over 10x.
Then go on a remedial “How to jab 101” training course.
“As a neuroscientist who has worked with rodents for over a decade” – I read that and thought it was another Justin story.
Fear can also cause a metallic taste in the mouth.
In another video Dr. Campbell presents a graph that showed the occurrence of myocarditis in males under the age of 40. He stated that after age 40 myocarditis is statistically none existent. Around the age of 20 it was surprisingly prevalent, at that point he paused for a few seconds and then said for effect “I will just leave it at that”. My reading of his inference was (Campbell in his 60s is fully vaccinated) that he wanted to say young males had better be aware of the risks of vaccinations to their age group. My guess is he knew if he stated it out in the open that YouTube would have pulled his channel so he has to parse his words carefully.
Before the vaccines were rolled out there were reports of myocarditis associated with covid. That conversation seems to have disappeared. The new questions would be:
How have the numbers of myocarditis changed since the arrival of covid?
How do we separate what is covid-related and vaccine-related?
Just because something is “rare” doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. I had a gun to my head and was forced to get the jabs in order to cross the border (which I had to do). However, thanks to SDA, I insisted that the injector aspirate and neither had any problem doing so. Neither were aware there might be a problem. Although I could be wrong, I don’t believe it’s necessary that you switch to a new syringe if there is no blood drawn.
Dr. Campbell covered this topic back in September.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgVsd6qoyU4
If no blood is drawn then the injection proceeds, if blood is drawn then the needle is removed and the process is repeated. As I understand Dr. Campbell’s caution, if blood is drawn then the needle is in a vein or artery in which case the injected material is immediately placed in the circulatory system thereby creating a problem.
This is very common; during an externship at a pediatric clinic no one aspirated the needle when doing injections. On top of that, they ignored the type of injection. Some childhood vaccinations are to be intramuscular and some subcutaneous; they would just jab it in and push the plunger. I found it very disturbing, especially given both I and one of my children had adverse reactions to certain vaccinations. Who knows how those little bodies would react.
The CDC changed its aspiration guidelines less than a decade ago.
L – If the medical graduates, running the Public Health system, don’t know the basics of the vascular system, as per Gray’s Anatomy, how did they manage to graduate?
Politically correct ideology(Cult. Marxism) has replaced competency in the Canadian
and U.S. education system, including to a degree, into the STEM fields. That explains a lot. Especially the info war/persecution against competent, honest physicians and researchers by medical regulatory bodies and medical colleges.
It will take two generations to rebuild trust in the mismanaged medical system, starting from whenever those reforms begin(if ever) in Canada and the U.S. of A. ,
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal 2.0 is a prerequisite.
The divergence from standard practices due to the Wuhan virus is significant and troubling. First, the total ignoring of natural immunity which has as much to do with following the science as witchcraft. Ignoring or cancelling therapeutics is bizarre. Minimal and non-transparent vaccine testing smells of cronyism. Locking down the healthy instead of the sick is another first. Non-aspiration and ignoring adverse reactions. For example, the Swine Flu vaccine was pulled after less than a hundred cases of Guillian-Barre syndrome from the vaccination of 25% of US population while US Vaers reported to date for Covid is more than 3/4 million which could be less than half of actual adverse reactions. And last but not least, bio-apartheid and government coerced neo-fascist discrimination based on personal choice.
It’s almost as if there is an agenda that has nothing to do with public health.
SO, if we supervise the needle giver, and insist that he/she aspirate and show us the blood free tube and only plunge when we say GO then we can confidently go ahead and get the experimental gene edit injection with fraudulent Pfizer efficacy claims (95% vs. actual ARR of 1%) and all is okay. We could even caution the needle giver and possibly have our spouse or friend take an iPhone video.
Sorry, I just can’t shake the feeling that he’s a pharma shill, albeit a very subtle one to be sure.
Many people would infer from this that the number of injuries from this single non-vaccine that equals All THE INJURIES FROM ALL VACCINATIONS OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS are all due to a sudden failure to asperate; that they are “safe and effective”.
Doesn’t this sound like misdirection.
This guy is crank and your misinformation kills people.
And yet you’re still here. Any idea when that kicks in?
Is that a strong chemical taste in your mouth, or are you just glad to see me?
Well as long as it’s not a suddenly developed twitch or stutter in the next couple of years all should be good!
Don’t forget to keep abreast of the latest literature on “signs of strokes and heart attacks in children!”
Have a safe day!
Up to I saw the check four $6520, I be certain that…my… neighbors mother LAp like they say truly receiving money in their spare time on their apple laptop.. there best friend started ool doing this 4 less than nineteen months and at present cleared the loans on there apartment and bought a new Mazda. navigate to this web-site…… http://payment01.tk/