Safe And Effective ®

Sask Health did a funny thing the other day.

This is how their Covid dashboard looked on October 21st. (Image is from a previous post.)

And this is how it looks today.

The “unvaccinated” now share a category with the newly vaccinated. Why would they do such a thing?

(I’ll let you finish yesterday’s math on your own.)

Related: This is what a real breakthrough infection report should look like.

42 Replies to “Safe And Effective ®”

  1. Because it’s long been well known that the vaccine takes a couple of weeks to become effective, maybe? We have known that since the first trials.

    The breakthrough report is well enough, and it’s true that you are not “immune” if you get the jab, but that report leaves out the rate at which vaccinated people are getting sick vs the rate at which unvaxxed people are getting sick.

    You know, the part that shows how effective the jab actually is. Can’t show that!

    1. Unvaccinated should means zero shots. Zero. Period.

      They could easily add new columns in the database to accurately measure sub groups of the vaccinated. They obviously don’t want to be honest or accurate.

    2. The vaccinated are ” getting sick” at an alarming rate — just not necessarily Covid. (see my comment below) . You should also check out the Testimonies project from Israel:
      https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/
      Risk of dying from Covid in the general population is extremely low.

      1. My son (the one who suffered from myocarditis after shot #2) just texted me to tell me he has the flu….well he thinks the flu, he is awaiting Covid test results.

    3. And it also used to be a supposed 14 days until efficacy while in SK it appears it is now up to 21 days required.

      1. “Of the 142 persons in whom myocarditis developed within 21 days after the first dose of vaccine or within 30 days after the second dose, 136 received a diagnosis of definite or probable myocarditis, 1 received a diagnosis of possible myocarditis, and 5 had insufficient data.”
        https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2109730

        Hmmmm….look at that, the NEJM study of myocarditis after the covid vaccine uses the time period of 21 days after first vaccination. What a coincidence.

  2. Why would they do it? They don’t want people knowing the real numbers. Alberta pulls the same stuff. Think about it, in order to report the group “unvaccinated or <21 days” you need to check was the person vaccinated, then check if they were, how many days was it since vaccination, then filter out the <21 days and add them back to the unvaccinated totals before releasing to public. It’s an extra step to add the two columns back together and makes no sense unless you are trying to hide the vaccinated <21 days info.

    Also, why 21 days? Your screen shots from before showed 14 days as a separate category. That is a CLEAR flag that people are getting sick in the 14-21 day period, so what’s the answer? I know! Let’s group them in with those dirty anti-vaxxers!

    Lots of other tricks. When they set a target of 60% to reopen and guaranteed that we’d be open for Stampede, the eligible population was adjusted downward until they hit 60%. They couldn’t get the numerator to go up fast enough so they made the denominator go down. I think the population of Alberta dropped by 50,000 that week so we could hit 60%

    Or, when reporting on how few people who have been vaccinated have got really sick/died, they report from Dec 16, 2020(Government of Canada) or January 1, 2021(Alberta, think they changed this date recently). The problem is that until about April 2021, less than 5% of the population was vaccinated. And therefore 100% of deaths could be reported as unvaccinated people. And there was a huge wave of cases in that December-March period. Including that time frame when reporting % of deaths in vaccinated people gave the unvaccinated category a huge head start to run up the numbers and make the vaccines appear WAY more effective then they really were….and the unvaccinated appear worse.

    Lots of other tricks out there. One I expect to see…with boosters becoming normal (they are up to a fourth shot in some populations of the US) expect them to start classifying people who have waited too long since their last shot as “unvaccinated”.

    1. And one more reason to change…if you change your reporting methods, observers who are using your numbers to track trends can’t make accurate conclusions, because the data sets are incompatible.

      Haha. Noticed Sask forgot to change the definition of what constitutes vaccinated for the second dose…they left that as a 14 day post jab time frame when they should have changed it to 21 days to be consistent with how they are defining unvaccinated.

      The Oregon report is nice. Wish everyone would report that way.

  3. Nonvax/new vax = 164 new cases minus 62 kids = 102
    Suppose 25 of those are are in the recent vax group, then there are 77 non-vax cases, which is less than half of the 161 total new cases over 12 years.
    The non-vax people are not the ones driving the covid pandemic.

    1. In Ontario we have over 80% fully vaxxed which leaves 20% un-vaxxed.

      The vaxxed have more liberties and freedoms than the un-vaxxed (no mask no social distancing etc. if they desire) they feel as if they are protected so they are not concerned with getting a bad case of COVID, and they do not care if they pass on COVID to an un-vaxxed.

      If a vaxxed person gets COVID the first thing they do is blame the un-vaxxed because of the messaging from the government and the media.

      Most of the vaxxed agree with a split society / family whatever you want to call it.

      Government and media have created this and again most people believe this is all caused by the un-vaxxed.

      The narrative is if everyone is vaxxed this will all go away and we will be back to normal, HAHA.

      I am sure the un-vaxxed are doubling down on trying to stay safe and not acquire COVID, whereas the vaxxed I am not so sure.

      My question is WHO is actually spreading the virus?

      Have you watched a home game for the Maple Leafs, see what is going on in the stands.

      1. The vaxxed are vaxxed against nothing. I am sick of the lying a holes who keep promoting the lies and the experimental drugs. They deserve to be jailed for their crimes. The damn virus had a 0.26 percent fatality rate, just what the hell is it now with the vaxxed spreading disease faster than Doug Ford can tell a lie.

        1. VOWG…yep.
          Vaxxing a population that was more than likely already at ~ 80%+ IMMUNE bk in Oct 2019.

          ChiCOM State televised utter kabuki BULLSHIT of monster fogging machines, folks literally dropping dead (conveniently in front of camera’s), on the streets… stories of crematoria running 24/7 with supposed tens of thousands of bodies stacked up.

          Two weeks of the above and the Entire population of the Western world was 100% convinced …this is the BLACK DEATH redux..!!!! ..and yet, on 2 Fully Quarantined ships with ~10,000 folks (mostly over 70 yrs of age on the Diamond Princess). Only 15 died in total.

          That was the TRUE PETRI DISH of this shitshow.
          THAT FACT simply never ever, got any traction whatsoever…CAUSE it did not fit the Globalist Genocide/Profiteering cause.

          NOPE, the herd took to SCREAMING for A VAX…..the powers that be simply SMILED and said…OK, here ya go – have at er….!! And instantly created a distinct class of humans with AIDS – needing Boosters till the day they expire & providing a mass of human slaves to boot..

          The Globalists..?? Laughing all the way to the BANK as they drive past their Creamtoria.

  4. The whole purpose is to manipulate the populace. They do it by polluting the data. They do it by moving the goal posts. They do it by gradually changing the metrics they report (cases, deaths, hospitalizations, percentages, …). Current trends are easier for an individual to track and comprehend than a slew of historical details.

    As a general rule of thumb, they always lie–even when they tell the truth, it is to hide a bigger lie.

  5. Because the vaccines don’t work?
    Getting the flu is hit and miss. Survival depends on overall health and acquired immunity. Did you get regular flu shots even though you were healthy?
    I see the stat (insert random percentage here) effective regarding flu vaccines. Per one hundred people vaccinated, 65 get the flu. Experts will claim 35% effective when in reality the effectiveness is totally unknown. Not everyone get the flu! That’s the unstated flaw in the “effective” claim.

    It would be an interesting exercise to examine the medical records of all deaths. We’re the deceased regular recipients of flu shots? Is acquired immunity from the flu, better than a flu shot? Logic would say yes. History would side with logic.
    The Spanish flu predominantly killed the previously healthy. Those who had previous exposure to similar viruses did just fine. Those who skipped through life,” never sick a day in my life!” didn’t fare so well.
    I’ll skip the jab thank-you very much, and take my chances with mother nature. She likes me the way she made me.
    BTW I’m not anti-vax, but I am anti-stupid.
    I’ll gladly sit this one out and see how many of the jabbed die from the gene manipulation treatment, made with absolutely no access to the original source material.
    F@#k China and their apologists
    Almost forgot,
    Let’s Go Brandon!

  6. As to mixing the recently vaccinated in with the unvaccinated, that’s a good way to put your thumb on the scale. One of the things we’ve seen everywhere that mass vaccination campaigns have been rolled out is a noticeable increase in case numbers that then drops off a few weeks later. So tracking the numbers this way makes the unvaccinated look worse and the vaccinated look better.

    1. Proper tracking would be:
      1. unvaccinated
      2. one shot, less than 14 days
      3. one shot, more than 14 days
      4. two shots, 2nd one less than 14 days
      5. two shots, 2nd one more than 14 days
      6. more than two shots

      SK is putting 1. and 2. together (with 2 being 21 days not 14 days). I’m guessing the Oct. 21 had this in there already and were just not clear that they had tainted the control group. It is clear now that it is tainted. Where do you think 2 were on Oct. 21st? They weren’t in any vaccinated category. It looks like they have 3 and 4 together too and 5 and 6 together.

  7. Noticed a similar habit in the reporting.
    New cases get reported with the caveat “unvaccinated or status unknown”
    Either they are or they are not.
    Using the “unknown” as a way to keep from saying vaccinated.

    I’ve identified an associated symptom that is exhibited by those beneficiaries of the lock down.
    Just need a name for it.

      1. The status unknown category drives me crazy. How in the world are they able to issue these passports if they don’t seem to know the status of most of the “cases”? Did not (and will not) get jabbed, but I assume they ask for your health card?

  8. Very simple fact – the refusal to have the truly unvaccinated as a separate group, meaning zero shots, proves that governments are 100% manipulating the data set.

    Why? It lumps all of the immediately suffered vaccine injuries into the unvaccinated group.This is obscuring the damage done by the vaccine and can be used to blame the unvaccinated for the hospitalizations.

    You don’t use this kind of data manipulation if you’re attempting to be honest. It’s been nothing but various types of lies about covid and covid vaccines for 18 months.

  9. The numbers are still there to be able to perform the same calculation to determine what percentage of fully vaccinated people are in the group that came down with covid. (which I do daily and see that over the last few months it has increased from around usually 20% to between 25-30%)

  10. Under the Related: break through section on Twitter. Read the comments. Leftists today are truly insane. There is no coming together with these people. Civil war or a break up of our country seems inevitable.

    1. I am noticing a hyper sensitivity occurring on many levels in the last couple of days. The rhetoric in the media must be cranked to maximum.

      I wonder if it’s intent is to create strong and malicious division as families start planning American thanksgiving and Christmas. This is how it played out in my personal experience.

  11. Maybe the shot has a difference purpose all together …. Others have observed a lot of strange junk in the goo.

  12. I have been privy to a private text a patient sent to their chiropractor. I am using it with permission after removing any personal information

    The Chiropractor had checked in with the patient after patient was rushed by ambulance to hospital with upper body paralysis and myocarditis after receiving a second vaccine dose.

    Side note, patient unwillingly took the vax so they could take the flight to adopt a child with Down syndrome from the Ukraine. Patient’s change in health status has now put the adoption in limbo.

    Anyway, here is the patient’s text to their chiropractor (and friend). It is laced with sarcasm and in a casual writing style one would use when writing to a friend, it is not medical writing.

    “It was just one very safe shot and I was going to feel crappy for a day or two.

    6.5 weeks later my cardiologist calls today to tell me there is STILL inflammation which is now in my pericardium, so he’s faxing over prescriptions I’ll need to take for a min of 3 months. But good news, he is seeing a few patients a day with these reactions and this treatment regime is very effective.

    Also he reminded me to make sure I don’t exercise or push myself physically in anyway for the next 6 months, because my risk of sudden death is apparently significantly elevated during that timeframe. You have to be able to laugh.

    He said they are currently investigating over 5,000 physician reported cases of this over the last 7 months. I haven’t heard a whisper of that in the news, so logically this must mean it’s fake and my cardiologist is a conspiracy theorist. It’s 2021 after all and journalists ( I use that term SO loosely) are the new medical specialists/experts. You don’t actually have to spend 15 years in medical school anymore. All you need is a journalism degree and a laptop and your basically an immunologist, epidemiologist, cardiologist, you can change your specialty from story to story.

    Let’s def make these mandatory. And it seems perfectly reasonable that they are asking me to volunteer all my kids so they can play Russian roulette with their bodies too.

    On a less sarcastic but equally serious note: the Bioethics of making decisions for other humans bodies (yes I’m talking about children) involving a substance not only without sufficient safety data, but also one that does not have even close to comparable efficacy as the normal childhood va**ines, should have been analyzed with a systematic approach using the four principles of biomedical ethics that has been the dominant framework for global bioethics since 1979.

    There is no academic evidence available”

    1. Very powerful story. Gets at the crux of the problem. The vaccines have not been adequately tested, people are bring pressured to take them, and the media is MIA. Appalling.

  13. One category column that should be part of this chart is “Unvaccinated/recovered”

    I want to know, how many unvaccinated people, who have recovered from Covid, get reinfected with Covid, or die from contracting it a second time. To me, that would be statistical science, and important health information.

    I sense the column might be zeros, all the way down the various age groups.

    Do they have this information, and just not making it public?

    1. Exactly.
      But that would reveal how effective natural immunity is.
      Can’t have that.
      And these fascist losers rant about misinformation.

  14. First off, everyone agrees Saskatchewan Health can provide all the proper numbers within their proper context. The people of Saskatchewan are responsible enough to look at the unvarnished numbers/statistics with a responsible eye. The politicians are not the ones playing funny bugger games with the numbers. This is coming from the bureaucrats within Saskatchewan Health.

    The reason I say “bureaucrats” rather than “politicians” is the way the bureaucracy deals with those healthcare workers who choose not to be vaccinated. The frontline healthcare workers know what they are dealing with in COVID. It is reasonable to expect some got sick, recovered, and now have natural immunity. Others have seen the damage incurred by the vaccines. Any doctor who led a team will have exercised leadership and supported all members of their team. Doctors with real experience on the COVID front line would be expected to support personal choice when it comes to COVID vaccination.

    The floaters who are the rear echelon motherf*ckers will jump in front of the media and speak for everyone.

    Saskatchewan Health is prepping their “narrative” regarding their role in the “expected” upcoming Antibody Dependent Enhancement crisis. They want to blame the families for the loss of their elders. They don’t want the bureaucracy’s treatment protocols questioned. That is “verboten”.

    Saskatchewan is the home of medicare. They don’t want to be seen as the f*ckups who did not deal with the Antibody Dependent Enhancement crisis. That would wipe out medicare. It is better to blame the family’s little ones for the deaths of their grand parents.

    If, as an unvaccinated subhuman, I followed a treatment plan that was superior to the provincial medicare plan/protocol… why have medicare?

  15. There is evidence that there is a two week or so window of immunity suppression as the body deals with the vaccination. If you were to put those in the 14 or 21 day window in the vaxed category, the efficacy of the vaccines would drop significantly. Can’t have that!

  16. bill gates and the chicoms are laughing their asses off at us…… they are going to kill a lot of sheeple

Navigation