A study recently published in the Lancet Healthy Longevity sought to estimate the extent to which drug trials underestimate side effects. It was funded by the UK Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. The study chose as its particular focus people being treated for high blood pressure with a certain class of blood pressure lowering drugs known as RAAS blockers (which includes all drugs with names ending in -pril and all drugs with names ending in -sartan). The advantage with looking at this particular class of drugs is that there are a ton of trials. Every major pharmaceutical company has its own RAAS-blocker. It should therefore be possible to draw relatively broad conclusions about the results – whatever they show, they apply to the entire pharmaceutical industry, not just to a few specific companies. It’s also reasonable to think that the results apply to other classes of drugs too – there’s no reason to think trials of RAAS-blockers have been done differently than trials of other drug classes.
What the study sought to do more specifically was compare the rate of serious adverse events in clinical trials of RAAS-blockers with the rate observed in the real world. A serious adverse event is any event that is potentially life threatening or that results in death, hospitalization or lasting disability. If a trial has been designed in such a way that it is representative of reality, then the rate of serious adverse events in the trial should largely mirror that seen in the real world.
110 trials of RAAS-blockers were identified by the researchers. Of these, 11 were specifically designed to look at older people (i.e. didn’t recruit anyone under the age of 60). The data on serious adverse events from these 110 trials was extracted and compared to real world data on deaths and hospitalizations taken from a UK government funded database of 55,000 people living in Wales, who were being treated with RAAS-blockers. Deaths and hospitalizations are not exactly the same thing as serious adverse events (which as mentioned above also include “life threatening events”, and could for example include someone who is treated in an emergency department after a fall but not admitted to the hospital), but they’re close enough to allow a reasonable comparison.
So, what were the results?
So, what were the results?
Here’s one:
https://rumble.com/vk23ha-patient-asserts-sudden-neurological-disorder-caused-by-covid-vaccine.html
And it attacks your heart.
The vaccination that is.
Our politicians blindly jumped in this globalists narrative.
And once they did, they are committed to the bitter end…
They’re NEVER wrong as we have seen.
And you can add this report to the mix:
DIRE WARNING FROM DR. CHARLES HOFFE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/A6GbcUl6blpJ/
D-Dimer test shows 62% of “vaccine” recipients show positive for micro clots…
Oh joy, what could possibly go wrong with heart damage and clots?
And the best part is you can’t sue because you’ve given Big Pharma an “unconditional waiver of liability”; as you are participating in a medical experiment.
Cheers
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
“…D-Dimer test shows 62% of “vaccine” recipients show positive for micro clots…”
No. D-Dimer is an exclusionary test. Low D-Dimer excludes thrombosis but a high result doesn’t really say anything.
Here’s the suit being filed in Alabama seeking an injunction against the clot shots. The whistle-blower testimony is on page 41.
https://magainstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction-file-stamped.pdf
Here’s a personal anecdote. I don’t take prescription medication….at all…never. As a result, my natural immunity is through the roof. My last cold? (about 20 years ago…probably longer). My last flu (never had it) or if I did, the symptoms were so muted that I didn’t notice. Allegies? (none)
My point is this: I am a strong believer that medications have their place. But, should be used VERY sparingly. Unfortunately, they are used far too often, and in scenarios for which they are not necessary. As a result, you have a majority of people running around who are very prone to just about every form of bacteria or virus. Their bodies have negated the proper ability to manufacture interferons. Further, they have compromised their body’s ability to manufacture natural antibodies. These are the people who show symptoms of Covid 19…while those of use who have strong natural immunity probably were exposed to Covid, but never showed symptoms and won’t on any of these new variants.
It annoys me that as a result of a vast majority of the population abusing prescription medication, those of us who are not at risk to any of these diseases have to wear masks and social distance as well, to accommodate other people’s haphazard compromising of their natural immunity over the decades past.
You’ll not convince me that I’m wrong about this.
I can instantly stop the 4th wave coming…
Stop testing you assholes!
Your using the flu virus as cover for covid.
Funny how we have a couple seasons of no flu being recorded.
They rarely tested for flu. If you had the symptoms they assumed you had the flu. If you were asymptomatic you had nothing. How times change. But they still don’t test for flu.
Back in the day when we grew up swimming in the East River infant mortality was a lot higher than it is today, but if you managed to make it to 12 you were one immunologically tough little son of a bitch.
George Carlin was right.
Nice!
What aboot f’n Indians swimming in the Ganges…?!
They swim in worse on the streets … daily.
Orson
I wouldn’t even try. I’m with you on that big time.
An Immune system needs AMMUNITION….DAILY…!! Its what We did as kids do, playing out in the Dirt & bushes, jumping into pond n ditches to catch frog and such. What this pandemic has done is literally and in a VERY big way, WEAKEN the entirity of the Western Hemisphere Population:
Social distancing – utter totally ineffective BS
MAsk Wearing more utterly ineffective BS
and the mania for SANITIZING every Goddamned surface on the planet has simply added to the fact that for the past 17 months we’ve killed off a lot of Bacterial – Viral agents alright and at the same time most likely Severely degraded our collective immune systems.
I have not used sanitizer EVER (other than forced to in a medical facility), I don’t give a shit about social distancing…I like to hug and shake hands and all that stuff. And mask wearing is to me like building a chain link fence to prevent ingress of mosquitos. ASSININE. I do take Vitamin D daily as I have for decades…along with Vit C w/Zinc. Thats it..!!
One wonders how/if the measures affected the inoculated differently…??
+++ steakman
A few comments:
First, it isn’t really reasonable to compare the COVID-19 vaccine testing with the normal testing regime. The COVID-19 vaccines were all developed and tested many times faster than normal. That was seen to be acceptable faced with what was, according to the experts and models a vicious disease with a very high mortality rate. Just because reality has turned out to be different you can’t really blame governments and drug companies for trying to avert what was believed at the time to be a catastrophe.
My second comment is based upon some very old experience working for a multi-national pharmaceutical company in France. As with most drug companies, they were more concerned with passing FDA acceptance than anything else. Not that the FDA required more rigorous testing, but it did require strict adherence to its methodologies (whether correct or not) and copious amounts of paperwork.
One day, a research pharmacologist came to my office (I was working on computing systems there) to ask if I could write a data editor to modify his test data. I (of course) asked why. He replied that when he plotted the graphs, instead of the expected smooth curve he had a smooth curve with a kink in it. I suggested that the correct thing to do was to run more tests. The added data would either smooth out the kink, or make it more pronounced. If more pronounced, then more investigation would be required to find out what was going on. He wasn’t happy. I have no doubt that he asked someone else to write his data editor.
Another time, I walked in on a lab tech performing an experiment. She was sitting there hitting a bell-jar with a ruler. The drug she was testing was intended to increase the brain’s resistance to lack of oxygen by making the arteries more elastic. The test methodology was to take batches of mice. One batch had the drug, the other didn’t. Mice were placed under the bell jar, and air pumped out. She was timing how long it was until the last mouse stopped twitching. Banging the bell jar was supposed to encourage them to twitch.
I mentioned that it was probably better to flush the bell jar out with nitrogen (or some inert gas) than pump out the air, because they were actually testing how well the mice reacted to decompression rather than oxygen loss. She called the researcher over and asked him. He said it made sense to him, but the test was specified by the FDA, so they didn’t have a choice.
I then suggested that if they wanted to test improved elasticity of the arteries, an even better test might be simply to throw the mice against the wall, and measure how far back they bounced. It took him a few seconds to realize what I was doing, and stop thinking about the idea…
I enjoyed that comment – thank you
Phil
Sorry & Respectfully, but this is not correct:
“..The COVID-19 vaccines were all developed and tested many times faster than normal…”
The First Corona Virus Vaccine was developed and Patented in 2000. And yes, it contained the Ace Receptor, the S Spike protein and the Ace2 Domain. Jan 28, 2000.
US Patent 6372224
They’ve had 22 years to get it right….just as they’ve had 22 years to perfect their BIO-WEAPON(s) SARS + CovSARS2 – Also patented.
Suggest you have a listen to this….it is EYE POPPING incredible..!!
https://catherineedwards.life/aiovg_videos/a-manufactured-illusion-dr-david-martin-with-reiner-fuellmich-9-7-21/
The Lancet. I have heard of that somewhere, haven’t I???
1) Oh, that’s right, the publication that ran a story 18 months ago saying the CCP/PLA Virus couldn’t possibly come from a Lab. That Lancet?
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30418-9/fulltext
2) Oh, that’s right, the publication that published a study that Hydroxychloroquine didn’t work and the retracted it after it was found to be bullshit. That Lancet?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/22/the-lancet-reforms-editorial-policy-after-hydroxychloroquine-covid-study-retraction
3) Oh, that’s right, the publication whose editor a few years ago said that 50% of his peer reviewed published studies couldn’t be duplicated and that they have been publishing total bullshit. That Lancet?
I smell a dead rat.
John
MY thoughts EXACTLY. Lancet alongside the New England Journal of Medicine and damned near Any other publication on the planet that ALL used to be reputable publications and provided believable and trustworthy material.
Now….?? i don’t believe anything I see from supposed big “scientific” orgs, big harma, govt, msm and sure as shit not from big tech. The deep state.
ALL Co-opted and its always “follow the money”
I caused a massive NPC BSOD in the wife of a friend a couple of weeks back with the Lancet. He was handwringing about keeping his ten year old away from everyone until he could be vaccinated, and I pointed out his kid was at zero risk of COVID anyway.
His wife, a supercilious schoolteacher (but I repeat myself) asked me if I had any proof of that and to “show my work”. After pointing out that it’s not possible to prove a negative and that the burden of proof lies with those claiming risk to show their work, I referenced the recent Lancet article confirming that children are more at risk from childhood influenza than COVID.
She promptly BSODed. They know there’s ample evidence out there that the Lancet is garbage, but if they dismiss the Lancet out of hand they have to admit that major medical journals aren’t reliable – which opens them up for all kinds of wrongthink about HCQ, Ivermectin, vaccines and asymptomatic transmission.
I figure that half of what we are told, by any organization, is false and half is true. It is my job to figure out which is which.
The Pfizer FDA filing for its jab reported that no test subject died, either on the vaccine side or the placebo side. I’d say that is an example of Rushworth’s point.
Probably cause they never ever did test on HUMANS…..thats occuring as we speak..!!
The Animal tests that were reported to have been carried out (all 4 of them), proved to be a colossal Failure – ALL the Animals in All 4 trials DIED.
Musta been the weather….
I’ve been munching a “-sartan” BP medication for about six years.
Interestingly, I have not had a decent sniffle for at least four years.
I do, however, eat a fair amount of citrus fruit and take a zinc supplement (Australian soils are notoriously low in zinc).
Other than that, I try to stay reasonably fit. Mountain-biking is my idea of “low-impact” exercise, being a bit old and broken to keep trying for my Tae Kwon Do black belt.
The ENTIRE “medical fraternity” can expect some serious “blowback” to gradually develop over the next year or so, and, in my experience, this will be WAY overdue.
Related,
Ever heard about those plant based burgers called “impossible burger”?
they look and even bleed like real beef, and taste relatively good.
well turns out they contain a lot of NEW GMOs ( genetically modified organisms) and a lot of new weird things that were only tested on rats for 28 days.
yes 28 days.
no one knows what the side effects are if you eat those for years
yet those burgers are sold everywhere
CF, Isn’t the “Impossible Burger” the product owned and promoted by Bill Gates? That right there, is a giant RED flag for me! Doesn’t really matter, because there is no way I will ever eat that lab created chemical crap, even if I was reduced to eating rice, flavored with HP sauce, or just plain boiled rice.
Unfortunately, that food dystopia might actually end up as reality, with the direction the elites are shoving/forcing us toward. I would also bet that those same elite will never eat those impossible fake meats, and will continue to fly around the planet in their private jets. You see, these rules are made up by them for us, not for themselves. They plan to take this planet and it’s remaining inhabitants (after population reduction protocols are completed) back to a feudal system with a modern technical twist. Those that survive will own nothing and be happy, they will insist on that. The first to go, will be the educated western populations as we, being educated and more aware, will also be a threat to their power base, whereas, those from less educated third world nations will be more compliant and more accepting of that feudal new world order, and in most cases, the changes will be an upgrade from the lives they have now, so they will be a perfect new peasantry.