Weblog Awards
Best Canadian Blog
2004 - 2007
Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage
email Kate
(goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
I am not a registered charity. I cannot issue tax receipts.
Support Our Advertisers
Want lies?
Hire a regular consultant.
Want truth?
Hire an asshole.
The Pence Principle
Poor Richard's Retirement
Pilgrim's Progress
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
Posted this on another site but thought I’d throw it in here for comments.
Just something to think about and cast out for anyone that has any expertise on this idea. Suppose the impeachment charade goes ahead. Isn’t it up to the House to prove the charge that they have leveled against him to the Senate before the Senate can make a decision. If the charge can’t be proven then isn’t it a possibility that Trump could sue all Congress members both Democrat and Republican for defamation of character and as such demand reparations. Such reparations could virtually wipe out the upper echelons of the Democratic party. Just a thought. This might bring some sobriety back into politics in America.
One house member ask if any of the arrested had been interviewed for fact finding puppies. A very revealing 45 seconds of silence followed.
My 45 seconds are up.
I’d imagine that in Congress, just as in Canada’s House of Commons, freedom of speech is absolute, that is no one can be sued for slander (although there are rules of decorum enforced by the Speaker). In effect, legislative proceedings are not bound by tort law (questions of constitutionality are a different matter).
Now, making a statement that is known to be false for the purpose of damaging someone’s reputation is defamation. Hillary, the DNC, Steele, and a host of others with their whole Russia Collusion hoax, could soon find themselves the targets of a sizable suit.
Finding a judge is unlikely antenor
I would think that finding a judge would not be a problem, finding an honest judge is the problem! Now as of sometime next week when Trump returns to Florida, I think there could be a good possibility that there may be a judge or two in that state that might, just might have parents that survived the Castro regime. Something to think about.
Why is anyone surprised?
“The first step in community organization is community disorganization. The disruption of the present organization is the first step toward community organization. Present arrangements must be disorganized if they are to be displace by new patterns…. All change means disorganization of the old and organization of the new.” ~ Saul Alinsky
You got to tear it all down, if you want something new there.
You got to tear it all down, if you want something new there.
And build back better.