The Democrats’ Contempt for the American People

12 Replies to “The Democrats’ Contempt for the American People”

1. Posted this on another site but thought I’d throw it in here for comments.
   Just something to think about and cast out for anyone that has any expertise on this idea. Suppose the impeachment charade goes ahead. Isn’t it up to the House to prove the charge that they have leveled against him to the Senate before the Senate can make a decision. If the charge can’t be proven then isn’t it a possibility that Trump could sue all Congress members both Democrat and Republican for defamation of character and as such demand reparations. Such reparations could virtually wipe out the upper echelons of the Democratic party. Just a thought. This might bring some sobriety back into politics in America.

   1. One house member ask if any of the arrested had been interviewed for fact finding puppies. A very revealing 45 seconds of silence followed.

      1. My 45 seconds are up.

   2. I’d imagine that in Congress, just as in Canada’s House of Commons, freedom of speech is absolute, that is no one can be sued for slander (although there are rules of decorum enforced by the Speaker). In effect, legislative proceedings are not bound by tort law (questions of constitutionality are a different matter).

      Now, making a statement that is known to be false for the purpose of damaging someone’s reputation is defamation. Hillary, the DNC, Steele, and a host of others with their whole Russia Collusion hoax, could soon find themselves the targets of a sizable suit.

2. Finding a judge is unlikely antenor

   1. I would think that finding a judge would not be a problem, finding an honest judge is the problem! Now as of sometime next week when Trump returns to Florida, I think there could be a good possibility that there may be a judge or two in that state that might, just might have parents that survived the Castro regime. Something to think about.

3. Why is anyone surprised?

   “The first step in community organization is community disorganization. The disruption of the present organization is the first step toward community organization. Present arrangements must be disorganized if they are to be displace by new patterns…. All change means disorganization of the old and organization of the new.” ~ Saul Alinsky

   You got to tear it all down, if you want something new there.

   1. You got to tear it all down, if you want something new there.

      And build back better.

4. They know we’re better people.

5. The tennats of the US constitution become irrelevant and replaced in a scoiety fixated on vitue signaling and the brown shirts of social media. The only uncertainty is what it gets replaced with.

6. Methinks that our American cousins are on the cusp of another revolution akin to the war of independence in which the 13 colonies threw off British rule.
   Only this time it will be the villagers throwing off the pillagers – AKA the deep state and the entrenched bureaucracy.
   Joe Six Pack & Mary Double-Wide are losing patience

7. I’ve posted this elsewhere:
   “President Donald Trump did not commit any impeachable offenses, but the House violated the Constitution to suggest he did and are, ironically, immune from reprisals, according to constitutional law expert Alan Dershowitz on Newsmax TV.”

   That is, the House members are immune from prosecution for what they say on the floor. By the way – Dershowitz is a Democrat – one of the only genuine ones left [ie, not a progressive, ‘woke’ Obama gang member].