The Scruton Tapes

Anatomy of a modern hit job;

Sometimes a scandal is not just a scandal, but a biopsy of a society. So it is with the assault on Sir Roger Scruton, who in recent weeks has been smeared in the media, fired by the government and had his life’s work assailed. Scruton is the latest, though far from the first victim of the modern outrage mob. […]
 
The hit job on Sir Roger can be seen as a classic of the genre: he was sacked within five hours of the Twitter storm breaking. His fate offers a perfect case study in the art of modern character assassination. Except that in this instance, it unravelled and the whole nature of the trick can now be exposed. It is worth examining in some detail.

30 Replies to “The Scruton Tapes”

  1. There are stages the totalitarians, closet dictators, socialists, fascists and communists and other such ‘ists use to shut people up.

    The first stage is a verbal attack on what they said or did.
    If you read the production of mass media cartel, you read it every day.

    The second stage is where they force the victims to lose their living.
    (Happened to my father, from chief economist of the ministry of forests and agriculture to one that collects dead animal from collective farms. Heh, they apologized after some 15 years when their own existence was tentative and gave him back a decent job.)

    The third stage is prison.
    Check with Solzhenitsyn.

    The fourth stage is execution.
    This mostly happens to the higher up, nobody cares what the guy that gives out toilet paper at a public toilet says.

    1. Exactly. Cultural Marxism and its form of nihilism seeks to destroy all opposition one way or another.

      This sort of attack is only going to get worse until our society as we know it is destroyed. That is their ultimate aim, and we see it escalating every day now.

      Note the media reports of Trudeau attacking Scheer and Kenney as white nationalists.

      1. It remains to be seen if Scheer rolls over and plays dead.
        So far it would appear that Kenney will fight it.

      2. They damn well better be white nationalists. We don’t want them in control of anything if they are not Canadian nationalists first and foremost. If they were black nationalists would that be OK?

  2. When men started to go along with pussification is when this really began. Bring back dueling, and bare knuckle and skull fist fights. Even if they have no honor, never forget your own. Get off the soy.
    And stand up for the truth publicly. Because they believe they have everyone cowered, that you had better damn well shut the hell up and submit.

    1. There are no Conservative Men.

      Point out one. Just one.

      Trump isn’t much of a Conservative, but more Man, more backbone and more Conservative accomplishments than any other so-called Conservative these days.

      The British are cowards. Soon to be deservedly vanquished.

      Just like their prone descendants, the Canubes.

      Men.

      Ancient history in these parts.

      More testicles in a nunnery.

        1. Firstly, I should rephrase.

          There no Conservatives in Canada that are Men. Real Men.

          Real men would not have allowed the dystopian future that awaits Canada. Your children and grandchildren.

          I’ve watched as Canadians gave up without a fight. With nary a peep.

          I fought until my opinion of the hoi polloi reached the intellectual depths of the current non-occupant of 24 Sussex.

          Luckily, I have found Black Russians to be a great temper to my disgust for my fellow Canadians.

          Note to CBC:

          Black Russians are a alcoholic drink and have nothing to do with Andrew Scheer colluding with Russians, which I understand is the CBC and their Liberal Partys’ fallback plan if they can’t make Andy The Nazi Dandy stick.

          Kill the CBC!

          1. “Real men would not have allowed the dystopian future that awaits Canada.” I would suggest that we have tried but have been vastly outnumbered by the free lunch crowd and the complicit media.

      1. If your defining conservatives in only political terms your right, there are non because you can’t get elected.

        Trump never held himself out as a conservative. He was always a NY liberal. He now seems to be more conservative but I would think that is more related to his age. He’s seen it all. Heard all the bullshit and has no aspiration to a political career so he calls it as he sees it. Nothing more dangerous than an old guy with nothing to lose.

        I know lots of conservative men and women – you probably do to. They may not be conservatives in the political sense but they’ve got a set and when push comes to shove they’ve got your back.

        1. “when push comes to shove they’ve got your back.”

          That would be you, abtrapperdude.

          From what we’ve all read here, you’ve proven yourself to be that stand-up kind of fellow. When something wasn’t just quite right, you have taken the correct side of a
          point-counterpoint.

          Kudos to you.

          1. Thank you NR. There are people on this blog who are stand up types and that includes you.

            nbguy:

            Don’t expect politicians to live up to your standards. That’s what your friends do.

            Politicians aren’t there to cover your back, they are in it for themselves….and all this left/right stuff is crap that keeps the proles agitated.

            I agree with your list of grievances – you could include a lot more.

            It’s not politics that is wrong in Canada. It’s us. Our philosophy is upside down. If we changed, our politics would reflect it.

        2. Sorry. Disagree completely.

          There is not an honest politician in Canada. Not one.

          Our party system does not allow it.

          And Conservatives have never had anyones back. In power they govern just like Liberals. Which is why we are where we are.

          Which is why no politician ever mentions our Rationed Health Care System.

          Or our Prime Ministers’ and Finance Ministers’ Trust Funds for the rich.

          Or our co-opted Liberal Legal System.

          Or non – bilingual bilingual Canada.

          Or our Corporatism/Fascism style of Government.

          Or our embarrassing Canadian Media.

          Ecetera ad nauseam.

          Name one person who has or will address any of this?

          To say nothing of the Greatest Financial Fleecing of Regular People in Canadian History which occurred over the last 30 years.

          No push back in Canada. None, nada, none whatsoever.

          Present day Canadians are a whipped, defeated people sans backbone.

          It aint purty but it’s true.

          Pity.

        3. I agree, but mostly voices crying in the wilderness.

          I guess the people will have to find out for themselves, except then it is too late.

      2. I am the only living conservative in Canada and I define conservatism. I am the definition.

  3. Sadly today, the “out of context” defence has been somewhat neutralized by lefties who use it to insist that they didn’t say something which they clearly did say, and without exculpatory contextual qualifiers fore or aft.

    “Out of context” for many, then, has become as laughable as “spend more time with my family”.

    That said, Sir Roger needs, not self-censorship, but to be more street smart; to be careful about the use of words like ‘tribes’and ‘invasions’. He needs to realize what the purpose of a liberal interviewer will be and to speak accordingly and not provide easy fodder for the assasins. Oh, and not talk about jooos in the collective sense.

    Better yet, study the background of the interviewer and usually just not do the interview.

    1. excellent post on how to Dhimmify your self. People who are street smart use all the words and phrases you suggest they should not use, and that is why Trump is hated so much. He uses those very words ad phrases.

  4. Conrad Blacks’s counter to a white supremacist piece by Neil McDonald (CBC) is in the National Post today and somewhat relevant to this discussion, He argues correctly that the white supremicist slurs being thrown around by media, including by the CBC, are without merit. Now they are trying to paint Scheer with the same white supremicist brush as they have used on Trump. Garbage and more garbage.

    1. These days anyone not falling in line with the radical left’s nihilistic ideology is called a white nationalist or even worse a white supremacist. According to them western society needs to be destroyed and replaced by an unattainable imaginary utopia that does not exist.

      See the Greco-Roman collapse.

  5. You cannot fight the Twitter mob, by joining the Twitter mob.

    You cannot fight a carbon tax, by going along with a carbon tax.

    You cannot change Ottawa, by supporting Ottawa insiders.

    You cannot win, by falling into all their Kafka traps, and following all their rules.

    1. Fight?

      Canadian Conservatives don’t fight.

      They run and hide.

      Pathetic, pusillanimous Liberal doppelgangers at best.

      Shame on Canadian Conservatives for being so soft.

  6. Rule number one: do not apologize, ever. Rule number two: ignore the polls and the statements published in the media; they’re just the left-wing spin. Rule number three: do not hide; maintain as high a profile as possible. Rule number four: hit back just as hard if not harder; if law suits are feasible then by all means sue. Rule number five: stick up for the real victims of the “progressive” BS, invariably the weakest and most vulnerable in our society. You’ll be amazed at the number of people who will quietly support you, most importantly when it comes to the only poll that counts, i.e. an election.

    1. Yes, rule no. 1 is absolutely essential.

      Just say: what I said is not subject to interpretation by anyone and “journalists “ in specific.

  7. I’ve been reading Roger Scruton for years. I might suggest a book of short stories called, Gentle Regrets. He is an excellent thoughtful writer. A good break from politics…

  8. Why is it, the moribund mainstream media, resort to slanderous hit pieces to briefly boost readership?

    Because they are moribund. They are dinosaurs of their own inability to adapt to digital freedom of speech.

    Easily exposed for how unreliable and dishonest so many of them have become, only hastens their demise.

    “They are hoist with their own petard.” as Shakespeare would write.

    The MSM have become suicide bombers of their own business model and then lament their shrinking numbers!

  9. Eaton should have been straight-up fired for what he did, not just forced to delete and apologise for an Instagram post. He acted deliberately to mischaracterise everything about that interview and achieved the outcome he desired, thus opening both himself and his employer up to huge liability. Plus, he seems like a self-important dick.

  10. So, I may have missed it, but did Scruton get his position back? The article does not seem to say.

Navigation