Shiny Pony

International arms dealer.

After the Liberals came into power in 2015, then foreign affairs minister Stephane Dion signed off on export permits to approve the shipment of the LAVs based on an assessment that the Saudis would not use the armored vehicles against civilians but to defend Saudi Arabia from attacks from terror groups such as the Islamic State.

22 Replies to “Shiny Pony”

  1. Saudi Arabia’s own citizens are probably trying to overthrow the government. This tends to be what happens when you do. I don’t personally care whether the Saudi government is overthrown or not, and recent history would indicate that as bad as the government is, whoever overthrows them will likely be worse. So in the end I don’t care. The more of them kill each other, the fewer will be trying to kill us. If a few Canadians can put food on the table, and a bunch of Arabs kill each other I’m having a hard time finding a down side.

  2. I would rather they gave us $15 billion that giving it to the Chinese. So what if they kill each other. What has that got to do with us?

  3. rational thought is lacking in Canada. the captcha sums it all up(sulzbach toilettes)

  4. The height of insanity is going to the Canadian Open Golf tournament, having to line up for security which is constantly being escalated as muslims attacks increase daily. This “security” is being done by muslims with the females in hijabs so they support sharia law in my view. What could go wrong?

  5. Terradyne has only been around since 2011,one of their former directors was also on Magna’s Board, but it’s hard to find out who and how connected they are. Googled Terradyne Board and got nothing.
    Their site profile says they have 50 employees and do $25 million per year in sales. This is a vast difference between a 15 billion dollar sale to Saudi Arabia. Their armored vehicles have been sold to several police forces in Canada,including Winnipeg,just in case,I suppose. Bruce Power has also purchased the Gurkha 2 AV from Terradyne.
    Perhaps someone here who is a lot better at internet research can find out the connections to the Canadian establishment,which are most assuredly there. I’d hypothesize that someone in the upper echelons of the Canadian business elite is a partner or owner of this company,and they are adept at bribing both major political Parties.
    Of course,the comments at the link blame it all on………….HARPER! Bet ya never would a guessed.

  6. This is why I bought shares in Power Corporation when Trudeau became PM. If you are going to have a country with third world levels of corruption, you’d might as well profit from it.

  7. Indeed. There is nothing wrong with being an international arms dealer. This post smacks of quasi-pacifistic nonsense.

  8. The Saudi’s didn’t break their word:
    -they had their fingers crossed
    -your promise to an infidal doesn’t count
    -if you don’t support the regime then you’re not considered a citizen
    -they’re no longer called LAV’s in Saudi Arabia they’re called Armed Taxi Cabs
    Take your pick of an excuse….or maybe all of them.

  9. I believe that Canada should sell heavy armaments to both Brand-X Islam and Brand-Y Muslim. Sell weapons to both the House of Sauud… and the house of Khomeini. Let the half the Muslims kill the other half … then our cleanup job gets 100% easier. Good job Canada! Good return on your conflict-oil dollars.

  10. Is Canada the only country on earth that builds and sells LAVs?
    As for using them against Saudi insurgents, what types of vehicles were the Canadian Forces driving during the October Crisis of 1970?? How about the confrontations at Oka?
    No further questions.
    Re: Oka: There’s a clear picture of an LAV at 1:00
    https://youtu.be/61ldZTjlfgE

  11. What kind of country sells light armoured vehicles to another country, and then claims to “monitor” their use?
    I mean really?
    What planet are they on?
    As far as the cancellation penalties, when is that the seller’s problem???
    The Liberals are the suckas for cancellation penalties, a helicopter deal comes to mind…

  12. They didn’t exist at the time of the FLQ crisis, but they were certainly used at Oka.

  13. The liberals were not too concerned that one of their citizens was making bombs and IED s that were used to kill and maim our allies, and probably even some Canadian Military personnel. What do these morons use for brains?

  14. Even worse. Blazing Cat Fur linked to a Glib & Pale article about the sale that used “weaponized equipment” and “combat machines” because “armoured vehicles” doesn’t sound menacing enough. Although at least they didn’t use “tanks” which is the standard MSM appellation.

  15. I had a friend who was an Army Vet who had served in Holland during WWII. The Canadian Army had a light armored personnel carrier that was used in the invasion. They were named a Ford T-16 Universal Carrier. Much like a LAV, they were equipped with a machine gun. My friend claimed that they rode in these small Ford V-8 powered tracked vehicles for about 100 miles, then they switched to ordinary Jeeps and other military trucks. He claimed that after the Germans had surrendered, the T-16 personnel carriers were scrapped.
    https://youtu.be/ADZ9MGw0v5w
    Another type of WWII LAV.
    https://youtu.be/_Oj5l_T4k2Q

  16. PS: Re. Tank in Quebec being used by Trudeau to control Canadian Citizens.
    Top LH corner is a tank on the streets of Quebec city, Oct. 1970.

  17. Is this how Canada is “back”? Being an arms dealer to Saudi Arabia?
    Imagine the moral superiority when the Right Honourable Hand Puppet lectures Trump on ANYTHING.
    Where is an avalanche when you need one?

Navigation