So let me see if I’ve got this right – a trans ‘man’ who thinks he’s a woman but who likes other women is a lesbian? Or is that a cislesbian?
We need the liberal party to adopt this kind of thing as official policy. “If you are only attracted to women with a pussy you’re a hater” is a real winner of a campaign slogan.
Actually that is a very sick person.
need I say a darn thing. need I point out just how stupid this is, need I?
I blame the reason all these crazy people are walking around in public to the insane decision by the Supreme Court of Canada that stated a person couldn’t be held in a mental hospital “against their will”.
So now you can ‘pray the not-gay away’?
I thought all that was fixed and immutable.
I remember a statement years ago concerning the United Church. It was something like, “The United Church allows homosexuality – next thing is they will make it compulsory.” I’m not all that concerned, they would prefer my children more. I have nothing to worry about.
Not at all “immutable” but practically “indisputable” in that you will not be permitted to dispute it.
Re: Comment from Scar – “The United Church allows homosexuality – next thing is they will make it compulsory.”
They did away with the pulpit some time ago – its now a fruit stand.
when is this going to reach the standup comedy circuit? or is that now hallowed ground for the ‘ists’?
So let me see if I’ve got this right – a trans ‘man’ who thinks he’s a woman but who likes other women is a lesbian? Or is that a cislesbian?
We need the liberal party to adopt this kind of thing as official policy. “If you are only attracted to women with a pussy you’re a hater” is a real winner of a campaign slogan.
Actually that is a very sick person.
need I say a darn thing. need I point out just how stupid this is, need I?
I blame the reason all these crazy people are walking around in public to the insane decision by the Supreme Court of Canada that stated a person couldn’t be held in a mental hospital “against their will”.
So now you can ‘pray the not-gay away’?
I thought all that was fixed and immutable.
I remember a statement years ago concerning the United Church. It was something like, “The United Church allows homosexuality – next thing is they will make it compulsory.” I’m not all that concerned, they would prefer my children more. I have nothing to worry about.
Not at all “immutable” but practically “indisputable” in that you will not be permitted to dispute it.
Re: Comment from Scar – “The United Church allows homosexuality – next thing is they will make it compulsory.”
They did away with the pulpit some time ago – its now a fruit stand.
when is this going to reach the standup comedy circuit? or is that now hallowed ground for the ‘ists’?