To insist, as Ms Fabello and Ms Khan do, that, “all men are at least passively complicit in this patriarchal system that rewards male entitlement,” that “maleness distorts the fabric of society,” and that “every time [men] ask for something, they’re going to get it,” is to air a conspiracy theory. And the insinuation that those of us who find feminism not entirely convincing are mere notches away from a man who “learns that if he commits rape, his friends will laugh it off,” might be insulting if it weren’t so bizarre.
Considering the website, and corresponding ideology, that those two are associated with, I’m not surprised. It’s like that old saying: if one has only a hammer, every problem becomes a nail.
Since one’s “gender identity” is now considered entirely separate from one’s sex at birth, surely feminism is effectively obsolete as an ideology?
All one needs do, is examine the statistics about ‘HATE’ crimes to find the origin of this malignant behavior. A substantial number of ‘HATE’ crimes are found to have been FAKED. Perpetrated by women, and men who feel the need to justify their victimhood. The fact is, that REAL hate crimes are statistically insignificant. This is intolerable to the ‘victim’-class! The FACT is … these professional ‘victims’ are not being ‘hated’ … they are being IGNORED. And there is nothing worse for drama-Queen, professional victims than being ignored. The general public apathy to their ‘plight’ has forced these ‘victims’ to desperately search for ‘perpetrators’. Hence, what could be better than labeling an ENTIRE GENDER as HATERS … just due to their very existence. The permanent ‘victims’ have found permanent ‘perpetrators. Men. One HALF of the planet is set upon them … albeit somewhat unwittingly. Yes, it really IS just like Firemen (oops … Firefighters) SETTING fires so they have jobs extinguishing them. These unhinged, unstable, perpetual victims are in serious need of psychological intervention (hat-tip, Hillary’s latest comment).
Passively complicit in a patriarchal system? All heterosexual sex is rape. The Y chromosome community needs to get over its misogyny and deal with this simple truism.
“every time [men] ask for something, they’re going to get it”
Spoken like someone who has no idea about the sex life of 80% of men.
Another example of nuclear level stupid. I contend that it is not a natural thing. This type of stupid must be learned through decades of sitting through progressive propaganda. (I do point a big middle finger at Academia).
All men have the potential for violence and must be broken. Therefore turning all men into pajama boys must lead to Utopia.
OK ladies. (calling them ladies feels wrong, it shows a respect they don’t deserve.)
Who you going to look to for protection when violent groups and ideologies that don’t share your worldview come banging on your door? You really think a gaggle of pajama boys is going to save your daughter from being raped, assaulted, or killed?
The feminazis will be begging God for the return of Mr. Beast as they, friends, family and neighbours are subjected to real violence.
Those prayers, if answered at all, will be answered by manly and necessarily violent MEN.
Say, that reminds me – what’s Lorena Bobbitt up to these days?
Probably still in a penile institution.
Quick: ask them if they think locker rooms are full of sexist talk…
There’s an awful lot of bronze plaques all of this country with only male names on them. I guess that proves Male Entitlement.
“Since one’s “gender identity” is now considered entirely separate from one’s sex at birth, surely feminism is effectively obsolete as an ideology?”
JJM, excellent point, surprised I haven’t seen it made before.
Ha, I think feminists(at least the straight ones) are just jealously pissed off because when anyone states the mantra “f*ck feminists”, they know we are strictly talking figuratively.
Excellent recall ! … and didn’t she change her story to self-defense ? That while sleeping … she KNEW her husband was dreaming of RAPE … so she ‘defended’ herself by severing all contact with her hubby.
Maybe the feminists would like to comment on the following. With all the self-righteous cries about “locker room talk, if the following pans out, someone has some explaining to do.
“No wonder Bill Clinton campaigned for work release for convicts between February 1976 and April 1976 when he ran for the Attorney General primary, at the same time the rapist was on a work release, according to the Clinton House Museum in Arkansas. The child fondler was convicted on November 4 1975 and initially sentenced to ten months.
To summarize, Hillary Clinton’s rapist client was “released to work in day” after being convicted of child fondling and did not spend the 10 months he was sentenced to fully in jail. His work was a 5 minute walk from his victim. Indeed, in Hillary’s own words, “I got him off with time served”. As well, the judge in this case was compromised as he instructed his son to donate to Bill Clinton’s campaign in 1974. The judge’s son signed the document that appears to appoint Clinton as the new lawyer for the client, lending the appearance that Clinton had a role in her appointment as attorney, thus contradicting her recent statements that she had nothing to do with it. Astonishingly, Bill Clinton campaigned for “work release” in his 1976 run for Attorney General, at the same time that the child fondler was “serving” his sentence by going to work. As well, according to the Washington Post, the judge Maupin Cummings directed his son Gordon Cummings to donate to Bill Clinton in the 1974 failed campaign for Congress, and Gordon did indeed donate and attend campaign events. Hillary was at these events with her future husband. The source for this is the Washington Post, only they must not have realized that Maupin Cummings was also a judge in this rape case.”
http://planet.infowars.com/politics/hillary-clinton-prevented-rapist-from-serving-jail-sentence-had-inside-man-in-case
The following person states that Taylor was appointed a public defender but “by some mechanism”, Taylor, instead, was served by Hillary as his attorney. There have been two different accounts, provided by Hillary, as to how she became his attorney. I can’t imagine why that is. Maybe Bubba can tell us why that is. /S
https://m.facebook.com/adrian.plessis.7/posts/10154012567555155