Rather than publicly report this departure from the accord, the Obama administration chose to quietly accept it. When a respected independent think tank, the Institute for Science and International Security, began pointing out the problem, the administration’s response was to rush to Iran’s defense — and heatedly attack the institute as well as a report in the New York Times.
This points to two dangers in the implementation of any longterm deal. One is “a U.S. willingness to legally reinterpret the deal when Iran cannot do what it said it would do, in order to justify that non-performance,” institute President David Albright and his colleague Andrea Stricker wrote. In other words, overlooking Iranian cheating is easier than confronting it.
This weakness is matched by a White House proclivity to respond to questions about Iran’s performance by attacking those who raise them. Mr. Albright, a physicist with a long record of providing non-partisan expert analysis of nuclear proliferation issues, said on the Foreign Policy Web site that he had been unfairly labeled as an adversary of the Iran deal and that campaign-style “war room” tactics are being used by the White House to fend off legitimate questions.
There is only one conclusion you can make about Obama based on his Iran deal. There is only one explanation starts with MOOSE ends with LIMB.
12 Times the Obama Administration Caved to Iran on Nuclear Deal | SUPERcuts! #211
Washington Free Beacon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBvIg_zRgiY
The whole ‘deal’ is an American surrender and would be more accurately titled:
“The Obama-Nation™ Goes to Munich”
Come hell or highwater the Obama-Nation™ is determined to pull off a Chamberlain. Naturally,
they can have all the hell they want; but I’m pretty sure they won’t enjoy it.
The Shadow of Munich Haunts the Iran Negotiations
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/416309/shadow-munich-haunts-iran-negotiations-victor-davis-hanson
Maybe the Obama-Nation™ should take up lessons in German…well so much for “Independence Day” celebrations.
European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility.
As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5-year phase-in plan that would become known as “Euro-English”.
In the first year, “s” will replace the soft “c”. Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy.
The hard “c” will be dropped in favour of “k”. This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter.
There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome “ph” will be replaced with “f”. This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter.
In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible.
Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling.
Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent “e” in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away.
By the 4th yer peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing “th” with “z” and “w” with “v”.
During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary “o” kan be dropd from vords kontaining “ou” and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reli sensibl riten styl.
Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.
Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze forst plas.
Cheers
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group ‘True North’
Just OK the deal already. I mean it’s not like you can’t afford to lose a couple or ten major cities in the future right?
We have last main problems never address
list of government of iran opposition:
solution of Iran government for any opposition was used to be jail or excution or exile leave country no voice allowed now list of opposition in Iran is too many and this is need concern for future of Iran security how to deal with opposition need new method to act with it.
IsIS who target shia are rank #1 enemy of Iran
for sure all knows israel are rank #2
Saudi and golf countries in support of wahabi #3
Mojahedeen of Khalg whoclaimed they are Muslim shia
http://rudaw.net/english/middleeast/iraq/230620152
called them MKO
by lead originally some one else then after his death was Masoud Rajavi in exile and now his wife Maryam Rajavi and Hillary clinton agreed they are no more involve terrorist activities story behind MKO is very controversial
rajavi lived in jail in shah time as his brother in human right save his life to live for ever life time jail rather than execute him by savak later in his releaase he was tried to be presdient of Iran that Khomeni not allowed him then he etner to debate of his islam vs khomeni Islam then Khomeni start arrest and kill couple of MKO group and rajavi start bombing sheikh terroris way one at a time killed 200 sheikh in Iran and khomeni arrest 10000 of more of them knowing their address like ship execut them with no trial with no proof they were involved in terrorist activities
then war in Iran and Iraq Rajavi stamp eggs with his logo and make his group more marketing business then scaped left with join with Iraqi caused they lost all credit among Iraninan then Iraqi get them out then they went some to US then some to France and some to albania this group still working in major opposition with Iranian government too
so in result government of Iran has lots of enemy inside among them and aboard need to deal with them. but how?
http://www.intifada-palestine.com/2015/01/mko-mossad-mortifying-ignominy-iran/
iran claiming their terrorist activities of mko and Isreal are similar but how to deal with country with too many enemy ready to kill them all is big risk for US too
list of Iranina who live outside of Iran link with shah group or Bahi Iranian or comonoist Iranian live in east Europe or Rusia who are oppose Iran government rank #5
plus numourous Iranian who live inside of Iran never got oppourtunity as majority vote or opposition that anybody allow hear their voice as last rank that need to have member of parment of them allow to Iran government
Hans, that was good.
Obama is only concerned about his legacy, his MB friends, and not about a deal that is good for the security of Israel and the west in general.
I need a translation for rest of comments other than the two @ 5:25 and 7:51.
BOMB,BOMB,BOMB IRAN,LET US NUKE TEHRAN
// When a respected independent think tank, the Institute for Science and International Security, began pointing out the problem …//
Oh THAT ISIS..
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/albright_david
// In recent years, Albright has collaborated on numerous occasions with individuals and organizations that are closely associated with neoconservatism, a rightist ideological faction in the United States that has long promoted U.S. military intervention in the Middle East, most notably in Iran and Iraq.
Neoconservative outlets like the Wall Street Journal editorial page and other elements of the right-wing “pro-Israel” community have also been quick to cite Albright’s work in support of their hawkish agenda. //
Just so.
Everyone is going to be so surprised when Iran has the bomb in a few years. Then in quick succession Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt will have them bomb. Doesn’t that make everyone feel safe? Maybe Obama should get another peace prize.
O-come on.
It’s NOT always the Jews.
Right you are.