New paper finds climate sensitivity to CO2 is only 0.43C, about 7 times less than the IPCC claims
7 Replies to “The Sound Of Settled Science”
The IPCC is mandated to find human causes of global warning ONLY, so they have to invent crap to hold on to their significance. This is comparable to finding causes of female rape other than male enforcement of power and control.
Yeah, their mandate is in their name. International Panel on Climate Change. It was set up with the understanding that there was a need to set it up and they have to keep underscoring the need for their continued existence.
No need. Dismantle it. Now.
Oz, it’s worse than that; it’s the INTERGOVERNMENTAL Panel on Climate Change.
The worst part is the Summary for Policymakers, which the media trumpets is totally at odds with the actual report, which the media ignores.
It’s even worse than that, it’s UNITED NATIONS intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Thank you for the correction, Shamrock.
“The short and long wavelength spectra show a pronounced saturation behavior with increasing water vapor and CO2 concentration and a strong mutual overlap. Both effects lead to a significant weakening of the greenhouse effect with increasing concentration.
The “greenhouse effect” is less and less as CO2 increases. Sounds like the guy that designed this system made it so that it would be relatively stable.
Yes, this planet was designed as a dynamic but inherently stable system. It’s maintained that stability through variations in climate far more extreme than anything humans can possibly cause.
The IPCC is mandated to find human causes of global warning ONLY, so they have to invent crap to hold on to their significance. This is comparable to finding causes of female rape other than male enforcement of power and control.
Yeah, their mandate is in their name. International Panel on Climate Change. It was set up with the understanding that there was a need to set it up and they have to keep underscoring the need for their continued existence.
No need. Dismantle it. Now.
Oz, it’s worse than that; it’s the INTERGOVERNMENTAL Panel on Climate Change.
The worst part is the Summary for Policymakers, which the media trumpets is totally at odds with the actual report, which the media ignores.
It’s even worse than that, it’s UNITED NATIONS intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Thank you for the correction, Shamrock.
“The short and long wavelength spectra show a pronounced saturation behavior with increasing water vapor and CO2 concentration and a strong mutual overlap. Both effects lead to a significant weakening of the greenhouse effect with increasing concentration.
The “greenhouse effect” is less and less as CO2 increases. Sounds like the guy that designed this system made it so that it would be relatively stable.
Yes, this planet was designed as a dynamic but inherently stable system. It’s maintained that stability through variations in climate far more extreme than anything humans can possibly cause.