8 Replies to “Winning Debates With Liberals”

  1. Yeah, well, Shapiro is for infringing on the 2nd Amendment. Just to a little lesser degree than the hard left. Not much to learn from him other than it’s a war of degrees. He’s there to warm the water around the frogs.
    If he really believed the 2nd Amendment exists for the purpose of resistance to tyrannical gov’t, he wouldn’t be against ownership of automatic weapons.

  2. Yes ‘chutzy’ Shapiro is a bright lad in identifying the tactical dispositions and biases of the ‘left-o-cracy’.
    As in every battle, you do yourself a great service by the careful study of enemy tactics and strategy.
    “I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy.”
    John Adams
    Cheers
    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group “True North”

  3. Just a couple of pointers that weakens his presentation:
    1. He didn’t do an interview with Piers Morgan, Morgan did an interview with him.
    2. The video didn’t go ‘viral’. To this date only about 733,942 views are showing on the main one, and smaller counts on the spin offs.
    Otherwise he’s good, but talks too fast, which again is a weakness in debating.

  4. Just a couple of pointers that weakens johnbrooks points:
    1. He did do an interview with Piers Morgan, and he clearly states in his presentation that he was invited onto Piers’ show.
    2. 733,942 views for a social policy issue debate is ‘viral’ by anybody’s standard. Maybe not the numbers you get in the brainless music video genre like Bieber or PSY. But impressive for a video between an aging Brit and a youthful political commentator.

  5. There was another video on Youtube of Shapiro’s appearance on Piers Morgan. It had well over 2 million hits before CNN ordered it taken down.

  6. Ok, I stand corrected on the count then.
    but his opening remark was he did an interview with Piers Morgan and the inclination was he was the host in the usage of the verb.

Navigation