Targeted: Latest Democratic Ad Has Gun Firing at GOP Opponent’s Head.
8 Replies to “The Tolerant Left”
Funny, I recall after Gabby Giffords they impugned Sarah Palin during the election used cross-hairs to focus on close races nearly calling her complicit in the shooting. Those Lib/Progs are so funny aren’t they. They actually give the word ‘HYPOCRITE’ a bad name. We should create a new word just for lib/progs duplicity. Any ideas?
Hey, could have been worse. They could have put crop marks that look like cross-hairs on it, like Palin did on her website.
Get over it. DemocRats are allowed to do -anything-. Republicans/Conservatives are allowed to shut the h3ll up and keep paying those taxes. Back to work, peons.
Good posit Dave. First we have to understand that most of these creatures who disguise themselves as progressives or populists or sundry other Lib-Left branded activists are essentially a collection of militant statists, regressive authoritarians, cultural nihilists and deindustrialization extremists. They want to usher in a modern form of global feudalism with the UN/IMF as the landlord and the population as serfs on their own land. If the Aboriginal community understood the true nature and goals of radical environmentalism is the ultimate “colonization” of the globe by authoritarian elites (who will make the conquistadors look like humanitarians), they would never support these green fascists.
As for the inherent hypocrisy of environmental radicals fighting for the environment by creating environmental disasters and killing innocent people – it’s really no different than the peaceniks who went bombing for peace, Multicultists who are racist to fight racism, or Maltusians who kill for life, or humanists who are inhuman for the benefit of humanity – it’s all doctrinal hypocrisy, a violation of their own ethic, self-deception, moral fraud, a denial of their raison d’etre. If you’re looking for a fast buzz phrase for this toxic hypocrisy, I’ve always referred to it as pretentious sanctimony – it’s as old as human foibles and it can be found concentrated in post modern relativist political ideals.
These are Freudian clues as to who you are really dealing with.
Militant socialist statism, militant fascist statism – little or no difference in their methodology.
Sooner or latter its all going to collapse.
Even the Soviet union could not continue even with a huge military.
Once you turn your population into serfs, there is nothing to lose.
Even terror means nothing when every individual becomes just a cipher to persecute. Jobs don’t exist because of fairy tale Dogma.
This is as old as mankind when Elites overreach to own everything. To pretend to be above the whole population.
The middle class has always been the wall between anarchy with political stability. Destroy it at your peril.
Slave States never last long. Can we say Zimbabwe or SA?
Notice that the rifle shown in the ad is a true fully automatic assault rifle, not the semi automatic variants legal for purchase throughout the US.
Of course it’s different when they do it. Their motives must always be seen as noble, even if Stalin tried them out first.
Funny, I recall after Gabby Giffords they impugned Sarah Palin during the election used cross-hairs to focus on close races nearly calling her complicit in the shooting. Those Lib/Progs are so funny aren’t they. They actually give the word ‘HYPOCRITE’ a bad name. We should create a new word just for lib/progs duplicity. Any ideas?
Hey, could have been worse. They could have put crop marks that look like cross-hairs on it, like Palin did on her website.
Get over it. DemocRats are allowed to do -anything-. Republicans/Conservatives are allowed to shut the h3ll up and keep paying those taxes. Back to work, peons.
Good posit Dave. First we have to understand that most of these creatures who disguise themselves as progressives or populists or sundry other Lib-Left branded activists are essentially a collection of militant statists, regressive authoritarians, cultural nihilists and deindustrialization extremists. They want to usher in a modern form of global feudalism with the UN/IMF as the landlord and the population as serfs on their own land. If the Aboriginal community understood the true nature and goals of radical environmentalism is the ultimate “colonization” of the globe by authoritarian elites (who will make the conquistadors look like humanitarians), they would never support these green fascists.
As for the inherent hypocrisy of environmental radicals fighting for the environment by creating environmental disasters and killing innocent people – it’s really no different than the peaceniks who went bombing for peace, Multicultists who are racist to fight racism, or Maltusians who kill for life, or humanists who are inhuman for the benefit of humanity – it’s all doctrinal hypocrisy, a violation of their own ethic, self-deception, moral fraud, a denial of their raison d’etre. If you’re looking for a fast buzz phrase for this toxic hypocrisy, I’ve always referred to it as pretentious sanctimony – it’s as old as human foibles and it can be found concentrated in post modern relativist political ideals.
These are Freudian clues as to who you are really dealing with.
Militant socialist statism, militant fascist statism – little or no difference in their methodology.
Sooner or latter its all going to collapse.
Even the Soviet union could not continue even with a huge military.
Once you turn your population into serfs, there is nothing to lose.
Even terror means nothing when every individual becomes just a cipher to persecute. Jobs don’t exist because of fairy tale Dogma.
This is as old as mankind when Elites overreach to own everything. To pretend to be above the whole population.
The middle class has always been the wall between anarchy with political stability. Destroy it at your peril.
Slave States never last long. Can we say Zimbabwe or SA?
Notice that the rifle shown in the ad is a true fully automatic assault rifle, not the semi automatic variants legal for purchase throughout the US.
Of course it’s different when they do it. Their motives must always be seen as noble, even if Stalin tried them out first.
Democrites