In light of the ongoing Benghazi Scandal, this BBC Radio documentary, first broadcast only recently, provides an “interesting” examination of Barack Obama’s “Lead from Behind” foreign policy. You can read the podcast summary here.
One of the most laughable moments is when one of his sycophants praises Obama for “seeing the world as it is“. Uh huh.
Bonus Podcast: You can learn about Romney’s “radical agenda” to … wait for it … balance the budget – that commentary from the “Math Is Hard” crowd of the mainstream media.
Never mind the BBC, this morning there was some bitch with a PhD on CBC radio cheerleading for Obama and saying that Romney stood a good chance of outlawing abortion. They just never stop.
Max, I find it eternally interesting to hear how foreign media covers North America. In more cases than not, foreign journalists don’t have a clue about the American mindset or spirit. But then neither does Obama.
Yes it’s nauseating. During Bronco Bamma’s 2008 coronation I happened to be sharing space with a bunch of eurofag academics. Anyway.. let’s just say I’m not shedding many tears over the EU economic situation now.
Thanks Robert
Not!
Rewarding the parasitic biased broadcasting corporation with web traffic is not doing anyone a favour. Especially objective reporting.
Wow so is this the election changing news Obama has been waiting to release
http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/islamic-regime-announces-suspension-of-uranium-enrichment/
If so I think/hope it is a little to late !!
DSV, if you refuse to listen to other points of view then it’s your loss. I posted the podcast think because:
1. I thought it was interesting for the most part.
2. Certain parts were indeed biased. Being able to identify that bias is one of my top political issues and I think important to other SDA’ers too.
Watch the price of gold if the choomer-in-chief gets back in.
Even if you own some…… who needs the grief?
Robert
This is where I think we are going to have to differ, I am always willing to listen to counter arguments, listen to dissenting views listen and read views from other perspectives and listen to the points of other ideologies.
That however is NOT the issue with the BBC.
The BBC is a parasite, it is funded by the taxpayer, there is no get out clause, even if you don’t own a television you still contribute through taxes as a UK taxpayer. As a taxpayer, as a citizen you have NO remit to the running and the direction of the BBC. Its tentacles spread into every part of what now passes as British culture from printed media, to the met office, to university curriculum (via the OU), to internet to local radio, it is more than an institution, it pervades the very fabric of life in the UK and it brazenly attempts to propagate its message, its ideology to the entire world, its not shy about its intentions, it does it in full glaring light of full disclosure.
That its views are biased is not in anyway in doubt, on a day to day basis perhaps you should look at Biased-BBC.com. Report after report after report finds it derelict in its duty to impartiality, and thats just the ones it deems fit to release, its own commissioned reports damn it, and it also gets and decides whether or not its going to release them.
So whether its worldwide promulgation of AGW by the infamous Roger Harribin or its Middle Eastern coverage, its anti semitic Israel coverage, its total cover up of muslim criminality, its cover up of behaviour of its own made celebrities, its blatant partisanship, its agendas in every aspect of its existence, this is the very very very worst type of propaganda and its continued in part by the narrative that it proves a balanced view. It supports this grandiosity in part by claiming its number of visits and viewership and requests for support from agencies around the world. The BBC continually states to parliament and public it needs an internet news service to balance the internet bias, and this is evidenced by the sheer volume of traffic it receives.
I therefore conclude, by linking to the BBC, you become a part of the problem NOT the solution.
The BBC is not the NYT or the Guardian, its not MSNBS or CNN it can’t be hurt by the withdrawal of patronage, it can only become hurt by becoming irrelevant.
Finally I appeal to your conservative values and ask that you re-consider your approach.