20 Replies to “Is There Nothing That Obama Can’t Do?”

  1. This just magnifies the inconvenient truth, that the lefties try to ignore. The US and Canada are still the best, ssfest, fairest place to live. The width of the the divide between our richest and poorest is irrelevant…if our poorest are much, much more affluent than anybody elses…
    Most of the word does not own a car, have adequate shelter, food a big screen TV and a micro-wave oven.
    The difference between the fortunes of our “occupy” and the protestors of Syria, Zimbabwe, Sudan and China is too often overlooked. The “occupy” had more to fear from each other…than the police/army.

  2. Bush, BamBam – different face-men for the same ruling cabal, same unconstitutional war making policy goes forward. What’s changed?
    Even the Tea Party realizes that this “we are the world’s policeman” BS is fiscally unsustainable and the crap justifying constant foreign military intervention is wearing thin.
    I go with RP on this, time to haul in the protracted military interventions for a decade and get back to running the economy and re-establishing a congress that works inside constitutional confines.

  3. The image reiterates what I’ve heard from several middle eastern taxi drivers over the past couple of years. The only concern they had with George Bush and the American military was that they didn’t keep going.

  4. Sasquatch>
    “The US and Canada are still the best, ssfest, fairest place to live”
    For now, the left has been working double shifts to change that little convenience for us. Mass Third World immigration from the Islamic world, criminal Africa, East Indies & Asia have flooded our streets with future anarchy.
    Our welfare and healthcare sustainability are being sucked up by illegal immigrants, and non participating aged parent immigrants, India especially has made an industry of it. Fairness is what the CHRC decides.

  5. Looks like another invitation to crusade for the freedom fighters of Islam. Meh, just go do whatever it is you Muslims do. Allah will bless the winner. Tell him I said hi when you see him.

  6. Most if not all African and ME nations formerly under British colonial rule were better off than they are now. In the Case of India it worked out for the better. In Pakistan, it failed, confirming perhaps that Islamic wastelands are just that. No Western nation any longer has the resources, desire, or constitutional authority for decadal nation-building.

  7. John Chittick >
    “No Western nation any longer has the resources, desire, or constitutional authority for decadal nation-building.”
    That’s precisely why the “Progressive Liberal” Left has brought them to us, wholesale.

  8. Good man, Bush. Not tough enough to handle his political opponents, or too full of Christian forgiveness; but still a good man.
    The libels against him, and against Sarah Palin, I view as a stain on the US which they have yet to expatiate.
    I am of the idiosyncratic opinion that the US will not recover until the many who libelled Bush apologise for having done so.
    And to Sarah Palin also.

  9. jihadists prefer ‘bama who does nothing to speak out against the nastier side of islam…and if our courts continue their track record of late and acquit in the current honour killings trial, we’ll lose any right we have to speak out too…
    (The Australian) — At least 675 Pakistani women and girls were murdered during the first nine months of the year for allegedly defaming their family’s honour, a leading human rights group said today.
    The statistics highlight the scale of violence suffered by many women in conservative Muslim Pakistan, where they are frequently treated as second-class citizens and there is no law against domestic violence.
    Despite some progress on better protecting women’s rights, activists say the government needs to do far more to prosecute murderers in cases largely dismissed by police as private, family affairs.
    “A total of 675 women and girls were killed in the name of honour across Pakistan from January to September,” a senior official in the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan said.
    They included at least 71 victims under the age of 18.
    The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he is unauthorised to speak to the media, said figures were still being compiled for the period covering October to December, and that a full report would be released in February.

  10. Bemused >
    “Despite some progress on better protecting women’s rights, activists say…”
    If they truly wanted to protect women’s rights they wouldn’t be bringing the problem here.
    Close our borders and protect the rights of our grandchildren now.

  11. Obama is killing America with a thousand cuts.
    Between his Czars , regulatory bodies , deconstruction of Justice & its controlling appendages. The abuse of normal citizens even day to day by his own invented agencies. His obsession with class aligned with race warfare. Its breaking a Nation into pieces. That of course has been his plan all along. Nobody even the blind can’t see his evil design, but those who are willfully stupid. Those who we see the US die as its freedom bleeds away.

  12. Way to go Kate. You found the 10 or so non-Americans who prefer Bush over Obama (assuming this is real). Thanks for this damning condemnation.

  13. it takes a narcissistic socialist dictator with delusions of competence to know one…
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html
    Hugo Chávez blasted President Barack Obama as a “clown” and an “embarrassment” who has turned the United States into a “disaster” after Obama criticized Venezuela’s ties with Iran and Cuba, according to a report Tuesday.
    Chávez’s comments came in the wake of Obama’s Monday written interview with the Caracas paper El Universal, where the U.S. president questioned Venezuela’s connections to those countries. Chávez hit back strongly at Obama on state TV Monday, according to The Guardian, saying the president gave the interview only to “win votes” in the 2012 election……

  14. sorry, henry…
    more people would rather have Bush back than ‘bama for another term
    http://hotair.com/archives/2010/08/31/ohio-bush-50-obama-42/
    We’ll start rolling out our Ohio poll results tomorrow but there’s one finding on the poll that pretty much sums it up: by a 50-42 margin voters there say they’d rather have George W. Bush in the White House right now than Barack Obama.
    Independents hold that view by a 44-37 margin and there are more Democrats who would take Bush back (11%) than there are Republicans who think Obama’s preferable (3%.)

  15. I’m not buying it either. To a degree I think Ron Paul has it right. Unless there is a defined national security interest keep out. Iraq was working on WMD and Afganistan was training Taliban. The degree of the missions were questionable. Libya had no rationale and Syria less so. Arabs seem to be experts at shoving their women and kids to the front of the crowd for the photo ops.
    To the extent that Syria is an ally of Iran I can agree with the clandestine war there. Those fighting Assad are Sunnis, Saudi Arabia is Sunni, let them pay for it. Better yet let the Euros pay or fight, whatever, they’re the ones who buy the oil.
    Eventually the Americans will wise up and realize that energy self-sufficency is possible in N. America. They can write off the ME and leave for the Chinese to referee. Seriously, who cares?

  16. Seriously! Give the Israelis Greenland or Baffin Island and writeoff the ME. Almost guaranteed they will be growing oranges there within 5 years.

Navigation