Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Game on…
Ouseless’ latest numbers were 44% approval, so lets see how far he drops in his nonleadership roll in the bugget fiasco
speaking of the print media, things going from worse to horrible for rupe murderoch. that nuke sure dumped a lot of fallout….
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/apnewsbreak-rebekah-brooks-says-police-questions-answer-her-114130222.html
still waiting for input from the regulars on who you still support: the deceased armed forces personnel whose phones were hacked & families, or rupe who owns the exalted fox ‘news’ and KNEW what was going on (how could he build an organization that big without attention to detail).
still waiting …….
Rupert Murdoch is a business man first. I think he likes to play all sides and possibly got caught up in it all. With Fox being only a portion of the parent company I would think if he were right leaning he wouldn’t allow the flaming lefties he does on his network. No I think he might lean right but when it comes to his bread & butter he plays both sides.
bverwey
Boo flickin Hoo…Ya play the celebrity game ya takes yer chances.
“who you still support ?”
Oldschool
I notice you’ve asked this question in a couple other threads.
Sorry to disappoint oldschool but it’s the left with the cult of personality.
It’s “what” conservatives support, not “who”.
We like freedom and the small government required for freedom.
Remember when conservatives deep sixed their own party after Mulrooney. Do you remember the Liberals still voting for the dirty rotten to the core Liberal party after adscam? Did you notice how the Tea Party aren’t personally invested in George Bush and talk about his weaknesses?
IF Murdoch did something bad he should be punished – get it?
We’ll wait for the verdict from a court. We don’t trust the media witch hunt thingy; that’s your side.
Did you think you had conservatives trapped in some conflicting paradox of hero worship vs ideology? Did you NOT see there isn’t any cognitive dissonance here? Did you think conservatives would support dirty tricks and crime because we are somehow enamored with Rupert Murdoch? Did you think the right is tied to Murdoch like you’re tied to your messiahs Obama and Trudeau? If you did it show’s you’re a typical lefty who can’t even imagine reasoning.
You should watch FOX news, you might find out your fear and loathing is unfounded and you might learn something.