Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Don't Run
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
So this is how the environmentalist fascists figure on eliminating most folks. A little limited nuclear war at a time.
No big deal! The Earth has to be saved.
JMO
I have been following this story, and it appears to me that this is less a case of advocacy for a regional nuclear war than it is an admission that the genie is out of the bottle, and a regional nuclear war in the Middle East is more likely than not.
And of course, it’s also a bit of pre-emptive backstopping of the AGW narrative. Most of us here know, or at least strongly suspect that AGW is a complete fraud. Even the True Believers are looking for an escape clause. Bingo! What better escape clause than to proclaim that a “limited” nuclear war will stave off global warming? If the war happens, and the Earth fails to warm, or continues to cool, as it now doing, they can smugly say, “Well, it would have gotten unbearably warm, but for that recent spell of nastiness in the Middle East.”
I know nukes have had a bad rap over the years…….. but we shouldn’t dismiss the idea entirely out of hand :)-D. Suzuki
Thanks Mamba
Love the comments section at the NG. Either the editors there are hanging their heads in shame or they are the smuggest bastards on earth.
The emperor has no clothes. Sad. Why can’t they focus on what matters? Cosmopolitan nude beaches with bare boobies. That would show an outreach to all.
L.C. Bennett on the tatoos and piercings;”as radical as owning a Honda Civic”. Ah yes, committing savagery to your own body in the name of “rebellious differentiation”.
@Ken Kulak: +1. The idiots keep killing trees to send me requests to renew my application, and catalogs of gifty crap though.
Missed this one dizzy?
I missed YOU though, and the amusing way your posts remain schizophrenically unreadable and devoid of context. Cheers ol’ pal!
Have we been introduced ?
Do you know the significance of “significant” ?
I think the Daily Mail is over your head.
Oh yes, we’ve been introduced several times. Stop abusing mind-altering substances, get back on the schiz meds, and you might remember, no-lobes.
And your reply makes no more friggin’ sense than your post – if you were straight, you’d realize that and be embarrassed. I don’t know WTF the Daily Mail is, and as to the bit about the significance of significant – Jesus wept. EARTH TO DIZZY, YOU’RE RAVING AGAIN.
Oh, I see – the Daily Mail online newspaper. Gotcha. Yes, NO SIGNIFICANT WARMING. There you go. We’re on the same page all right.
You are fully aware that Phil Jones lost his job in disgrace because of the leaked emails, right? You’ve read the Climategate timeline of course, from one end to the other. You understand that the hockey-stick graph was developed from a combination of removing colder years from the GISS graphs and a 12-tree dendrochronology sample from Russia? You know about the GISS surface weather station scandal, with the majority being badly sited near air-conditioning vents and things of that nature. You’re an aware, awake person who is fully capable of thinking for yourself.
Then we’re on the same page – except I get it and you don’t. Wake up and smell the coffee: we’re being played for suckers by the mega-rich, who as usual want to get richer. You remember them surely?
Oh, I see – the online source I got my quote from. Context, Diz, always provide context if you want your audience to pay attention. Yes, NO SIGNIFICANT WARMING. What I said, just so.
The problem here, Diz, is that you think you’re smarter than me. With that obstacle to engagement with reality in your way, we’ll never get to have true dialogue. Somehow I think I’ll soldier on though.