Hey, what’s that guy doing in our office?

This story from a couple of days ago reaffirms the Liberal flair for focusing on the truly important ethical issues of our time:

Liberal MP Jim Karygiannis (Scarborough-Agincourt, Ont.) was so offended by one of the (Conservatives’) ads, which he said unethically used Mr. Harper’s office on Parliament Hill as a backdrop to pitch the record of his government in partisan fashion, that he lodged a complaint with federal Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson.

Karygiannis fumed “I think it’s up to every Member of Parliament to write to Mary Dawson and say ‘I think this is unethical,'” before adding, somewhat nonsensically –

“We don’t live in a third world country where everybody controls the media. This is a democracy and as such if you want to be democratic about it and you want to promote that you’re a good guy and you’re a good prime minister, well, have him working there at the Conservative offices.”

Rumour has it that the Liberals’ upcoming ads will show them hard at work texting CBC reporters from restaurant tables.

37 Replies to “Hey, what’s that guy doing in our office?”

  1. Evolution is a BIGGER Bitch than Karma, is it not you pathetic liberals? Canada and most of the world is painfully wakeing up to “liberalism”, and it is worse than any hangover you can self induce, voting for failure gives one, failure right Jim….. Check out California, Illinois, Spain on and on.

  2. I saw the ad and, too be sure, I couldn’t tell Mr. Harper’s office on Parliament Hill from the famous etching of the Prime Minister’s office on the back of the $300 bill.
    If anybody has a gripe it oughta be the surviving Beatles for having a coffee mug with their old Band name on it in the ad.

  3. So, Karygi-annis is outraged! Outraged! I tell ya… so is the CBC and pretty much every other MSM “Liberal” mouthpiece… nothing is more important to the media and the Libs than whining about some political “attack” ads that simply, and effectively frame a narrative that contradicts their own. The MSM and other “Liberals”, Karygi-annis, feel entitled to sell their own narrative and agenda, without the nuisance of opposition.

  4. karyginjnis or whatever, just another deranged libtard bloviator in the finest turdopian tradition
    All ON really is sore about is losing its exploitable hinterland serfs.
    Too bad suckas!
    You squandered it with electing one numerically illiterate hack after another.
    Now you’re a have not.
    Bwahahaha!
    Quit whining.
    Rob Ford will teach you how to get back to the grownups table.
    Call us when you’re ready.
    Show us by ditching the lieberals.

  5. My mother lives in his riding. She’d have the same comments to say about him – he’s unethical.
    Apparently the immigrant vote has kept him in office for the past 20+ years. I’m sure that shocks everyone, especially those outside T.O.
    The only time you hear from him is in instances like this. I’m sure even Iggy isn’t happy with his complaint.

  6. “We don’t live in a third world country where everybody controls the media. This is a democracy and as such if you want to be democratic about it and you want to promote that you’re a good guy and you’re a good prime minister, well, have him working there at the Conservative offices.”
    Wait…what?

  7. These dinks are hilarious. Too bloody stupid to realize how much of a blatant hypocrite he is on the democracy issue.
    But at least we know now that he has little stomach for barbs and jabs. Have at him.
    Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca

  8. Rumour has it that the Liberals’ upcoming ads will show them hard at work texting CBC reporters from UNDER restaurant tables.

    Fixed.

  9. Earlier this week, CBC’s Kady O’Malley was hard at work for the Liberal$, as per usual, mightily trying to find fault with this particular ad (‘funny how the Lib$ and their cronies in the media are all on the same page so fast … but that’s how texting works: instant communication):
    http://www.cbc.ca/politics/insidepolitics/2011/01/adwatch-on-prime-ministerial-offices—-of-government-and-otherwise.html
    ‘Turns out, however, that Kady and Jimmy the Greek were wrong to go off half-cocked.
    Cross-posted at Stephen Taylor’s blog (where he’s got a lot of info on this issue):
    [begin quote]
    Kady’s owned up to being mistaken about where the PM can and cannot be filmed:
    So, remember how the Conservative Party’s latest ad campaign — and, specifically, the spot filmed in the prime minister’s office — got me wondering whether it was against the rules that govern the use of parliamentary property for partisan purposes? Turns out that I may not have been entirely correct when I concluded that it likely was not — or, at the very least, wasn’t explicitly forbidden — since it was shot in his Hill office, and not his ministerial quarters across the street in Langevin.
    First, though, I must own up to a major misapprehension of my own, namely, that the prime minister, like other party leaders, is a House Officer, and, as such, governed by the by-laws enforced by the Board of Internal Economy, which lays out the rules under which they can carry out their parliamentary functions, which includes not only public and official business, but also “partisan matters.”
    There’s more:
    http://www.cbc.ca/politics/ins…
    Perhaps Kady could do her homework more thoroughly next time instead of jumping on the CBC’s let’s-criticize-the-CPC-PMSH-from-our-biased-bigoted-bandstand.
    [end quote]
    I hope Canadians can see through these bullying tactics that haven’t abated in five years. The Prime Minister and his Party, despite all of the good they’re doing for Canadians — and that’s all Canadians, not just their friends and cronies — have been unmercifully hounded and hectored by the Librano$ and their henchmen in the media ever since they took office. It’s a disgusting spectacle, and if the Liberal$ knew what was good for them, someone in their Party would put a stop to this garbage. It not only demeans our duly elected government and its leader but our country’s democratic process as well, while revealing the Liberal$ as the spoiled, entitled, immature spoilsports and poor losers they are.

  10. Funny how when PET was PM and used ads featuring his office and 24 Sussex Drive – Both provided by the taxpayer, not a word was ever said.
    Also, the latest Liberal ads use stock footage from Rumanian sources. Boy! That’s really being a proponent of Canada.

  11. Karrygiannis has kept his seat by schmoozing with the LTTE,the guys that perfected suicide bombing and are on the terrorist list of half the Countries in the Western Hemisphere, but the CPC’s ads offend his sensibilities!
    The guy’s a parody of virtue.

  12. I’m not surprised a video showing Harper’s desk enrages the leftards in office. Good gawd the lib’s dismal absentee record is enough to make the taxpayer angry. Parliment really needs a special ed room for the libs these days, wrap them in bubble wrap whilst they drool in outrage.

  13. The Liberals and their PR firm, the CBC, true to form, always trying to make mountains out of molehills in an attempt to demonize PM Harper.
    It is fine when they do the same thing. What is the big deal?

  14. batb; there is no money to steal where the liberals are presently, it is driving them and their willing accomplices in the MSM out of their intolerant minds. So far as we know we have an etical government, a good government, one that is trying to keep the economy bouyant. The longer this goes on the less 60’s and 70’s idiot liberals there are out there warping their childrens minds into the Turdopian “vision” of failure, the MSM knows this all to well since the brown bag drop offs have completely dropped off!

  15. Love Kady O’s “maybe I sorta coulda been a teensy bit off on my mildly apprehensive approach to kinda dissing the PM in so many words, so to speak”

  16. Yeah, bartinsky, I hear ya! No more money to steal is right!!! And as that is their preferred MO, it is driving them to utter distraction, to bat**it craziness.
    It’s doing the same, of course, to their Siamese twin, the CBC, thus the collusion of O’Malley and all of the other talking heads in putting the CPC in a bad light. What’s particularly galling, I’m sure, is that all of this free PR the CBC’s given the Librano$ over the years — in tandem with our “national” broadcaster’s constant barrage of negativity towards the CPC and PMSH — isn’t working.
    They’re tearing their hair out! They’re thrashing their tails! They’re beside themselves with rage!
    I wish they’d just grow up and get on with the governing of our country.

  17. Waiting to hear Dawson’s response to this comedy.
    Is she required to issue and public statement, while keeping a straight face?

  18. ‘No to coalition’
    The Liberal leader also questioned how the Tories can continue to accuse him of plotting an opposition coalition to take power, saying he has stated on the record he wants to form a Liberal government.
    “The answer is no to coalition,” Ignatieff said.
    http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2011/01/21/ignatieff-the-house-interview.html#ixzz1BmD2IGiR
    Funny how the CBC attempts to dispel rumours of a coalition in the works, attempting to do this by constantly reinforcing Iggy’s claims to the contrary with Solomon and Barton among others getting combative with Conservatives every time that claim is made by them. He said “No” so the claims have no merit, in the CBC’s view and the Tories should cease and desist. But they’ll play the “hidden agenda” card on Harper for the Liberals, continuing to use it in spite of the PM’s assurance that there isn’t one.
    CBC accepts the answer of one leader but not the other, without explaining why they hold each to a different standard of trust.
    If that doesn’t cement the CBC’s hypocritical bias and favouritism towards the Liberals, I don’t know what does.

  19. First Harper highlights Iggy signing a coalition agreement and leaving Canada back in the late 70’s (the horror)
    and now he’s failing to hide the fact that he is Prime Minister?
    It’s almost as if he’s….gulp….not trying to help Iggy win (like everyone else in the academic media complex).

  20. The hypocrisy of the left is astounding. How short the memory of the CBC et al is when it comes to attack adds. When Stockwell Day was running an election, the MSM was perpetrating one of the worst smear campaigns in Canadian history and now they seemed to have conveniently forgotten about it. When it comes to attack ads the liberals haven’t got a leg to stand on.

  21. The Liberals just seem such pathetic outcasts when they’re banished to the opposition side of the House.
    And I relish every minute of it!

  22. “Rumour has it that the Liberals’ upcoming ads will show them hard at work texting CBC reporters from restaurant tables”
    — That should read: “texting CBC, CTV and TO Star party operatives from expensive restaurant tables”

  23. Listening to The House on the CBC. That was a question to Kady O’Malley. She went through the rules and in the end no one has done it before so there is no rule. The rules made my head spin.
    Iggy was on the early segment and they did not give him a free ride. I could hear frustration in his voice at points. Did you know our deficit? He relates about that numerous times.
    Actually worth a listen.

  24. Outrageous!
    I am outraged.
    Outraged!
    The Cons behavior is outrageous!
    All Canadians are outraged!
    There, I always wondered what it felt like to be a Liberal or NDP supporter.

  25. “The Liberals just seem such pathetic outcasts when they’re banished to the opposition side of the House.”
    Actually, the Liberals are pathetic outcasts regardless of which side of the House that they’re on.

  26. “Rumour has it that the Liberals’ upcoming ads will show them hard at work texting CBC reporters from restaurant tables”
    — That should read: “texting CBC, CTV and TO Star party operatives from expensive restaurant tables”
    Posted by: Occam at January 22, 2011 10:42 AM
    Correction Occam: Should Read:”texting CBC, CTV and TO Star party operatives from under expensive restaurant tables”

  27. So we should shut down the CBC, lest the broadcaster (a national property) be used for partisan purposes.

  28. Thank goodness Jack Layton probably doesn’t read SDA, but I would wager that the NDP could double their support in the polls if the NDP would just issue a bunch of non-attack ads right now, just something where Jack says “look, this is what the NDP stands for, either ya like it and vote for it, or ya hate it and don’t.”
    These attack ads basically suck. Nobody likes them, and they bore people with irrelevant nonsense that has nothing to do with issues of the day. Moreover, they just promise more of the same, a fixation on name-calling that the average voter figures must cut into the working day of his elected representatives — people who are huddled in offices talking about what nasty things they can say next about their opponents can hardly be working on the national debt or finding an “answer” to climate change, now, can they?
    Of course it would be nice to have an attack ad on climate change, but that would require that the average I.Q. of the Canadian voter be raised to three figures, something that generations of inbreeding has rendered impossible, so we pretend there is climate change and then pretend to be doing something about it. Then it gets way colder and the joke’s on us, because the gas gets more expensive as the weather gets colder. And still, we expect the average voter to be more concerned that Michael Ignatieff missed the Chretien years than that we’ve wasted a hundred trillion bucks on windmills that don’t turn.

  29. don’t forget Bourque there occam, Peeair has been promised something real big,,,in Iggulas excellent adventure.

  30. Yep, the Liberals are the kings of ethics all right — especially the fundamentally life and death important stuff. And at the rate they are going they will be filing complaints to the Medical Officer of Health because Jim Baird doesn’t trim his toenails often enough!
    To borrow an adjective from Rush Limbaugh describing Julian Assange, I think the Liberals are “waifs”. They major in the minors. Or as the man from Nazareth once said about the hypocrites of his day: “They strain at a gnat but swallow a camel”.
    Still no complaint from the Liberal Party on the intimidation tactics of the Iranian embassy this week at Library and Archives Canada. By the way we are celebrating the 31st anniversary of the rescuing of U.S. hostages in Iran by brave Canadian diplomats, Jan 28, 1980 (http://rescueattempt.tripod.com/id7.html). But that was back in the days when some Liberals still had “cojones” and actually stood up to dictators from time to time.
    That was before the Liberal Party of Canada became the party of “waifs”.

  31. “from expensive restaurant tables”?
    I doubt it. No liberal I know ever picks up his own tab and the Liberal party of MTV can’t even pay to run their ads on the telly. Even their leader has to travel the country in a broken down bus, with his shirt tails in his underwear as the bus is towed to Harper’s Garage. I suspect that is why there are never enough liberals in the house to defeat the conservatives. They have to pool their bus money and some days there just isn’t enough for everyone.

  32. “NDP leadership campaign of Nicholas Simons receives donation from federal Liberal candidate”
    “The federal Liberal candidate in West Vancouver–Sunshine Coast–Sea-to-Sky Country, Daniel Veniez, has opened his wallet to support Nicholas Simons’s bid to become the next leader of the B.C. NDP.
    “I asked the Liberal MP-candidate on the Sunshine Coast for a donation to Nicholas Simons’ campaign, and he gave us $249 because he supports Nicholas. [Veniez] thinks he’s an awesome politician with tons of integrity,” Claudia Ferris, a volunteer with the Simons campaign, told the Straight.”
    http://www.straight.com/article-369703/vancouver/ndp-leadership-campaign-nicholas-simons-receives-donation-federal-liberal-candidate
    http://www.bluelikeyou.com/2011/01/22/iggy-still-playing-both-sides-of-the-fence/#comment-59389

  33. Poor dear from Scarborough-Agincourt, Ont.
    What could the people of Canada do to make him feel better.
    How can he go on.
    Ahh the burden.
    Shirley (sic) the Dawson lady could do something to make the “member” from Scarborough-Agincourt, Ont. make happy again.

  34. To: bartinsky at January 22, 2011 2:07 PM
    Re: Bourque
    Apparently Pierre is still refreshing his page 60 times per minute. It’s really annoying when you’re trying to read it.
    I mean, it’s not as if there’s new (links to) stuff posted there many times per day. The cynical might conclude that the auto page refresh was designed to artificially pump up the hits.
    On the other hand, financing a racing career can’t be cheap.

Navigation