Keeping face with the dragon/Grovelling for Mammon
11 Replies to “The shameless and shameful Mickey I.”
The chinese leadership was undoubtedly approached by Chairman Mo to make their comments. Chairman Mo has probably coordinated this and told his lackey in the liarberal party (A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Power Corp)* to follow up here
* have to add the legalese these days you know
Great post Darcy. Here is another rather interesting observation that Micky ‘I’ would have to confront in the real world with unbiased reporters: why would anyone trash their own country’s soldiers by accusing them of torturing murderous Taliban prisoners, directly or indirectly, by handing them over to the people they, the Taliban, had tortured in the past while kowtowing to a brutal Chinese dictatorship that tortures Chinese citizens on a random basis for non criminal activities?
It is always all about the money when the Liberanos are involved. China, with an economy based on slave labour, produces cheap products; the sale of which, enrich the head honchos.
IMO, this could not have been handled better than it was by our Honorable Prime Minister. Anyone with one iota of compassion and/or decency will say the same.
“He lost face today, and in that culture losing face is very important.” Losing face is very important? You ignorant ivory tower idiot. You simple minded purveyor of impolitically correct bullfeces. For the Chinese to make a rebuke in this fashion is indicative of the importance they place on the relationship. For anyone who is paying attention, the Chinese, after this rebuke rewarded Canada on several fronts, some unexpected. Standing strong and being firm will get you far more with Communists than all the bowing and kowtowing in the world.
The CBC and CTV’s coverage, spin and tone over this was nothing short of shameful. As if we should kow tow to the Chinese. Harper did a nice job of keeping his dignity. I would have said, “Why haven’t I come before? I’m not that into Chinese food.” and “When considering visiting a country who’s leaders have killed more people than who have ever lived in mine, I exercised typical Canadian-style caution.”
So “Don’t stay away so long next time” is now a diplomatic insult? Boy I’m glad I’m not a diplomat. I might have thought they wanted me to visit sooner because they liked me.
I feel so foolish. blush
Spector:
“China’s ambush of the Prime Minister yesterday”.
Who set up the “ambush”?
The PET Cemetery Board of Sinophiles:
Liberals Jeancula Sidewinder** Chretien, Hi-I’m Mao UNabomber Strong’s nephew Boob Lae, Cap’n CSL MartinJr, et al.
Da proof is here*: Jeancula, while in a foreign country, disses on PM Harper.
…-
“*Chretien bemoans Canada’s ‘lost foreign stature'”
“But he grew animated when asked how he believes Canada is viewed around the world.
“Our foreign policy has changed a lot and, for example, we unfortunately have disappeared from Africa and we’ve lost a lot of ground in China,” he told reporters after his speech, “and I think that it is not good.”
He said Canadian goodwill towards China began with Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s recognition of Beijing, and grew to the point where he was once told by a Chinese leader that Canada was China’s best friend.
Mr. Chretien had faint praise for the decision by Mr. Harper, who has been a harsh critic of China’s human rights record, to finally visit China later this year.
Mr. Chretien said in the three years after his 1993 election he met with the Chinese president “eight or nine times.”
“But better late than never,” he added with regard to Mr. Harper’s planned trip.” http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2119648
…-
**Sidewinder Jeancula Chretien:
Jean Chretien and the Sidewinder Report
Prime Time Crime. (Published in The WatchDog, April-June 2003 edition). Jean Chretien and the Sidewinder Report. By Ann Jane Gray. In this WatchDog article, … http://www.primetimecrime.com/contributing/2005/20050120Gray.htm
“We made a tough decision because we believe that provinces, both British Columbia and Ontario, want this legislation. They believe that it will create jobs and employment in those two provinces.”
The CITIZENS of B.C. sure as hell don’t want the HST! People here are so po’d Carole James and the NDP are a dozen points ahead of Campbell’s Libs in the polls.
Michael Ignatieff may be an intellectual, but some times it’s hard to discern if his IQ has slipped lately,or if he’s simply LYING.
dmorris; exactly. Apparently in Ignatieff’s world what the Provincial Gov’t. wants IS what the ‘province’ wants.
Tonight’s newsbroadcast suggested 90% of B.C.’ers polled were opposed to HST.
“He lost face today, and in that culture losing face is very important,” Ignatieff says.
I for one appreciate Iggy’s knowledge of Chinese culture. And I am sure that if he had actually stayed in Canada instead of leaving for nearly 30 years, he might actually have some insights or knowledge on Canada’s culture – the country he supposedly wants to lead.
I wonder what Gordo will do about the carbon tax.
Bernie @ 11:34 Easy answer, never another tax a Liberal doesn’t like.
The chinese leadership was undoubtedly approached by Chairman Mo to make their comments. Chairman Mo has probably coordinated this and told his lackey in the liarberal party (A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Power Corp)* to follow up here
* have to add the legalese these days you know
Great post Darcy. Here is another rather interesting observation that Micky ‘I’ would have to confront in the real world with unbiased reporters: why would anyone trash their own country’s soldiers by accusing them of torturing murderous Taliban prisoners, directly or indirectly, by handing them over to the people they, the Taliban, had tortured in the past while kowtowing to a brutal Chinese dictatorship that tortures Chinese citizens on a random basis for non criminal activities?
It is always all about the money when the Liberanos are involved. China, with an economy based on slave labour, produces cheap products; the sale of which, enrich the head honchos.
IMO, this could not have been handled better than it was by our Honorable Prime Minister. Anyone with one iota of compassion and/or decency will say the same.
“He lost face today, and in that culture losing face is very important.” Losing face is very important? You ignorant ivory tower idiot. You simple minded purveyor of impolitically correct bullfeces. For the Chinese to make a rebuke in this fashion is indicative of the importance they place on the relationship. For anyone who is paying attention, the Chinese, after this rebuke rewarded Canada on several fronts, some unexpected. Standing strong and being firm will get you far more with Communists than all the bowing and kowtowing in the world.
The CBC and CTV’s coverage, spin and tone over this was nothing short of shameful. As if we should kow tow to the Chinese. Harper did a nice job of keeping his dignity. I would have said, “Why haven’t I come before? I’m not that into Chinese food.” and “When considering visiting a country who’s leaders have killed more people than who have ever lived in mine, I exercised typical Canadian-style caution.”
So “Don’t stay away so long next time” is now a diplomatic insult? Boy I’m glad I’m not a diplomat. I might have thought they wanted me to visit sooner because they liked me.
I feel so foolish. blush
Spector:
“China’s ambush of the Prime Minister yesterday”.
Who set up the “ambush”?
The PET Cemetery Board of Sinophiles:
Liberals Jeancula Sidewinder** Chretien, Hi-I’m Mao UNabomber Strong’s nephew Boob Lae, Cap’n CSL MartinJr, et al.
Da proof is here*: Jeancula, while in a foreign country, disses on PM Harper.
…-
“*Chretien bemoans Canada’s ‘lost foreign stature'”
“But he grew animated when asked how he believes Canada is viewed around the world.
“Our foreign policy has changed a lot and, for example, we unfortunately have disappeared from Africa and we’ve lost a lot of ground in China,” he told reporters after his speech, “and I think that it is not good.”
He said Canadian goodwill towards China began with Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s recognition of Beijing, and grew to the point where he was once told by a Chinese leader that Canada was China’s best friend.
Mr. Chretien had faint praise for the decision by Mr. Harper, who has been a harsh critic of China’s human rights record, to finally visit China later this year.
Mr. Chretien said in the three years after his 1993 election he met with the Chinese president “eight or nine times.”
“But better late than never,” he added with regard to Mr. Harper’s planned trip.”
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2119648
…-
**Sidewinder Jeancula Chretien:
Jean Chretien and the Sidewinder Report
Prime Time Crime. (Published in The WatchDog, April-June 2003 edition). Jean Chretien and the Sidewinder Report. By Ann Jane Gray. In this WatchDog article, …
http://www.primetimecrime.com/contributing/2005/20050120Gray.htm
“We made a tough decision because we believe that provinces, both British Columbia and Ontario, want this legislation. They believe that it will create jobs and employment in those two provinces.”
The CITIZENS of B.C. sure as hell don’t want the HST! People here are so po’d Carole James and the NDP are a dozen points ahead of Campbell’s Libs in the polls.
Michael Ignatieff may be an intellectual, but some times it’s hard to discern if his IQ has slipped lately,or if he’s simply LYING.
dmorris; exactly. Apparently in Ignatieff’s world what the Provincial Gov’t. wants IS what the ‘province’ wants.
Tonight’s newsbroadcast suggested 90% of B.C.’ers polled were opposed to HST.
“He lost face today, and in that culture losing face is very important,” Ignatieff says.
I for one appreciate Iggy’s knowledge of Chinese culture. And I am sure that if he had actually stayed in Canada instead of leaving for nearly 30 years, he might actually have some insights or knowledge on Canada’s culture – the country he supposedly wants to lead.
I wonder what Gordo will do about the carbon tax.
Bernie @ 11:34 Easy answer, never another tax a Liberal doesn’t like.