Science published today yet-another-Mann-et-al-reconstruction
And nobody caught the part that was upside down.
Meanwhile, the timed-to-Copenhagen drumbeat of manufactured alarmism continues to rise unquestioned by a media too stupid to realize that increasingly large portions of their audience are already 7 days into this file. And that their late-to-the-game pronouncements about “a few emails” only reveal that they’re too damned lazy to look for themselves.
Yesterday, the emails were lying. Today, the satellites are lying.
Because a guy in a boat says so.
I feel as though I’ve woken up inside a Michael Crichton novel.

My greatest fear is that PM Harper will go “with the floe” in Copenhagen and fark Canada for the foreseeable future. That leaves conservative thinking voters with nobody to vote for come next election.
I can’t help but compare this to Ezra Levants ordeal with the HRC.
MSM trying to keep the lid on as it goes viral on the internet.
Dig people dig. Google is easy.
Identify the players, lift the rocks.
If you don’t know who the likes of george soros, Mo strong are tou should educate your self. The connections of maurice strong to the past liberal governments alone is staggering.
GOOGLE NEIN, BING YES:
I just experimented- typed in CLIMATEGATE ON GOOGLE Website-Nada, Nada on thei list.
Then on to Bing: BINGO: comes up second on the list.
GOOGLE NEIN, BING YES:
I just experimented- typed in CLIMATEGATE ON GOOGLE Website-Nada, Nada on thei list.
Then on to Bing: BINGO: comes up second on the list.
Tried bing and only got 3 day old stale results.
Climategate perpetrators, perpetuators, by-standers and victims.
A good summary over at examiner.com
‘Speculation is the only explanation that fits the attempted use of tree rings, ice cores, swamp sediments etc to indicate past temperatures.’
Yup, ‘stamp collecting’, to quote Ernest Rutherford.
I feel as though I’ve woken up inside a Michael Crichton novel.
I know what you mean. It’s evolution.
Galápagos – Kurt Vonnegut:
…that all the sorrows of humankind were caused by “the only true villain in my story: the oversized human brain”. Fortunately, natural selection eliminates this problem, since the humans best fitted to Santa Rosalía were those who could swim best, which required a streamlined head, which in turn required a smaller brain size.
Did you ever notice that so called news sites that like to trumpet this AGW garbage never have a comments section? Just an observation.
Warren…cbc.ca has a really important story on the pregnant pipe fish…really, and they are allowing comments there…
Perhaps we could dump a few headspinners in the comment section there….
We gotta keep shaking this tree to see what falls out, then rip it out by the roots and examine what lies there.
Some Guy in a boat…
Research involves
Doing field and theoretical research to expand scientific knowledge of the effects of global warming on sea ice in the Arctic, and to develop more effective tools to predict, and deal with, its potentially harmful effects.
Research relevance
Helping protect Canada’s Arctic environment for future generations.
Protecting Our Polar Populations
Every day, new newspaper headlines around the world warn us about the potential impacts of global warming on our environment. The polar regions are widely predicted to be the first, and most severely, affected. More scientific research is needed, however, to improve our knowledge and understanding of the challenges of global warming.
Is he right or is he wrong?
Or is he just conveniently greasing the wheels on the research funding machine?
he he, went over to the young greens and left them a comment.
guys,
CRU ****ED UP YOUR CRISIS!
ask Liz to explain.
useless of course, but gave me a giggle for today.
Is he right or is he wrong? Or is he just conveniently greasing the wheels on the research funding machine?
Precisely. If the peer review process is corrupt, then nothing that is issued in a scientific journal can be considered untainted.
WUWT?
…-
“Climategate protester pawns CBC on live TV
27 11 2009
How interesting that it has now risen to this level. Climategate? Quel Climategate?”
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/27/climategate-protester-pawns-cbc-on-live-tv/#more-13297
life was soooo simple when a nice little ” lier lier pants on fire ” would shut them twits up for a good long time.
The more time I spend analyzing this issue, the closer I come to the conclusion that the main problem with the computer climate models is that they try to cover far too many bases.
~Dennis
Nah, the computer models were never anything more than hopped up Nintendo games designed to aid the Flim Flam Mann.
Just a visual aid to sell the con, the electronic version of the actor in the lab coat in the TV commercial selling you patent medicine that doesn’t work.
CBC and the Munk debates. 26 comments and the discussion is closed.
How low will their credibility go.
Of course, our esteemed professor never gave his co-ordinates or GPS track of his ‘rotten ice’….
If he is such a brilliant fellow, why didn’t he show where he went excatly? If he was traversing along the edge of the ice flow, is it any surprise that he was going thru immature ice? Or, as previously mentioned, through a track of ice that had already been ‘shipped’?
As well, for somebody SO educated, he might also realize that the ice pack moves, and rotates with current and wind. Therefore, whatever he was looking at in terms of satellite imagery, may not have coincided with his location.
Again, the lack of details he gave is staggering.
If the ship had of been travelling due north, towards the pole, there might be some credence given to him. As is, he certainly didn’t make that claim.
“Trust me, I’m a scientist!”
The IPCC claims”>http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10405553-54.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0″>claims Climategate in no way undermines the the credibility of their findings. But follow their logic: they claim that “The entire report writing process of the IPCC is subjected to extensive and repeated review. There is, therefore, no possibility of exclusion of any contrarian views, if they have been published in established journals or other publications which are peer reviewed.” So it looks like their entire case for AGW now rests on the fact that all of their articles are peer reviewed, and any contrary evidence will only be considered if it too is peer reviewed. I think it’s time to get the few members of the MSM who will report about this to focus on the hijacking of the entire peer review process. Topple the peer-review pillar, which we now know is faulty, and their whole argument comes crashing down.
It’s important to bear in mind that Mann’s “reconstructions” are somewhat misnamed, since as pointed out by the authors of “Taken by Storm” they are in fact, constructions i.e. there is no gold standard set of temperature records to which their proxy results can be compared. Since no one was around compiling temperature records with thermometers for most of the period over which Mann’s graphs run they are utterly unverifiable with respect to their accuracy — especially not to within the arbitrarily chosen confidence interval displayed. In short, they are guesses — educated guesses (although now even that appears to be in grave doubt) but guesses none the less.
“Al Gore Flees in Panic from Chicago Book Signing
Over at DOOM daily.
Posted by: orvict at November 27, 2009 5:16 PM ”
got a link??? some of us know doom only as a p**spoor game!
http://www.topix.com/who/al-gore/2009/11/gore-flees-in-panic-from-chicago-book-signing
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2395260/posts
Who you gonna believe? Me or your lying eyes? Give me your money.
http://www.larouchepac.com/node/12520
ooops
post above is the link that Doom referred to in it’s post
The esteemed perfesser is pretty good at the grant game.
PERSONAL DATA FORM: David G. Barber. Ph.D.
FUNDING: 142 Grants for a total of $17,428,376 (1993-present)2006
http://web.mac.com/barber1818/iWeb/D.G.Barber/Welcome_files/Barber_CV_3pages.pdf
set you free wrote: “The Piltdown Man scam goes back nearly 100 years ago.”
Don’t forget the Cardiff Giant, another famous hoax:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardiff_Giant
“The Cardiff Giant was one of the most famous hoaxes in U.S. history. It was a 10-foot (3.0 m)-tall purported “petrified man” uncovered on October 16, 1869 by workers digging a well behind the barn of William C. “Stub” Newell in Cardiff, New York. Both it and an unauthorized copy made by P.T. Barnum are still on display.”
[…]
“The Cardiff Giant appeared in the 1901 Pan-American Exposition but did not attract much attention. An Iowa publisher bought it later to adorn his basement rumpus room as a coffee table and conversation piece. In 1947 he sold it to the Farmers’ Museum in Cooperstown, New York, where it is still on display.”
“the difference with AGW is that there was never any “science” involved. It has been entirely based on Speculation.”
Actually, if you read some of Chrichton’s writing, you’ll see that he says, “speculation…
Oh nevermind, found it:
http://www.michaelcrichton.net/speech-whyspeculate.html