Reader Tips

Good evening ladies and gentlemen, welcome to SDA Late Nite Radio. Tonight, for your delectation and pursuant to our Tuesday night vintage music show, here is Mr. Maurice Burkhart performing The Yiddisha Professor on Edison Blue Amberol cylinder #1643 in 1913 (MP3, 3.8 MB, 4:07).

Update: Here is Vitruvius TV from 2008-10-14 20:00 to 21:30 MDT…
(The horizontal light gray line represents ΣVe/n for the last four days.)

Clearly, Prime Minister Harper’s Conservative Party of Canada
has a stronger mandate after this election than it did before.

Your Reader Tips are, as always, welcome in the comments.


The above graph shows the seat counts (declared + leading) for the various parties, as screen-scraped every minute from the National Post and CBC web sites from 20:00 to 21:30 MDT on 2008-10-14. Well, that was fun to watch grow. Note that it would appear that the Post had some troubles tonight 😉

Ve came in about two points higher than the pollsters had forecast, the opposite of the last two elections, yet the actual score came in closer to the forecast Ve than the final Ve. I’ll add the new data point and the final graphs to my Ve essay later, and think about what it means, later, but it’s been a long day for me so not now.

122 Replies to “Reader Tips”

  1. currently the reality is that in order to win a majority a party has to win at least fifteen ormore seats in Quebec. So a waste of time campaigning there it is not.
    However within a generation – the next three election cycles- that will not be the case. By the next election up to ten new seats will be added in ontario Alberta and BC almost all of them in safe blue areas.
    Once que. Reaches true irrelevancy on the national political scene the final “put up or shut up” moment will happen to the separatists.
    The truly great achievement of Stephen harper thusfar (he has a lot more to add yet) is that he has made the new Canada – the Canada west of Ontario – a conservative fortress – the biggest political powerbase in the land.

  2. Robert W.:
    “Now a question: If Stephen Harper just chooses to run his gov’t like a majority, bringing strict law & order bills, etc. in front of Parliament, will the Liberals have the balls to defeat these bills, knowing that it’ll immediately force another election?
    I think not but would love to have someone provide a counterpoint.”
    Well, that’s it exactly. Harper’s back with a minority but he knows that the opposition won’t dare risk forcing another election anytime soon.
    No doubt the Conservatives would have preferred a majority (any party worth its salt would). But an improved minority – with an opposition scared to death about risking the ire of Canadians by toppling the government and forcing yet another election on us – will do just fine.
    That Harper guy. I tell you. Smooth.

  3. blanks;
    Good points but I see the glass as more full than empty. In the big picture, I don’t see any electoral math that ends up with a Lib government any time soon. They’re simply nowhere in 2 of the 3 largest areas in the country and they’ll never win as long as that’s true.
    If I remember correctly, the Libs haven’t won the majority of seats in Quebec since Trudeau in 1980. Its been more than a while. In the West, they’re virtually toxic. Their rehabilitation period in both those places would seem to be lengthy.
    With Conservative vote splitting over, Ontario can’t deliver the Libs to power on their own anymore. Even a solid Liberal win here wouldn’t have overcome the western block.
    So yeah. While I’d have preferred a majority too, I’m pretty happy with where we are. We won solidly in Ontario and by a crushing margin in the West. That’s a good recipe for the long term, be it a majority or a minority that governs for most of the time as if it had a defacto majority. Varying shades of good to my mind.

  4. Epitaph for Citoyen Dion in the PET Cemetery.
    “I love my country more than ever,”
    (ctv)
    Fin.

  5. The worst thing that happened in yesterday’s election was that little shit Justine Turdeau winning a seat in the riding of Papineau!

  6. The discussion on both networks about Dion’s future involving long sharp pointy things, the list of possible successors were mention.
    I noticed that, in the one case I watched, the second coming wasn’t officially started by mentioning Justin.

  7. Some time today Kyoto the dog will be taken out back and shot.
    His owner . . . figuratively so in the coming days.

  8. There’s more credence to the term “Goofy Newfies”,they really did a job on themselves at the behest of the their dear Leader, Danny Boy Williams.
    They shot off both feet.
    Quebec has sent us a message they really aren’t serious about Canada.
    The low point throughout the campaign for Liberals was the constant slagging of Harper by “Mr. nice guy”, Steffi, who called Mr. Harper a liar incessantly. Looks like the smarter people of Canada didn’t agree.
    Now Craig Oliver and company can fawn over The Trudeau spawn who’s wet behind the ears in politics.

  9. Tories “win” in Parkdale-High Park. Dion’s No. 1 disciple is elected and has a high enough profile that he’ll be a front bench guy… CPC can always point to him for humor in QP. As well, I’m actually glad Goodale won. What would the LPC be without it’s most identifable blowhard? Also, Garth losing is great! Ditto for the Liberals in Vancouver-Kingsway. So much anger for Emerson from Liberal voters (82% voted Liberal in 2006) for switching to the CPC that they elected an NDP candidate… Liberal candidate just 28%. Losing both party-crossing seats is just so sweet.

  10. liberals are sad today But not all that bad for them, as Now they can turf Dion without losing face. Top ranking libs that wanted Dion out from the getgo wish though that the conservatives had won a majority as this would have bought them the time they need to rebuild their party.
    On another note comments made by Rae last nite in his joyfull interview on ctv shows that he is just itching to overthrow the conservatives with a coalition of the left(much like he did in 79), My bet after the leadership conv. march 09.
    Did anyone notice the smiles on ctv when interviewing the top ranking liberal winners. Another prediction after watching Rae/Iggy the radical left will now be able to take over the liberals & i would predict also that we are going to see a defection of the more center libs.

  11. Message to Taliban Jack Layton(NDP):
    Flypaper is working.
    Get ’em. More, and faster.
    …-
    “18 Taliban militants killed in clash with Afghan troops”
    http://tinyurl.com/4dhmr2 (thaindian)
    …-
    “The More Iraq Calms Down, The More Warriors Show Up in Afghanistan, The More Violence Increases, The More People Die”
    “Most of the non-Afghan warriors are Pakistanis, Arabs, and from some other Muslim countries, U.S. commanders said. They recorded that some radical groups support fighters to go to Afghanistan, not to Iraq in order to increase the number of insurgents in the region.”
    http://www.turkishweekly.net/news.php?id=60194

  12. Bryanr, the Libs won’t get rid of Dion too easily, he said in an interview he would not quit, saying “I am not a quitter”. I say stay on Steffi, we love ya baby.
    To Quebec voters who voted to continue to play Canada like a fiddle, I say burn, baby burn. Canada has played that game far too long and to top it off, that resource rich “province” is on the dole through equalization. Shameful.
    Since Separation is off their agenda what’s their purpose beyond playing dirty political pool in their selfish little Fiefdom.

  13. “I’m afraid to look at Craig Oliver. Has his head exploded yet?” Posted by: Marcia
    Almost. He has slipped into every conversation numerous times so far, what have the Cons gained, it’s all right back where we were, we got back to back minority governments, for what?.
    Well Ollie, here it is: Harper destroyed the Liberals. In case you didn’t notice, Harper gained back to back Liberal losses. That’s the news here.

  14. just some information for the MSM , who continue to push Borat Dions contribution to the clarity act ( seems like a misnomer now after the CTV interview) the clarity act started on the other side of the house
    The Clarity Act was created in response to the 1995 Quebec referendum and ongoing independence movement in that province. In 1996, Reform MP
    Stephen Harper introduced a loosely similar private member’s bill, the Quebec Contingency Act (working title Bill C-341).[2] The content of the Clarity Act was based on the 1998 secession reference to the Supreme Court of Canada made by the federal government under Jean Chrétien. First introduced in the Canadian House of Commons on December 13, 1999, it was subsequently passed by the Commons on March 15, 2000, and by the Senate on June 29, 2000.

  15. Liz J…I agree wholeheartedly.Enough!
    We know PMSH is a smart man.Quebec played the same game with Libs…the Libs didn’t know when to quit and it balooned in to Adscam.
    I believe PMSH knows when to say enough.

  16. Watch for Ujjal Dosanjh to team with Bob Rae for the leadership of the Liberals. Listening to the bitterness of Dosanjh as he talked about what the Liberals would do in this coming parliament showed that this is a vitriolic and dangerous man.

  17. Great programme, Vitruvius. The combination of humour and music is very powerful. Which brings up the obvious question: any chance of another appearance by Victor Borge on SDA LNR?

  18. I think this was an extremely important election. It’s not about getting a majority; it’s about structural shifts.
    The MSM, who showed us clearly last night, that they are all Liberal supporters, kept talking about a ‘Harper minority’, grudgingly admitting that it was a ‘slightly larger’ minority. They also put all the blame for the Liberal losses on Dion. I suggest they are Playing the Liberal Game, which means, to firmly stick your head in a deep sandpile and blow dust.
    Only Coyne mentioned that the Liberals have to do some thinking – that they are reduced to the cities of Toronto and Montreal and have no representation west of that.
    I’m suggesting that this election was not about only showing, but also solidifying, a structural shift in Canada’s economic and social structure. The Liberals refuse to see this and blaming Dion is an error.
    Yes, Dion is trapped in an academic bubble, locked in the secure non-pragmatic rhetoric of the seminar room where his word is Truth. Yes, he hasn’t a clue about the real world; he’s urban, he’s cocooned in supermarkets and city services. Yes, he can’t speak English. Yes, he’s manipulative (his ten percent is really 1.5 percent). But, the real problem is the Liberal viewi of What is Canada.
    Liberals see Canada, still, in the post WWII structure of centralism, where authority and power are based around Quebec and Ontario and the West is irrelevant. They have no interest in or knowledge of anything outside this centralist zone of Ottawa-Montreal.
    Liberals also see Canada, from this centralist standpoint, as necessarily ruled by a central Big Govt that takes your taxes and does everything from one type of daycare to one type of healthcare to… You follow their word.
    The Harper mode, and it is his view and not simply a Conservative idea, is decentralization, where more decision-making and fiscal power moves to the local people. Ottawa moves out of these areas and focuses only on a smaller set of duties. This view acknowledges all areas of Canada as economically unique. It requires and operates within a citizenry that is involved in their own affairs. The centralist mode works only with a passive citizenship.
    The West will be getting new seats in the House in a few years, to acknowledge its increase in population (more than that of Quebec). This will further shift the structural make-up of Canada.
    Immigration? The Liberal idea is to ‘bring them in’, support them with subsidies and taxes, isolate them, freeze them as non-integrative people, and make them dependent on this money..and get their votes.
    The Conservative idea is to bring in only those who can economically exist in Canada, don’t isolate them, don’t make them dependent on welfare and subsidies. And they vote as they want.
    The other problem that our MSM pundits are not dealing with, besides this tectonic shift in demographics and economy, is Quebec. The Bloc.
    The insanity of giving one province its own political party, a federal party, and insert a criterion to be allowed to vote for that party, has set up a dysfunctional situation in our parliament. The criterion to be allowed to vote for the Bloc is not the old ones which we’ve since rejected in favour of universal suffrage. It’s not land ownership, gender, ethnicity, race. It’s geographic. To vote for the Bloc, you must live in Quebec. Yet, this Bloc makes decisions about all of us. Yet, as a party, it is not accountable to all of us.
    The Bloc is NOT about separation. It’s the default party in Quebec. It’s the ‘Natural Governing Party’ in Quebec. It’s about and only about Quebec. Naturally, most people will vote for it. Why not? Quebecers aren’t interested in governing the ROC. Why not? Because the ROC, to Quebecers, is a foreign country. They have no interest in Canada at all. They only see themselves as trapped within it, and they use it for what they can get. They have nothing to offer Canada because it is a foreign country. Any alliances they have with other foreign countries are only with francophone countries.
    Yet we have a situation here in Canada where the Bloc regularly takes at least 50 and more seats from the House for itself, thus rendering any other party without a majority. Why do we put up with this?
    Suggestion to Harper? Ignore Quebec. Stop pandering to them. We can’t get rid of the Bloc by pandering and bribing Quebecers. So, stop pandering to them. Ignore them – focus on Ontario and the West. Focus on the strength of Canada and not its weak area, ie, Quebec. Maybe Quebec will wake up and decide to join the world, and Canada.
    As for the Liberal Party, they can blame Dion. But he’s not their problem. They’ll probably blame him, put in a ‘charismatic’ leader such as Rae. Or even, of all things, Justin Trudeau. Both choices show a deep contempt for Canadians, defining the electorate as merely susceptible to ‘bread and circuses’. We’ll see.

  19. So Mr. “As Influential as the Main Stream Media” and all round clairvoyant has fired himself I see.

  20. Good election for the Tories, but nothing’s going to change. They don’t have a majority, and they are up against 3 left of center parties. Will they be able to do anything radical, or even ambitious? Probably not. More of the same for another 4 years.
    Harper should emerge from this a seasoned centrist.

  21. I couldn’t vote for any of the main party’s
    I voted for the Christian Heritage party for two main reasons.
    1)Henry Morgentaler received the order of Canada
    This butchers only claim to fame is murdering babies. I don’t care what your view on abortion is, I think all of us can agree there are far more deserving Canadians out there.
    2)24 billion just handed over to the banks. The same banks the have gouged us for years, making obscene profits year after year, with the prime minister smugly saying, “its just pocket change.” 1 8th of the overall budget $718 dollars lumped on the backs of every single Canadian is not pocket change.
    Peter

  22. good job on the index Vitruvius !!
    looked to be within the margerine of error as they would say on the rigs.

  23. (Via Melanie Phillips) Stanley Kurtz, Wright 101
    It looks like Jeremiah Wright was just the tip of the iceberg. Not only did Barack Obama savor Wright’s sermons, Obama gave legitimacy — and a whole lot of money — to education programs built around the same extremist anti-American ideology preached by Reverend Wright. And guess what? Bill Ayers is still palling around with the same bitterly anti-American Afrocentric ideologues that he and Obama were promoting a decade ago. All this is revealed by a bit of digging, combined with a careful study of documents from the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, the education foundation Obama and Ayers jointly led in the late 1990s…

  24. Gordon Campbell, were you paying close attention to the voters in BC?
    Keith Martin squeezed through, but he is the voice for change in what goes on with HRCs.
    So, he may have to get his game on to push harder on this issue. Can he work with the government to get it done?
    Welcome back to John Duncan, CPC, from Vancouver Island, who defeated the NDP one-timer.
    Dona Cadman…going to have her work cut out for her, on any number of levels.

  25. Comments about what the election “cost” us are tiresome and irrelevant. Clearly Liberals were looking at taking down the government after the U.S. elections. So, if Harper did not call for an election when he did, we would be “paying for one” a couple of months down the line. Minority governments will last about two years (or less). If Canadians are concerned about elections happening too frequently, there is an obvious solution.

  26. Well Ollie, here it is: Harper destroyed the Liberals. In case you didn’t notice, Harper gained back to back Liberal losses. That’s the news here.
    Wrong sounder the news is it was the lowest level of liberal support since 1867.
    I think that is THE story.

  27. Suffused with the usual MSM anti-religious bigotry and urban elitism, but still worth reading:
    (Via Comment Central) Mark Jacobson, Sarah Palin’s Heaven
    Wasilla—moose, malls, and snow machines in the most beautiful landscape on earth—is paradise for a certain kind of person. So why would a real Alaskan go anywhere else?

  28. Agree – a major story of this election is the Harper took out the Liberals.
    Remember, that’s been his agenda, which he has openly stated, to take out the Liberals ‘from the bottom up’ by gradually, incrementally, destroying their financial reserves.
    The fact that the Liberals have a dysfunctional view of Canada that is centralist and operates via Big Govt is the Liberal’s fault. But, removing their ability to manipulate the public – has been Harper’s task. The Liberals don’t work by intellect and debate; they work by emotion. That requires a charismatic style leader who appeals to the emotions.
    The Liberal financial coffers are empty. Their old reliance on money from big corporations was ended by Chretien, who assured himself that without him, the Liberal Party was toast. Harper further reduced funding to about 1,000 per individual donor. Liberal party members don’t donate to their party; they expect their taxes to deal with everything.
    But another MAJOR point of this campaign was that Harper won it for himself and the Conservatives. The 2006 election is in large part a reaction by the electorate to the Liberal Sponsorship scandal. This election wasn’t a reaction but an action. In favour of Harper.
    The Liberals are going to try to blame it on Dion, but it isn’t all his fault. The Liberals are trapped in a totally out-of-date view of Canada; and their disdain for the West (leftists call all Conservatives rednecks), for the non-urban lifestyle shows – the Liberals won seats only in the big cities and the socialist areas that are dependent on Big Govt.
    It was a strategic election, and Harper achieved his goals. A majority would have, as others have noted, given the Liberals time to regroup. But Harper can govern as a majority because none of the other parties can afford an election.
    As for costs of an election, with Dion and Layton both threatening to bring the govt down, it would have come this year anyway.

  29. It’s a fine morning for freedom and hence free thinkers. I worked the election yesterday and of 222 voters in our poll 156 voted Harper, 21 each for Lib, NDP and Green. That was impressive even by the standards of a poll that has overwhelmingly voted Conservative since the election of ’85, that would be 1885. My only question would be “Where the hell did the 21 Greens come from?”.
    Using those numbers as a guide I can see why the carbon tax went up in smoke last night. Nice work by Liberal strategists to preface the Green Shift with an endorsement from Suzuki. What can you expect from a leader who names his dog after a Mo Strong initiative. Get over it people, AGW is as D-E-A-D as Dion’s career in politics.
    Elizabeth May is bragging about her outstanding victory. I’d recommend she spent some late night reading time studying Custer’s strategy at the Little Big Horn. She is an American after all despite her ersatz Cape Breton “roots”.
    On the brighter side the Liberals managed to elect another winner in the form of Justin Trudeau. He carries his fathers surname and his mother’s political acumen, neither of which will be big sellers for that party.
    Returning to the subject of AGW, Garth went down in flames last night. Garth.ca is on hiatus until the end of the month out of respect for more of the politically dead. Too bad since I really enjoyed the anti Harper froth and foam from his dozen or so regulars. I guess they will have to move on to one of those boutique sites like Canadian Cynic or Desmogblog. They offer safe haven for all political loons.

  30. Remember when Scott Reid said “Alberta Can Blow Me”…well i guess HE will have to blow Alberta if he ever hopes to get back in!

  31. Wow – alot of excitement in here for another minority government.
    $300 million for a meaningless election that broke the election law Harper put in place. A strategic play, done with other people’s money (easy to spend that, no?). And it didn’t pay off.
    The Libranos, with an accident for a leader, a massive piece of social engineering and tax in the Green Shift, still managed to pull 75+ seats out of the air, running a crappy campaign with a non-photogenic geek.
    All for the same position previous.
    Since the Conervative fetish-ist partisans in here are all randy – let’s see as these Cons continue to move eastward in their policies – how long y’all can rationalize it.
    Let’s start with the $25 billion dollar slap and tickle to the banks, which bought up assets with taxpayer money – that were not critical to their functioning. Let’s see, how much is $25 billion btw?
    On the upshot, the wisdom of crowds saw that unelected bagman from Quebec tossed on his derriere. Fortier will have his hand back out again – lets see who can guess which 6 figure Crown corp job he’ll get dropped into….anyone?
    Would the Libranos do any different?
    No. They wouldn’t.

  32. Hardboiled:
    Thats ok, Harper will now govern as if he had a majority and do exactly what will be good for the country wheather YOU like it or not…suck it up!

  33. “Another long-time Liberal said on Tuesday night:
    “It will be tough for him to have the … authority to lead.
    We are the natural governing party.””
    …-
    “Dion’s future questioned after renewed Tory minority
    “party ended the night with 76 seats – down from 95 when the election was called – and just 26.2 per cent of popular support, a historic low that surpasses the 28 per cent the John Turner-led Liberals garnered in 1984.”
    (g-m)

  34. Yep. He could have done that before. Now he gets to do it again. 3 elections in 4 years. On the taxpayers dime.
    Woo! You go girl!
    A meaningless election gerrymandered for the ruling party’s own benefit, that effectively changed nothing, except for the size of the payments now going to the Green Party annually.
    Yah! Alright! Yeah! Take THAT Dion! Boo-Yeah!

  35. “Thats ok, Harper will now govern as if he had a majority and do exactly what will be good for the country wheather YOU like it or not…suck it up!”
    Hahaha. Do you really believe that?
    It’s a stalemate. The Liberals in a minority government can occassionally appeal to parties further to the left to get things done. Who is Harper going to turn to? Dion? Layton?
    Harper can TRY to rule it like a majority, but you can bet on more of the same. I expect Harper will turn into a Chretien style centrist within the next two years. Its the only way he will get anything done. Theres no allies on the right to help him out – he is the right. And everyone else is on the other side of the center.
    Big victory, no doubt. Will it change anything? Probably not.

  36. I love the fiberals short memory or is that selective memory, cripes I recall that cretian guy called one every other year for a decade it seemed.
    Suck it up losers!
    Heh heh!
    🙂
    THE GREENS ARE TOAST and that’s worth it to me!
    Bonus is libs losing seats,
    the dart is the ndp – unions right?
    So they support the Canadian postal union leader stating that he hasn’t decided whether to ban mail from Israel or not YET…hmn?

  37. I love the fiberals short memory or is that selective memory, cripes I recall that cretian guy called one every other year for a decade it seemed.
    Suck it up losers!Heh heh! 🙂
    Heh indeed. Especially that you are talking to Conservatives. And reminding them that their guy is channelling Cretin.
    And the Greens didn’t get rubbed bozo. They have increased the cheques they get from the government by $500,000 per year.
    A $300 million dollar election for nothing. A ‘fixed date’ election law that exists only when convienient. Despite promises to the contrary.
    Useful idiots indeed.

  38. No, Harper can govern like a majority because none of the other parties, who are all leftists, can afford an election. Either financially or politically.
    Harper’s strategy was to destroy the Liberal structure from the bottom-up, ie, internally rather than externally. An external win relies on a key crisis situation and/or a charismatic leader; that is, it’s an emotional rather than rational win. Chretien and Trudeau carried out external win campaigns. And of course, Chretien relied on the multiple splits in the opposition into both right and left parties.
    Harper’s 2006 win was an ‘external win’. It was based on voter disgust with the Liberal Sponsorship corruption, with the clear, simple five-point pragmatic realism of the Conservatives.
    This win was an internal win – and it’s far more damaging to the Liberals than is obvious in an external win. It further broke the Liberals financially and, it moved the Conservative base into stronger and stronger positions throughout the country.
    You can see this incremental increase in Ontario, the former Liberal stronghold – and in Toronto, where Liberals have retained their seats by drastically reduced margins, with the Conservatives gaining in votes.
    The Liberals have been isolated to the cities, particularly Toronto and Montreal, and as I said, their base is weakening here. They have nothing in the West; they have nothing to speak of in Quebec, which has been handed over to an anomaly of a party, the Bloc. My suggestion is to totally ignore Quebec from now on. Stop pandering to it.
    The suggestions that ‘this was an unnecessary election and costly’ ignore that Dion and Layton were both itching to take down the govt. But now, they won’t dare.
    I also suspect that Dion won’t step down; he’ll stay on for a while until the Liberals try to steal some more money. The Liberals can’t afford an election.
    They can’t put a ‘charismatic leader’ into the House who will have to sit on his hands because he can’t call an election. That’s not good for his charismatic image, which only operates in crisis modes.
    So, I suspect they’ll keep Dion until they can get some money.

  39. I would like to express my compliments to our friends in Ontario for voting in so much blue last night.
    Many times in the past I would turn on the TV at 8:00 only to find that the Liberals had already been declared in a majority after getting 100 seats in Ontario.
    Looks like there could be two new women named to the cabinet(Gail Shea,PEI and Lisa Raitt,Ont) and that can’t hurt the Tories in Ontario so I think the seeds have been planted for future success there when the next election comes around.
    There were even some major dents knocked into the Liberal armor in the GTA which will also bode well for the future.
    Danny Williams could rue the day he started the ABC campaign but then again, who cares?

  40. Congratulations to the Right Honourable Mr. Stephen Harper and the CPC on the election results.

  41. widkerman — “Who is Harper going to turn to? Dion? Layton?” Actually, I believe he did appeal to each and all of these parties in turn in the last minority government. Otherwise he would not have lasted so long, nor accomplished so much. You are also exaggerating how much to the “right” Harper is. His government has pretty much ruled from the centre — a necessity in this country. (Gasps about anything even slightly to the right have been grossly overblown by the media.) You need to get past your “left wing” blinders, which really fail to see reality.

  42. (Via SWJ) Mark Magnier, China land reform disappears from radar
    A funny thing happened on the way to the Third Plenary Session of the 17th Central Committee, where China’s Communist Party leaders were expected to finally enact a bold land reform program allowing farmers eventually to buy, sell or lease their fields.
    Coverage of reform issues had been stepped up in the official press. And President Hu Jintao made a high-profile trip to rural Anhui province, where state media said he told farmers that they would be able to transfer their land rights.
    Yet by the time the closed-door meeting wrapped up Sunday, the issue had all but disappeared from public view. It wasn’t even mentioned in the final communique from the 368-member decision-making body…

  43. Frederick W. Kagan, The Fog
    Discerning Barack Obama’s foreign policy in any detail is far from easy. The great majority of his statements on the subject consist of criticism of the Bush administration… The constant lamentation over Bush’s mistakes, justified though it may be, leaves obscure what Obama thinks we should do now. A close examination of his pronouncements on foreign affairs nevertheless suggests the general outlines of his likely foreign policy. Like the Clinton administration, an Obama administration would set out determined to rely on diplomacy, backed where necessary by economic sanctions and, in some cases, limited and precise military strikes–the sole exception being Afghanistan, where Obama proposes an open-ended commitment of American troops to win on what he regards as the central front in the war on terror…

  44. Once again, an ethnic nationalist party has prevented a majority. Go Quebec, keep on being modern & inclusive.

  45. Alaskan glaciers grew last year.
    “On the Juneau Icefield, there was still 20 feet of new snow on the surface of the Taku Glacier in late July.”
    “It’s been a long time on most glaciers where they’ve actually had positive mass balance,” Molnia said.
    “That’s the way a scientist says the glaciers got thicker in the middle.”
    http://www.adn.com/news/environment/story/555283.html

  46. (Via SWJ) Usama Redha, Shiite cults seek to wreak havoc in Iraq
    The Shiite faithful believe that in the world’s darkest hour, Imam Mahdi will return and bring justice and calm. But where mainstream Shiite believers wait patiently for that day, groups such as the one that tried to enlist Iman are convinced that they can hasten his reappearance by spreading chaos.
    Devout Sunnis also believe in the Mahdi’s coming, but do not think it involves the Shiite imam…

  47. Hardboiled:
    For someone who appears to think you know more than the PM, the Conservative Party and the just re-elected government, I have a newsflash for you. You’re wrong.
    Your political naivete drowns out any points you may make, and your constant, strident pronounciations of superiority are tiresome.
    Your spelling is quite good .

Navigation