I mean, is this someone I should know?.
His so-called “child” soldier witnessed the destruction of 9/11. Thus, this so-called “Canadian” chose to fight at the side of foreign terrorists he knew were capable of mass murder. And after finding himself on the losing end of a firefight, this so-called “anxious innocent” watched his one, last “help me” opportunity come and go as he lay in the Afghan dirt.
Instead of grabbing it, he threw a grenade.
So, now he begs?
Omar Khadr deserved to be dispatched then and there. His father might have been dispatched by the Pakistanis, which would have spared everyone a great deal of trouble, were it not for the meddling of Chretien. We made that mistake once – we need not make it again.
So yes, Mr. Good – kill them all. Kill every last one of the wretched vermin and do it before they breed.
I hope he appreciates the traffic bump, whoever he is.
Update – Self described blogging behemoth Matt Good sent a total of 190 visitors to SDA as a result of his July 15th link. Woohoo! Why, that’s nearly 100 a day – bumping the traffic here by nearly 1%, or to look at it another way, by 1/5th the number who arrived at the page via Kathy Shaidle in six hours.
If there ever was a way to impress a backwoods xenophobe about the strength of your readership, I can’t think of a better one. Except perhaps, by mentioning the 70 times you’ve “crossed the country”. Hey, it’s a start!
Upperdate! – unable to prove his “my traffic is bigger than yours” claims, Mr. Good decided that deletion was the better part of valor. Not that it stopped him from whining. Nevermind that Mr. Ad Hominem Is Not Tolerated Here chose to fire the first shot with tired, stereotypical references to “backwoods” Canada that can only be described as abject bigotry. Like every good lefty elitist, Matthew Good’s “multiculturalism” doesn’t include yours.
P. Martini, what poppycock. Your “paper” would be returned, for dense and flippant verbiage, minus any attempt at chapter and verse. (Look that up if the term is unfamiliar.)
BTW, after digging into the pile of pretentious manure you produced, I see you’re quite wrong about the majority: both Charter jurisprudence and HRC travesties have made clear that the majority, versus minority groups, is considered altogether fair—and the main—game for discrimination and punishment in this country. That you’re quite ignorant of the facts of the matter in late 20th and 21st century Canada makes it clear that you’re out of your depth here.
I suggest you go back to the very shallow end of the blogoshere, where your false, knee-jerk assertions will be perceived as worthwhile. You can’t fool us here.
P. Martini: FYI, gophers are not endangered.
ET wrote:
I may be hapless, hopeless, empty, vapid, specious and ungrounded, but you’re too funny. I’m not going to explain to you how, conceptually, “majority” and “minority” relate to constitutional law or government. If it isn’t immediately obvious to you that there are majorities and minorities (e.g., those who stand accused of crimes, whom you cannot simply kill because you don’t like how they look at you) in democracies, no amount of explanation will resolve your problems understanding.
suggestion for stop the war among blogs:
I really like after war in middle east to get stop with real solution not monkey job today
the month of july is almost finish at the end of month of August we are watching
who is number 2 the most political blog in canada?
competition is good
who can talk more reason and explain problmes in canada and got respond better is go to rank
stop illegal competition and made ethic competition then
i got this from
http://ezralevant.com/2008/07/were-number-four.html
then later public tell each blogs good to focue in this problmes more or less to balance their job not keep repeating one story similar in all otehr blog with no value added to that
—
http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-july/
The picture above is of a Vancouver sunset. I’ll be departing my native town for Toronto this Saturday. Here are the July rankings for Canada’s Top 25 Political Blogs. For the explainer – click on the ‘Top 25 Blogs’ link above. I’ve changed the graphics – again – but I’ll stick to this style for the next year. Promise.Thanks to all the blogs that linked here in the last month – including most of the ones on this list, as well Hotair.com, SmallDeadAnimals.com, Steynian, Dr. Dawg (kinda), CanadianCynic, Webelf, Blazing Cat Fur, Five Feet of Fury, and Covenant Zone. The detailed list will be back late tonight tomorrow night. Need to fix it. My bad for not triple checking. The order of blogs is fine, but I forgot to update the Alexa numbers in this post. Here’s the precis:
1.SteynonLine.com
2.MatthewGood.com
3.Daimnation
4.EzraLevant.com
5.SmallDeadAnimals
6.Genxat40
7.CanadianCynic
8.AbandonedStuff
9.GarthTurnerUnedited
10.FiveFeetofFury
11.SteveJanke.com
12.GhostofaFlea
13.The Shotgun Blog
14.Bene Diction Blog
15.Big City Lib
16.Steynian
17.Red Tory
18.The Galloping Beaver
19.JayCurrie
20.DavidAkinontheHill
21.RightGirl
22.ActionDinosaur
23.AprilReign
24.WarrenKinsella
25.Dawg’sBlog
“Matthew Good is a well established Canadian artist. One of the finest since the 60’s and he deserves respect.”
That’s your opinion. Another more realistic opinion, based on his career trajectory, might be that he’s a miserable person and a failed singer/songwriter, who has morphed into a failed blogger, because of his vapid and irrational left wing rants.
This being the case, he deserves mocking, not respect.
Thanks, soccermom.
But I fear that “defendants with constitutional rights” may be a species which is endangered.
ET;
Well if your going to bring up the subject of critical thinking and “pompous empty words”, than I suggest you read some of the comments on this page and redirect that comment elsewhere.
All I’m saying is there is no need to slander someone based on false opinions and facts.
Oh and what the H does the lead singer from BNL have to do with anything anyways? Who’s critical thinking skills were lacking there?
As well as the past in regards to shoe throwing at Buffallo Days, yeah, us Reginians sure do know how to let go of the past, we also think that because someone is a musician that they don’t have anything of value to say, either. Well, applause to open-mindedness. I’m happy to say that Saskatchewan is lagging in moving forward…no wonder were one of the last provinces going forward.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Yourself included. I just think that if people are going to critique others viewpoints, they do so in ways that are tactful, factual, and tasteful. I like engaging in intelligent discourse, not intelligence that is the size of a mustard seed.
Small Dead Animals?
An apt description of the right-wing conservative movement. Sums it up nicely.
So once you drop the pathetic ad-hominem attacks on Mr. Good, perhaps you might consider debating him on say, The Hour, on the merits of the case.
LOL, idealogues like yourselfs always fail to see that your very own words are your worst enemies.
But you certainly are good for a laugh.
P. Martini, your response to ET is weasel words, pure and simple. You’re not giving chapter and verse, I suspect, because you don’t know the facts.
If I’m wrong, prove it: pretentious generalizations just don’t cut it. (Even kids in grade three know that they need to provide examples and explanations when expressing an opinion.)
And, lookout:
Charter rights may not be overridden by majority will. That’s the point of the Charter. Even if the defendants are “vermin” they have constitutional rights to a fair process to determine their guilt or innocence.
SDA wrote:
“So yes, Mr. Good – kill them all. Kill every last one of the wretched vermin and do it before they breed.”
You can’t do that. A criminal defendant may not be punished without constitutional due process. Your blogger’s suggestion is not only morally repugnant for me (maybe not for you, and that’s fine), but it’s clearly unconstitutional.
By the way, I’m not a liberal. I just like constitutions.
I agree with P. Martini while I am Muslim not like his name Martini remind me a alcholic drink
in Canadian some group come and lable you and when you defend they got more offensive with you
while by law you have right to defend yourself
if you Khadr if he is muslim and like to defend himself fro his right and amount guilt he has
becuse he is muslim must talk and act differnet
in some part of canada even if you defend yourself they hate more and put more people jump on you sudddenly
some people can not see black president for only anlyss his talk but also his colur or he may born outside of US or he may be Muslim Obma is issue for thwem more than to anlay is he smart enough to be presidnet or not
basiclaly this is call bulliness that if some one say opinoion otehr party must be open minded but suddnly they facing few people come and abusively not like to hear you at all because they are not really rspect free speech they only like they talk and when they see differnt view they hate it by their heart and start use abusive words to get them out
even in parlemena we have opposition to see different view nothing wrong with it and you cna not expect eveybody like you butyou can not cut all people who not like your view out of way
so many of htem are not know meaning of freedom border and limit of what they are talking about
tehy just hate the guy for any reason with no trail only becuase he is muslim
may be in future govment of canada stop bring any Muslim in canda and ask them in immigration pepare if you are Muslim do not come to canada because we hate you all and fire you all if you talk
I never went to Mathew good blogs before
it lack of simple but not attract audience to the blogs for some reason
we are racing who is best blogs in anlys problmes on Aug 2008 while none of you are muslim I do not care who is win or loose I just want people talk more make sense not emotional of talking Muslim in abulute guilty all them time
beccasteps- My comments about ‘pompous empty words’ are not ‘slander’. Kindly look up the meaning of the word.
They are conclusions based on reading P. Martini’s comments. What ‘false opinions and facts’ are you referring to? His post had no facts. And most certainly, I think that false opinions ought to be critiqued.
What lead singer? I certainly never mentioned one.
What shoe throwing? I never heard of such.
Again, kindly use correct words. Critiquing someone is NOT slander. Look up the word. And what the heck does a’tasteful’ critique look like?
Oh- and the metaphor of a mustard seed is old. And tasteless. If you want to insult someone, try again. Wait- didn’t you say that you didn’t want to engage in non-tactful, tasteless discourse?
P. Martini- no, you are going to have to provide factual data to substantiate your specious and empty words. You see, words that reference everything, such as ‘beauty’ or ‘goodness’ are called ‘universals’. And ‘universals’ are, in themselves, without meaning. You have to put them into a context. That includes flinging such terms around as ‘majority’ and ‘minority’. What do they mean in the context of this discussion?
The problem is – as others have pointed out as well – your vapid generalizions have no meaning. Provide some context; be specific; ground those generalities in particulars…And don’t fob off this task onto the reader. It’s up to you to make us understand what you mean.
Res, speak English, for crying out loud. As for the fellow travelers visiting the site: Go home; grow up.
“So once you drop the pathetic ad-hominem attacks on Mr. Good, perhaps you might consider debating him on say, The Hour, on the merits of the case.”
Mr Good is not interested in debating. I wrote a long reasoned rebuttal to his essay, which did not get published, as his comment’s are ‘moderated’. He is a typical deluded knee-jerk bleeding heart liberal who sees Omar Khadr the victim here instead of the dead US soldier. Moreover, he feels self-righteous and superior in his opinions, and therefore assumes the right to delete contrary points of view. Debate? What debate? The ethics are ‘settled’ !
P. Martini writes, “But I fear that ‘defendants with constitutional rights’ may be a species which is endangered”.
Hey, PM, I agree with you on that one! But do you have a clue what you’re talking about?
Essay assignment: With reference to Human Rights [sic] Commissions in Canada over the last two decades, explain how majorities in Canada (in your own words, ‘defendants with constitutional rights’) have been discriminated against without due process. With reference to at least ten specific cases, be sure to include details about the HRCs’ habitual lack of due process, as well as the draconian and potentially ruinous sanctions meted out to targeted, law abiding Canadians by unqualified adjudicators.
This thread will be up for a few more days, so you have plenty of time to comply.
I’m glad to see we’re in agreement on this one and am looking forward to your post!
“based on his career trajectory, might be that he’s a miserable person and a failed singer/songwriter, who has morphed into a failed blogger, because of his vapid and irrational left wing rants.”
So your entire critique of Matt Good’s position on this is an ad hominem attack?
Can’t argue the facts, so you attack the character of the person your pretending to debate.
Speaking of miserable, I believe you’re self-reflecting.
Your words betray you.
Hands up, how many SDA regulars have logged onto Matthew Good’s site to say “ZOMG!!!1!!11 Don’t be so mean to Kate. She’s da bomb!”
I hear crickets chirping. That many, eh?
It’s nice to know that Matthew has little girls that’ll come over here tell us how mean we are. I’m sure it makes him feel loved.
Defendants are a minority in Western. That’s why they have constitutionally-guaranteed rights. Your question makes no sense. Fundamental rights are not there to protect the majority which can protect itself by voting in a democratic system. The fundamental rights are there to protect the minorities, like defendants, like Khadr.
The rationalization for not allowing majorities to take away those rights is that history shows that minorities become majorities. Therefore, a majority at one time in history may not oppress a minority on certain basic rights (which are in the Charter and the US constitution Amendments 1-10 for example) any more than the former majority would suffer being oppressed by the former minority. I expect you will have some wise reply to this, because it is not simple, but your question really mistakes the basic concepts.
I’m not here to educate you on Western government. This will be my last post, as you have clearly demonstrated that you do not understand even the basic concepts.
I’ve just read P. Martini’s 5:07 post which responds to me: “And, lookout:
“Charter rights may not be overridden by majority will. That’s the point of the Charter. Even if the defendants are ‘vermin’ they have constitutional rights to a fair process to determine their guilt or innocence.” (Moot in the Khadr situation but . . .)
Great! PM does agree with me about constitutional rights—I’m sure even for the majority, if theirs are being denied—and will, I’m sure, look forward to a new, non parochial take on this viewpoint, which my essay assignment will provide.
(Actually, I won’t mind at all if [s]he submits a first draft: just like her/him, lots of us here are very concerned that “[e]ven if the defendants are ‘vermin’ they have constitutional rights to a fair process to determine their guilt or innocence”. If this person needs assistance in using the context of Canada’s HRCs and specific details to explain this principle, there are many here who’d be glad to give a hand at the editing stage.)
Happy researching and writing, P. Martini!
“Mr Good is not interested in debating”
That’s quite the assumption, have you asked, because I just did, and he’s game anytime you are.
So what do you say? Debate on?
Ethics? Please, it’s a blog, not a University classroom son. Reasoned? Um, I’ve read your posts here, this must be a new tactic for you. Was it anything like “He is a typical deluded knee-jerk bleeding heart liberal” or “he feels self-righteous and superior in his opinions, and therefore assumes the right…”
Yeah, you sound perfectly reasoned in your juvenile ad hominem attacks there. And speaking of assumptions, you seem to be chalk full of them.
Cry me a river, you were moderated. Boo-f*cking-hoo. Baby want a blanky?
LOL
Matthew Good: Born Loser
“For years the prospect of going to my parent’s place was a dreadful one…”
“…The point is that I had always felt uneasy going to their home.”
How is it that when one isn’t even comfortable with their place within their own family, they still feel (highly) qualified to preach to the rest of us about world affairs, international law, inter-personal relationships and moral self-righteousnes?
Such people are incapable of introspection.
P. Martini – if you are referring…A criminal defendant may not be punished without constitutional due process…to Khadr, a couple very relevant points: he’s an unlawful combatant charged with murder, captured on the battlefield in Afghanistan by US forces, consequently, he is NOT a US citizen covered under our Constituition. He isn’t entitled to our civilian courts. He has no habeas corpus rights which would be ridiculous as applied to the military. That hasn’t changed since WWII and before. We never tried Nazis in our civilian courts. That would have been ridiculous. Secondly, he is NOT entitled to GC rules either as he was acting as stateless terrorist without an identifying uniform. Makes sense to me. When you try to blend in with civilians as a ploy you lose the protection of the GC. Any of this make sense to you so far?
My post at 11:52 reviews his crimes and his victim. It might be worth that little effort on your part to get there and view some facts.
He will be tried in October. Personally, he ought to be shot if found guilty. Re-read his crime. In many cultures 15 year olds are fathers, married and in the work force. At 15 one certainly understands warfare, murder and consequences. The terrorists recruit in and below that age group. They don’t get a pass when they are doing diabolical things.
So, that’s the topic, but, maybe that’s not what you and Good’s disciples drifted over to debate. So, go for it.
NOGUFF
Cherry picking anyone? You missed a few words, so I thought I’d give the reader a complete picture, to clear things up and of course, correct you
“For years the prospect of going to my parent’s place was a dreadful one. When I was married my ex-wife was never fond of the idea, often planting ideas in my head that all my family wanted was money for something.”
See the difference a few words can make
So, you were saying?
Mr. Martini (and others from Good’s blog)- this is a large site, so I’ll forgive you for your inattention. Unlike Matthew Good, I offer my readers my sitemeter stats publicly. While it’s not perfect (it undercounts by about 20 – 30%), it will indicate that the average weekday here, in the low-point of summer, generates about 10,000 visits. Mr. Good’s linkage went completely unregistered. Don’t take my word for it –
http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s17smalldeadanimals&r=5
Also, on the left side of the blog, is the SDA reader occupation survey. I suggest you read it.
Your bigotry in assuming that because I am from Saskatchewan, that this blog is read by undereducated rural prairie backwoods bumpkins is about to receive a rude rebuttal.
You are quite frankly, a complete and utter idiot, as is Mr. Good.
While a fan of Matt’s music, I find his blog harder and harder to stomach as the years go by.
I don’t think personal attacks are necessary and I don’t think most people that have posted in this thread have an accurate picture of who he is, he is not your average musician. Groupies and drug abuse are not his thing, more like tea and reading. He is intelligent and articulate, but I happen to disagree strongly with a fair bit of what he writes.
minority and majority is all depend on what topic and subject we are talking about
in North America ( Canada and USA ) in total of Muslim live they are only may 10 million population in total I bleive we have or may 800 million to 1 billion in north AMerica
population of Muslim is like 1% here
then Muslim are minority
in world of more than 5 bilion and Muslim poluation of 1 billion we are 1/5 of population afer chrisitinay are second highest number third are hindu or Budism
in Muslim country like Afganstina and middle east the population ofMuslim are 95%
now it is sometime you go to France and you talk Englihs and nobody know what you are talking about or my case is live example
communication sometimes lost in eco and back to you and nobody hear it correctly
while some people think minority are give more constitution law for them in most case nobdy help them again in constitution and judge again those people who are Muslim are refused to give right to miniroty too teh exampel is why Khadr trial take so long it proof justice sysme even hrc is not value real huamn right only human right they like not to internationla human right as well
plus in canada the people are not used to hear otehr opionion they act so bad abusive if some one say differnt too even cut the talk to not even hear it what we are talking about
and even if some white english are not l ike thei idea as you can see both blogs ar talk togethe are also not welcome their view
again Methew good can say his opion but the way he startt to talke about SDA is more to sachwan or they are more villagi or small place or they are woman talk also not polite way to referce his opion as well in fairness of judging him he could talk his opion not necessary to abuse teh locatio of sda where they come form was relvent to issue of Khader in general but on otehr hand the small place like country side and sakstwan and New browick are not facing so many minority not like them nd not like multiculture in general I think becuase they are not see them and not welcome them may be
some times you must yield two times and talk so much to hear you out loud they may pay attention this area is also changing in future we hope
The Hour?
Could it be that we have a generation of youngsters who think this is the epitome of intellectual discourse in this country?
Lyrics from the Matt Good song I cited much earlier:
Flashdance II
She was a dancer I was out work
She had a law degree, I used to be a clerk
She takes her clothes off for the Japanese
I take my clothes off whenever it suits me
Barely living, but I’m living large
Well it ain’t the ending that I fear
So lets go downtown
And walk around til you feel like the walls are caving in
You could sail beside the world tonight
They were taken, and they would ruin you
You could sell us every words tonight
She had a name like April Spring
But her mother called her Judy
She takes her clothes off for the Japanese
She says they’re nicer than most would be
Barely living, but we’re living large
Well ain’t the middle that I fear
Put in the ground
And wait arund til you feel like the walls are caving in
you could sail beside the world tonight
And they were taken
And they would ruin you
Well her hate is still prettier in person
Prettier than words now, prettier than, prettier than me
You could sail beside the world tonight
You’re turning into the biggest it all gets
And my head is so light
You’re turning into the biggest it all gets
And my head is so light, so, so light
You could sail beside the world tonight
And they were taken, and they would ruin you
Well her hate is prettier in person
Prettier than words now, prettier than me…
Penny:
We can agree to disagree. I was originally making a general characterization of this blog. I was inspired principally by the original post which argued that Khadr should be killed. I may not object to the penalty, but I do find it tasteless in general and degrading to our system of law (and ultimately unhelpful in protecting our way of life) to spout such venom without qualifying it by recognizing that the penalty, if it is applied, will have been applied fairly and consistent with the law. The original post played more to xenophobia than reason and objectivity.
As far as habeas corpus, you might have to update yourself or explain to me why the decision doesn’t matter, if you are better informed than I am (I won’t be checking back): Boumediene v. Bush
And, there is no shortage of disagreement on the application of the Geneva Convention either.
I see the Retard Brigade showed up. Hi, retards!
Just so we are all clear about Wee Omar’s rights here:
-he was captured in Afghanistan where he is not a citizen,
-by the Americans,
-in a war,
-after killing an American soldier under a false flag of surrender,
-and he’s not a soldier for any country.
Add that up, he has no rights. He pissed them away. The Americans have no compelling reason not to send his little self back to Afghanistan and let the Afghans deal with him. After all, its their country he was doing war against, they should get a crack at him don’t you think?
Or would you rather he be repatriated and released in Toronto because he’s under age, and go to school with YOUR kid? Hmmn? Same classroom with Johnny and Janie Average in Etobicoke?
Sounds great! Good plan, lets write those letters!
I’m starting to wonder if P. Martini is Matthew Good’s ghostwriter.
I’m going back to read the 12 screen rebuttal to Kate to look for similarities in style.
Just for the record. No.
“It simply questions every moderation we have created in our society. It questions “the deal” we have struck with each other as citizens…,”
This pretty much describes the moral relativity of the left. No right or wrong. No absolutes of morality.
Just ‘root causes’,’social responsibilities’ and a thousand and one other excuses for anti-social and criminal behaviors.
“Matthew Good has written songs about our degenerating culture, especially here in North America.”
Written about? Hell, he embodies our degenerating culture. No need to embellish or reinforce it by ‘writing’ about it.
I think that Matt Good is a very talented person. And i also believe that in Canada we should be allowed to speak our minds and not be attacked verbally. Matt is a wominizer. He is perverted. He did get screwed in a divorce. He likes to lure women on the internet. It does not make him any less of a canadian citizen. Just because you don’t agree on some of his comments, does not make you look like the better person by verbally attacking him.
He made a valid point, Kate you made a valid point. Be done with it!
This is such a waste of everyone’s energy and time.
Focus it on something useful, instead of typing DO SOMETHING. You are all jsut as guilty, and if typing makes you feel better about the world then that’s your vice.
With friends like Becki…
Is this wedding party for Matthew Good &
SDA to solve their views
With friends like becki what?????????????????
Expalin
Liz J: “Being in a well established music group doesn’t give license to deal in or take illicit drugs. He’ll have to explain this one, deal with his fellow band members as well, he’s let them down.
Perhaps his friends on the political Left which he supports will say he was set-up and jump to his defense.”
Excuse me? Did you just spew out the first thing that came to your mind? Perhaps something that you feel strongly about? Or did you get sidetracked by the news about BNL which Matt Good and his blog have NOTHING to do with?
The reason why you have actual fans of Matt Good coming to this site to “flame” is due to the writer of this blog discrediting Mr. Good for no apparent reason. Whether you like his music or his political views or not, Matt did not attack “smalldeadanimals”. I believe this blog was simply referenced in his and you all jumped the gun and decided to be cheeky and ask “Who is Matt Good?”. I strongly believe that if the writer of this blog had simply decided to say “According to Matthew Good…” and reference in proper fashion that you would not have the online firefight between blogs that is currently occuring.
Exactly what he said
P Martini – I think Kate’s post was more general that “killing” Khadr. She linked her “kill them all” statement to the wikipedia page on Al Qaeda. I can’t agree more.
“Killing” Khadr is really a silly and inflammatory way of framing the issues here. Let me ask you a question, every night somewhere with their night scopes US and Canadian soldiers most assuredly spot teenage terrorists setting up IED’s on the roads to maim and murder, do you think before they pull the trigger that they should do an age check? Can Israelis shoot a 12 year old with a suicide belt lunging toward a school?
Habeas corpus in a civilian trial is basically show us the body or the preponderance of circumstantial evidence that there is one, it makes sense until you put that in a warfare paradigm on a battlefield. Does that make sense to you?
Out of curiosity, how old are you? Just to get a sense of where you are coming from.
Now your attacking his lyrics, from a B-side single, that was released as a throw-away to make his record company happy.
LOL, desperate much?
BTW, how many awards has this blog been nominated for?
We need to call firefighters to come to scene!
we can clap now becaue more topic of muslim is not any more top issue in blogs now the story is change this is exactly we try to say when they arrest the khadr story chnage from major evidence agains him to minor evidenc he is muslim still all evidnce afte all long time can be change who can trust after sep 11 the evidence againt Khadr is not made up story too!
figt among blogs is more fun to watch and entertain too Muslim and Khadr is now watching you all he still teenger and young may learn from you in west socity how to never fight ever again! really
Kathy Sheidle previous candidiate for presidency of USA is always is peas to all soap to stir
Kate writes:
“You are quite frankly, a complete and utter idiot, as is Mr. Good.”
^Case in point. While Matthew Good maintains his integrity by not using childish fodder to defend himself, Kate decides to defend her blog and all of her province by sticking out her tongue and saying “nanananabooboo!”
“Cherry picking anyone? You missed a few words, so I thought I’d give the reader a complete picture, to clear things up and of course, correct you”
“For years the prospect of going to my parent’s place was a dreadful one. When I was married my ex-wife was never fond of the idea, often planting ideas in my head that all my family wanted was money for something.”
Oh, that’s better. Obviously I misunderstood Mr. Good. So he’s not a child-like narcissist with poor inter-personal skills and who is easily manipulated by others.
I’m relieved.
Like I said before…
Who is Matthew Good?
ET:
WOW
I was citing examples from other commentators. Not you yourself. Guess you didn’t look at what anyone else wrote from your own team. Funny that you assume I would only ATTACK you yourself. And why would I need to use a dictionary when nothing you initially said is found in a dictionary, unless I’m supposed to be psychic and read between the lines of everything you say. Sorry, I have much better things to do with my time.
Again I say WOW.
The mustard seed example was the only tasteful thing I could think of using considering other commentators lack of consideration.
As for critiquing and everything else you brought up in a futile attempt to discredit my opinion, I could care less, I just came to this site to see what it was all about and whether or not Mr. Good’s opinion of your site was valid…and I wasn’t missing out on anything.
Have a super great day!
O.K. Penny, I’ve checked back because you have acted reasonably in disagreeing with me, and I thank you for so doing. I don’t mind being disagreed with.
I never made any point about the age. I didn’t say I would object to that penalty.
I know what habeas corpus is. Apparently it applies to the detainees. Let’s not get into the Geneva Convention because that is no less contentious. As long as the US is holding people like Khadr in Cuba (without any protection or criminal charge which, now, law requires and, again, setting aside arguments on the Geneva Convention on their detention and torture), advocating that they “all” be killed summarily and linking to a class of people (al Qaeda) which they have not been charged formally to be, is quite troubling. Can I not object to THAT? THAT is what I objected to WAY back in my first post.
with friends like becki…..
Who needs a pet fish?
Why wake up in the morning?
Makes the age old argument of chicken or the egg seem like doctoral dissertation?
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/smalldeadanimals.com+matthewgood.org/?metric=uv
Kate seems to be ahead.
I went and I saw Methew Good site and I saw he start writing about SDA
and SDA get sensitive when Methew Good wrote aobut him then it proof while you are bloger also not happy if some one write something you may sound not true about you and like to defned your side
this exactly when you wrote about Muslim they angry and like to say teh view is wrong too
how we can anlsis who can wrote aobut other person and how to say to get the credicts without get angry you do not need to say your view with insulting each other but this is happbit they learn from socity in Canada they are good unles they are not talk about hem as soon as some one said about them tehy can not handle it while they are daily talk about others may right or wrong as well
if you pulling the strings say I am the best and otehr say I am the best that is up to public saying who is the best and waht you write about yourself is based on your conscience and morality too
it means some people may right about some issue not all the issue they say is true or correct
if you are a boss and you have people below you are not know how do you order and direct socity by put dow people who not know or by kindly point point to listen to your view
Good is more artisit and more to heart and SDA is more policitic and see it by different views
eyes can see the same thing different and anlysis two views over it
I have nothing else to say to this topicss any more do not fight who is the bes blog to bring recent news explain good and bad opinion and negetive and positive view over every thing
While Everyone is entitled to their own opinion However, you may want to research what someone is all about before you start what simply seems like name calling. I am certain that you may be an intelligent writer but Matt Good is entitled to his opinion as are you to yours but ensure they are well informed before post something about the guy you are trying to insult.
While Everyone is entitled to their own opinion However, you may want to research what someone is all about before you start what simply seems like name calling. I am certain that you may be an intelligent writer but Matt Good is entitled to his opinion as are you to yours but ensure they are well informed before post something about the guy you are trying to insult.