Safe and Effective®

Safe and Effective Wuhan Flu 34 Comments

Grab a beverage.

Sheldon Yakiwchuk- Boosters – Criminally Negligent Homicide or Pre-Meditated Murder?

But of course, we already knew that the vaccines couldn’t stop COVID transmission…and yet we still persisted with the Vaccine Mandates on Travel, Employment, Employment Insurance and Leaving Canada…because, “SCIENCE”.

What we are seeing now is that the Hospitalizations, in a time when mortality was historically less than half of what it is currently, is in our Boosted Communities. It has been a persistent trend, mentioned in previous substacks where as of the most recent Data from May 16th, 2022, the boosted now make up more than 50% of the Current Hospitalizations, in a period where Vaccinated from one dose to 3 make up 81% of the current hospitalizations.

Links in this piece are also worthwhile. Particularly, this one. 

34 Replies to “Safe and Effective®”

  1. I have my 2 in order to work and get into anything where a vax pass was required. I am NOT getting any more. I know many people now with boosters that had Covid. I have not.

  3. More scientifically inept trash from The Darwin Awardee Association. By all means, keep eliminating yourselves. The great benefits of self-deletion like this are one of the biggest reasons I oppose vaccine mandates.

    1. UK vaccine surveillance data shows the same trend as Alberta. The boosted are being killed off. The UK vaccine surveillance data reports showed the age group and vax status of the deaths and hospitalizations….that is up until Week 13 of 2022, when they stopped. And they stopped simply because the data was clearly showing the disaster of the “boosters”. The last report showing that breakdown showed that 89.55% of the COVID deaths that week were in the “vaccinated”. That percentage is far higher than the percent of the population that is vaccinated. And 73% of all the COVID deaths in that period were in the triple vaxxed. It is the elderly that have been boosted that are being killed off.

    2. “ More scientifically inept trash from The Darwin Awardee Association. By all means, keep eliminating yourselves. The great benefits of self-deletion like this are one of the biggest reasons I oppose vaccine mandates.”

      Your diatribe is nonsensical given the very low IFR. Your Misanthropy is LULZy

  4. “Follow the science”.
    Like other fallacies a term shortened to make something seem acceptable.
    The full.
    Follow the political science (fiction).

  5. I really hate it when yesterdays Conspiracy Theories become todays Spoiler Alerts. All the people who opposed the Vax mandates and theorized on the bad outcomes that could occur probably feel vindicated but depressed. The bad news is that the Gov’t is still pushing them and the Turd is under contract to take delivery of millions more mRNA shots, and is even building a Moderna plant in the nation of Quebec so this will continue until 2025, thanks to Hazmat Singh and his merry NDPers. Maybe this is Bill Gates longed for depopulation event after all, just in really, really slow motion. It has two benefits, it sorts out the gullible (the jabbers) and identifies the resistance in one fell swoop.

  6. I am thinking there are a lot more cases these days, which might well increase the mortality overall. This being the case, the vaccinations have certainly caused increased spread by allowing for folks to mingle again, travel, etc.
    I do hope that’s the case, rather than vaccinations themselves damaging immune systems. I am not vaxxed but unlike unme, the debate has not made me bitter enough to wish calamity on those who don’t see things my way

    1. This whole episode has brought out the worst in people. People’s inner fascist was always a hop skip and a jump away. Chiefly from those who abuse the term the most.

  8. If this was ever about health, Justin would have handled this all very differently.

    If we are still confused, it’s about control.

    Now, when is the next convoy?

  9. I for one do not buy this,was accidental.

    Pure hogwash, given mRNA jabs have been around since the early 90’s….at which time, Animal testing showed perfectly well this shit was useless (in that it killed them All).

  10. I am against the vaccines, and I am not vaxed. I have serious doubts about their effectiveness and safety. Unfortunately, my background is in statistics and this article is full of false presumptions and conclusions that cannot be determined from the data.

    There is the reason medical and scientific investigations have randomized samples and control groups. In Canada (and I suspect most places), it is the elderly and vulnerable that are rushing to get vaccines and boosters, so then we look at the data and see that these people are hospitalized in the highest numbers. Could be the boosters, but I mostly suspect its because the vulnerable are mostly boosted.

    1. The evidence he presents raises common sense questions and quite possibly falsifies the ‘effectiveness and safety’ claims made of the vaccines. You, as a statistician, have an opportunity to put up your evidence rather than deflect his article with your weak statements (full of false presumptions and conclusions). I do not buy your argument one bit; prove your statements to us or go away. Having spent almost 3 decades in academia, I have found that there is so much analysis manipulation of data and junk science out there in the public domain to not trust anything that ‘government scientists’ and ‘academics’ say and do today.

      1. Your 3 decades of academia have clearly damaged your ability to recognize a coherent argument. Correlation is not causation, no matter how much Yakiwchuk uses ALL CAPS; and since neither the fatalities/ICU admissions nor the vaccinations are evenly distributed random samples they can’t be compared. Don said as much. Yakiwchuk’s arguments don’t rise above the level of statistical noise.

        1. Yawn, show us some analysis to prove your point. Too many IYIs out there these days.

      2. I am not putting up any points or analysis. I am saying that with out control groups using random samples, any conclusions, even my own, are not valid. I completely distrust the incompetent government “experts” and the politicians. But just because I think they are full of sh*t doesn’t mean I can change the way valid research conclusions are formulated.

    2. Okay fellow statistician. Explain to me why the provinces choose to convert all deaths and illnesses in the vaccinated days 1-14 (1-21 in BC and Sask) automatically into COVID in the unvaccinated and what that would do to the numbers of death in unvaccinated and the ability to detect adverse reactions to the vaccine occurring in days 1-14 (1-21 in Sask in BC). That is not an assumption. That is what they are doing.

      To my statistician’s eye they are hiding adverse reactions and raising the death rates in the unvaccinated to make themselves look good and hide the dangers in the vaccine. I’d love to hear your take in it.

      1. They might be hiding much of their bullish*t, but that doesn’t allow us to make conclusions that don’t involve random samples and control groups. Hopefully we can both agree on that elemental principal in objective research.

  11. Just got off the porch roof. Ladder on on staging plank, on roof brackets. Needed to replace trim at peak above Gable vent. I’m 65. Can’t hire a identifies as male kid. Most won’t climb a ladder, let alone get on a roof, let alone a ladder on a roof. Don’t ask about reading a tape.

    Anyways most everyone my age is a couch slug. The 80 year olds I see are so weak, frail, shuffle gated. Watch TV 15 hrs a day, day after day.
    HG Wells wrote about Elois. Google it.
    We live such clean, aseptic lives that our immune systems are as flabby as the underside of a 80 year olds arm.
    Tomorrow I got to take the truck tire off and switch out the lower ball joint. I’ve scarfed a bunch of cardboard to pad out the nobby asphalt.
    While I was on the ladder I was thinking of writing a Machivelli, The Prince, only mix it up with Hillary Clinton’s career. I’ve done carpentry so long I tend to day dream.

    Funny how gov/them didn’t want a no shot control population. And wanted to seal the records for 75 years.

  13. An effective vaccine wouldn’t have such a high infection rate, hospitalization rate or death rate in the weeks following the injection. Something is going awry in the immune system after the injection. An effective vaccine also wouldn’t have such a short duration of protection, be leaky and not work on variants. It is not a good vaccine.

    More worrying is the increase in all cause mortality in the under 50 age groups after vaccination. There’s more deaths and hospitalizations in the vaccination year of 2021 than the pre vaccination year of 2020. Particularly hard hit are young men and boys. It’s a big red flag indicating that the vaccine is not safe.

    1. And in Manitoba anything that happens after 28 days from the last jab is automatically considered unrelated. So between converting anyone days 1-14 into COVID in the unvaccinated and anyone over 28 days into unrelated, there is basically 14 days when you can have an adverse reaction that government will recognise.

      What a great way to prove the vaccines are safe and effective!

      1. Nails it.

        And, I agree with your earlier post about the bastards hiding adverse reactions by screwing with cutoff dates.

  14. It’s not a vaccine, they’re still doing clinical trials although those seem to be mere fluff instead of actual trials? My husband had two shots, they nearly killed him, I haven’t had any shots and we’ve both had covid. Was covid bad, oh yea I’ve never been that sick in my life but I survived the Covid and so did hubby. My elderly neighbor has covid, she is rather frail but she survived covid. I know more people who have gotten sick since their boosters than the beginning of the pandemic where I knew no one sick with it. Good thing big pharma and world governments and the media are such good buds-won’t stop the class action suits coming down the pike against all those involved for approving the non-vaccines and forcing mandates.

  15. Slightly off topic but related…

    My mother has been in long-term care for the last 3 years and last week she tested positive even though she was asymptomatic. Like most people in a LTC facility, she has received the vaccine and every booster. Every employee in the facility wears a mask and has been vaxxed. My brother and his wife who are Mom’s primary care-givers have had every shot and wear gowns and masks when they visit. Plus, non-vaxxed people have not been allowed to visit.

    SO…where did my mother contract the virus?
    Also, how often are residents in LTC facilities being tested and why?

    1. Those tests are not reliable. If she does not have symptoms, just wait and have her tested again.

  16. I am seeing a lot of back and forth over stats, how about the more obvious question? Why is it even debatable? If the vaxxes were much good at all, there would be no debate as it should be virtually all hospitalizations, ICU cases and deaths among the unvaxxed. If they were much good at all, you wouldn’t have to keep getting more and more shots. The fact that you have to analyze data nine ways from Sunday to find much if any benefit should be the end of the story. Couple this with the VAERS and European adverse events reports, the vaxxes are too dangerous for any marginal benefit they MAY have, if one can be found.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation