Beware the UN’s Copenhagen plot
[T]here are 181 pages that make up the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change dated September 15, 2009: a rough draft of what could be signed in Copenhagen. And yet, not one member of the media or political class has bothered to inform us about its contents as an important clue to what may happen in Copenhagen. The shame of that state of affairs started to trickle in last week.
Emails started arriving telling me about a speech given by Christopher Monckton, a former adviser to Margaret Thatcher, at Bethel University in St Paul, Minnesota, on October 14. Monckton talked about something that no one has talked about in the lead-up to Copenhagen: the text of the draft Copenhagen treaty.
[…]
So I read the draft treaty. The word government appears on page 18. Monckton says: “This is the first time I’ve ever seen any transnational treaty referring to a new body to be set up under that treaty as a government. But it’s the powers that are going to be given to this entirely unelected government that are so frightening.”
Monckton became aware of the extraordinary powers to be vested in this new world government only when a friend of his found an obscure UN website and hacked his way through several layers of complications before coming across a document that isn’t even called the draft treaty. It’s called a “note by the secretariat”. The moment he saw it, he went public and said: “Look, this is an outrage … they have kept the sheer scope of this treaty quiet.”
Monckton says the aim of this new government is to have power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and environmental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty.
You can hear Monckton speak to the ramifications of this treaty on Youtube.
Anthony Watts has highlighted other passages, among them;
17. [[Developed [and developing] countries] [Developed and developing country Parties] [All Parties] [shall] [should]:]
(a) Compensate for damage to the LDCs’ economy and also compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity, as many will become environmental refugees;
(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably compensated for environmental, social and economic losses arising from the implementation of response measures.
The full text of the Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty Draft (pdf) for your weekend reading pleasure.
You might call up your MP’s, and ask if they’ve read it.
Update – Youtube is up with Monckton on Glenn Beck today 6 part series
Monckton is on Beck today . . . .
I hope Jim Prentice or one of his aides reads SDA.
Monckton amd Beck have been mentioning the Maurice Strong One World Gov’t thing lately. I believe it is the reason for the whole GW Kyoto scam.
Over the passed few years I have had lots and lots of email exchanges with many prominent Canadian Journalists. I am thankful for them taking time to responded.
Although they often did respond, nothing but nothing guaranteed their silence more than my mentioning Maurice Strong.
They say there is a reason for everything – so what the he!! is it !?
Copenhagen is the fulfillment of Chairman Mo’s machinations. It has nothing to do with “saving” the planet. It is all about controlling the planet and destroying any semblance of liberty and freedom. The main target, of course, is the United States. Unfortunately, the beacon of liberty in the world is currently being led by a compliant stooge all too willing sell his own country out for the enrichment of Chairman Mo and Boss Soros
Page 16
“32. The difference between the assigned amounts of Annex I Parties and their actual GHG emissions
shall be quantified [as an increase in their emissions debt/accumulated per capita issions/use beyond their equitable allocation of the global atmospheric resources] [and shall provide the basis of] [as an input for the consideration of] fulfillment by Annex I Parties of their commitments to provide financing, technology and compensation to developing countries for mitigating and adapting to climate change.”
Translated into simple English:
“you stupid developed countries must send us third world banana republics really really buckets of money”
“Now, we call it Climate Justice. Before, we called it blackmail”
The copenhagen agreement has zero chance of passing. thus the nefariousness of its text will have nil effect.
Fortunately the Prime Minister’s Office is currently occupied by someone other than a Liberal.
It may be enough. We shall see.
I’m really pleased to see this post on SDA. I hope it gets a lot of attention and that it is indeed read by Prentice and his aides, and by Prime Minister Harper and his aides as well. Even better would be if PM Harper could find an hour of time to meet with Lord Christopher Monckton, who has expressed respect for and confidence in Mr. Harper to a much greater extent than any other western leader.
Fred, thanks for mentioning that. I’ll make a special point of watching Beck this afternoon.
Gord Tulk, I admit I haven’t been getting my head around the political machinations underlying the upcoming Copenhagen debacle. So, I’m curious, on what basis do you conclude it is destined for failure? I do hope you’re correct.
as I have posted before…
send them what??
green chits??
which can/will not be allowed to be used for money??
same with loons..
[ 14. Annex I Parties collectively, whether or not Parties to the Kyoto Protocol, must reduce their
emissions by at least 45 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020 and by more than 95 per cent below their
1990 levels by 2050.]
Which means we all go back to the late 1800s !! All, except the Kult leaders, that is.
All in the name of starving the earth’s plants. There is no No NO benefit to lower co2 concentrations. There is Is IS mega downside to lower co2 conc.
Optimum plant growth and food production occurs between 1200 ppm and 1500 ppm.
Below 200ppm plants stop growing and WE all die also.
So what the he!! is wrong with today’s 380ppm ??
Especially when we KNOW adding more co2 has virtually no more GW effect. And we know the only tipper in his tipping-point is his wife 🙂
CO2 concs have been much higher in the past and the earth did not burn up.
Colin: the plain fact is that the key players – most notably the US – but also Russia, china and India have no interest in it passing. While Obama can say he is in favour of it as he is in favour of cap and trade, the US senate will have none of it. A potus has no power to enter into treaties without the senates okay. Without the US much of the rest of the world will not sign (our prime minister has said as much). Hence Copenhagen has been hopeless for quite sometime now. And thus the drafters gave largely been the radicals as those with real power couldn’t be bothered. The result is an almost comical document that will collect dust.
Dr Evil over in China has ordered the Canadian MSM to get Boob in at all costs. Canada, for the first time in 40 plus years is NOT being run to the benifit of a certian cabal of scum and it is driving Dr Evil crazy. Boob Ray will institute all the dirty things to get this great scam through our parliment, like signing into law that co2 is a poisnous gas, go tell the plant life that Paul Martin you moron. This is serious business people, your children and grand children will be nothing but a slave to the state if this lunacy is not stopped. Harper check your balls, if you need to strap on a set, well do it, this is insanity that this scam got this far, when the people behind it are too stupid to even know Col Sanders is dead, when he shows up at their door. Nuts are now running the show.
I especially like the part where they exclude Nuclear power and Hydro-electric power as a viable means to reduse emissions.
Another paragraph states that in cases of climate emergencies, action has to be taken without waiting for scientific proof. It is an emergency after all.
Absolute garbage from start to finish.
On the bright side, I may have found a non medicinal cure for low blood pressure.
Yeah, come on Steve, don’t you want me to vote for you again?
Reminds me of a convo I had with a bunch of Evangelicals on campus twenty years back. It was in the context of Biblical prophecy and the so-called end times.
I chuckled when they said a one world government would form led by the EU to oppose Israel in the last days. I laughed at them. They also told me unless I bore the mark of the beast, I would not be able to buy and sell anything in the last days. If that were true, then how in the world could you get all us heathens to sign on to such an obvious scheme?
I suppose I won’t be laughing if the beast demands we submit to personal carbon tracking. In the New Religion, a bag of gold won’t be enough to buy a loaf of bread, will it?
Things that make you go hmmm…
Yeah, come on Steve, don’t you want me to vote for you again?
Sorry about the double post
Got a typepad error message and clicked again
“…..only he is lost,who gives himself up for lost.”
“Anyone who thinks he is too small to make a difference has never spent a night in a closed bedroom with a mosquito.”
“How we burned in the prison camps later thinking:
what would things have been like if every (soviet) police operative,
when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive?”
…if during periods of mass arrests people had not simply sat there in their lairs (apartments),
paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase,
but had understood they had nothing to lose and had boldly
set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes,
hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? …the organs (police)
would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers
…and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst,
the cursed (Communist government) machine would have ground to a halt.”
“seditionist” Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Prize winner,
who spent 11 years in communist concentration camps.
Gord, thanks for the analysis. I am going to do some of my own research over the weekend, but your comments give me a good starting point. Cheers!
It will be interesting to see what BO does. I predict he will not sign the accord, or he’ll sign a watered down one. Even BO understands the political and economic consequences.
As I’ve said, I’m depending on the greed and lack of philanthropy typically demonstrated by the left to prevail in this case. I just can’t see BO and the socialists handing out a piece of their pie.
Hello Mr. Prime Minister, (Harper)
I am writing to you about the Copenhagen climate Treaty. I am very concerned that this treaty will place a burden on myself and my children that we will be unable and unwilling to bear. I am not willing to
transfer my country’s wealth to some third world country, possibly Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, or Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe. Or any other country. Paying for injured dignity? I think not. I trust that our environment will be policed locally. As
we see fit. I think your government has done a stellar job running our country, better than any other in my lifetime, but I am nervous that the environmental zealots are pushing your government in a wobbelly direction. Please do not sign on to the Copenhagen Climate Treaty. I have taken the liberty of including a post from smalldeadanimals.com by way of cut and paste. I trust you are already aware of all this but to be sure, please read. Kyoto Treaty was wrong so is this Treaty.
Thanks, ****** * ******
Y2Kyoto: World Government, Climate Debt, And Enforcement
Beware the UN’s Copenhagen plot
[T]here are 181 pages that make up the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change dated September 15, 2009: a rough draft of what could be signed in Copenhagen. And yet, not one member of the media or political class has bothered to inform us about its contents as an important clue to what may happen in Copenhagen. The shame of that state of affairs started to trickle in last week.
Emails started arriving telling me about a speech given by Christopher Monckton, a former adviser to Margaret Thatcher, at Bethel University in St Paul, Minnesota, on October 14. Monckton talked about something that no one has talked about in the lead-up to Copenhagen: the text of the draft Copenhagen treaty.
[…]
So I read the draft treaty. The word government appears on page 18. Monckton says: “This is the first time I’ve ever seen any transnational treaty referring to a new body to be set up under that treaty as a government. But it’s the powers that are going to be given to this entirely unelected government that are so frightening.”
Monckton became aware of the extraordinary powers to be vested in this new world government only when a friend of his found an obscure UN website and hacked his way through several layers of complications before coming across a document that isn’t even called the draft treaty. It’s called a “note by the secretariat”. The moment he saw it, he went public and said: “Look, this is an outrage … they have kept the sheer scope of this treaty quiet.”
Monckton says the aim of this new government is to have power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and environmental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty.
You can hear Monckton speak to the ramifications of this treaty on Youtube.
Anthony Watts has highlighted other passages, among them;
17. [[Developed [and developing] countries] [Developed and developing country Parties] [All Parties] [shall] [should]:]
(a) Compensate for damage to the LDCs’ economy and also compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity, as many will become environmental refugees;
(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably compensated for environmental, social and economic losses arising from the implementation of response measures.
The full text of the Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty Draft (pdf) for your weekend reading pleasure.
You might call up your MP’s, and ask if they’ve read it.
P 18 as well : “Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, the
precautionary principle dictates that lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing measures.”
I think the reason for the elites’ scilence is that most of themsleves see the world government as an amazing career opportunity.
I forgot to add, this is what I sent off to the Prime minister.
pm@pm.gov.ca
Are there any charges Mao Stlong could be extradited to Canada on? Isn’t that man a bit too much?
“whether you like it or no”
well considering Buroke Obuma has already broken U.S. sovereignty law by joining that UN court thing he is very unlikely to be convinced into not signing onto “that dreadful treaty”, his goose is already cooked, waiting to be served.
bye bye miss American pie
glad your overwith anyway
were on airplane now and who’s are captain?
Kate?
What’s the Pope doing doing these days anyway?
Can he fly a runaway airplane?
Or is this just a hand basket?
If you want to see REAL pollution that is right in Chairman Mo`s back yard Google Chinahush.com and scroll down to Oct 21… Amazing Pictures, Pollution In China.
This is NOT co2!!
And they are concerned about co2…a fertilizer??
My letter to the PM:
Dear Mr. Prime Minister,
I am sending this email in response to a posting at http://www.smalldeadanimals.com. Earlier today, Kate posted a link to the Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty Draft. I took the opportunity to briefly scan the document and what I read was very disturbing. I am sure I don’t have to inform you of details regarding the content of this document, but I would like to take this opportunity to express my concerns with the document.
Firstly, I have great concerns that this document, by identifying Canada as a developed country, makes us responsible for reducing our own emissions while helping other countries become developed. The document goes to the extent to label us as in debt to the world because of our previous emissions as a developed country. As a result of this, Canada’s economy will toil under mandated emissions control while we are expected to siphon money out of our economy to help less developed countries. I have no doubt that there will be many countries falling under the “developing” criteria, and these counties will have a say in how much money Canada will have to ante up.
Secondly, the document basically says the “committee” will decide which science is sound and that will determine the actions that said committee will take in response to climate change. As an Engineer, I find this very disturbing. History is full of scientists who were not believed by various “committees” in power because their findings were not in line with the status quo.
Finally, this document states that all signing parties accept that climate change is real and needs to be addressed. As an Engineer, I have seen a lot more data refuting climate change than I have seen supporting it. In fact, the basis of the whole global warming movement, “The Mann Hockey Stick Graph”, has been refuted by a fellow Canadian, Steve McIntyre. Many sources of error in the global warming theory have been identified, yet the same old ideas and statements keep getting regurgitated as fact and anyone who questions them is ridiculed.
In closing, I realize that climate change is a political hot topic, but I believe that we, in Canada, can manage our own affairs without putting our future into the hands of a group that will not have our best interests at heart. Please remember that Canadians gave you the mandate to govern in the last election when your opponent Mr. Dion was running on his “Green Shift” platform. If Canadians were willing to be part of this type of funds transfer, we had the chance to vote for it in the last election.
Mr. Harper, I have faith in your government and I believe that you will be better able to do the right things for Canada without having your hands tied by a Treaty that does little more than transfer wealth from developed countries to developing countries. Please don’t sign this Treaty.
Respectfully,
Trevor
For all you Christian and also non-believers in the audience. A good read is “Money & Wealth in the New Millennium” by Norm Franz. He speaks to this very thing.
Globalization is coming and this “Climate Change” this is yet just another Hegelian dialectic used to take away our liberty and freedom.
For all of you who have downloaded the draft treaty it is easy to find out the scam at the heart of the treaty. Just search on the word billion. It comes up 4 times and all refer to the money the developed world is going to transfer yearly to the developing world.
It’s not about setting emissions targets it’s all about getting an enforceable wealth transfer treaty in place run by the UN.
The thought of a world government run by the unelected is way too frightening for words. The thought that keeps coming into my mind are acts of anarchy, ones that the world has never seen.
the “environmental refugee” like the Pali, or inner-city black to screwover the prosperous and give substandard morons(mo strung, banjomoon,) and their legions a purpose
Trevor,
That was a very good letter to the PM. Hopefully his office will receive many like it.
I agree, a very well written letter Trevor. I pray that the government listens to the people and not the fanatical activists.
off topic a little but how did that Warmen v the entire free world lawsuit business end up or is that still on going?
can’t find any recent links
You might call up your MP’s, and ask if they’ve read it.
Being an American, I don’t have MPs. I have two US Senators (Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein) and a Congresscreature (Anna Eshoo). I’m reasonably sure that Dianne Feinstein is the only one of them who can read. She doesn’t say the crazy things that Barbara Boxer does, but she votes exactly the same way, so I’m not sure that her ability to read helps me any.
Thank you Trevor, for wording this much more diplomatically than I could have. He or one of his associates will see this so I just want to express my support.
At the same time the media voices constantly refer (as if they knew anything) about “Copenhagen” and the importance of Canada (and the USA) “getting on board” or “not blocking” an agreement.
The more the “New World Order” tries to force their plan on the United States, the more Glen Beck looks like a viable candidate for POTUS.
I never would have dreamed that Copenhagen could actually be the precursor for the prophetical One World Government. Thanks for the informative alarm bells put out by SDA, Trevor, and the other commentators who have enlightened we of the unenlightened. It is a precise reminder of how outside control can subtly creep in, and we sure don’t need Canada to be subservient or on-the-hook for anything in these global shenanigans. Beware PM Stephen Harper, for something is indeed “rotten in Denmark”.
I still have faith in the US Senate not to ratify a protocol as flawed as this Kyoto2. Obama may sign on, but it still has to pass the Senate. In 1997 the Byrd-Hagel Bill passed by a fairly comfortable majority of 95-0. This was when Al Gore was presiding over the Senate as Vice president. This bill basically was a preemptive stike against Kyoto stating that any protocol serously damaging the US economy was unacceptable. Because of this bill, Clinton and Gore never submitted Kyoto to the Senate. The Senate has changed since 1997, but not to that extent. I certainly hope not.
Silicon Valley Jim, my deepest sympathies.
Thanks for posting this Kate. More people read sda, for news, than read Pablum in the newspapers. We all owe more than we could ever repay to Lord Moncton, Glenn Beck and to Kate.
Most sane people knew that the weather control thingie was a hoax from the get go – the Western Standard had the whole Power Corps/UN/France $$ for cheap oil scam with Saddam Hussein documented and reported…no one sued…so the elitists needed to get $$ to destroy freedom from somewhere…what better than ‘hot air’, sell hot air…brilliant if you can get the useful idiots to buy it!
My guess is that unka Mo probably had something to do with the bankruptcy of Ezra’s newspaper. Vengeance.
At what point are the sane, productive, democratic nations going to walk out of the UN and leave it to the corrupt, despicable and amoral members running the Orwellian-inspired committees, such as the Human Rights Committee run by the worst human rights violators on the planet? A Canadian government with the cojones to ditch UN membership would have my loyalty for life. A US government with cojones enough to expel the UN from American soil would likely inspire the loyalty of the majority of americans. Why are we letting the lunatic lefties ruin the most free, prosperous and advanced continent on Earth?
So how is this going to work?
We are going to increase the costs to business here through taxes and regulations which will result in the closure of the clean factories here and the production will be moved to new dirtier factories in China.
Chinese industry is more polluting per unit of production.
And we will ship raw materials there and the finished products back here.
So this treaty will increase real pollution and C02 emissions, not decrease them.
The choice for the environmentalists is clear, a shiny new world wealth redistribution scheme or a cleaner environment.
Pick one or the other.
“Thanks for posting this Kate. More people read sda, for news, than read Pablum in the newspapers. We all owe more than we could ever repay to Lord Moncton, Glenn Beck and to Kate.”
Posted by: Jema54 at October 30, 2009 9:14 PM
Seconded, jema 54!
PM Harper and Jim Prentice’s staff have been made aware of this issue on SDA as well as a few chosen high profile Canadian MSM journos, even if only as CC’s to the Glenn Beck program, as of this hour.
Climate Debt – Last 50 years of Foreign Aid -Peace Keeping Costs – UN Assessments – World Bank and IMF Funding – NGO Aid = ??
Just a thought on how one would counter the UNFCCC Treaty portion on Climate Reparations.
The Developing world has been getting pretty regular payments from the developed world for some time. This does of course not negate the potential dangers involved. I would just Advance some things that may make you wonder about Global Government.
Roles of Government
1) Civil Defense = UN Peace Keeping Forces
2) Financial Policy /Currency = World Bank + IMF
3) Foreign Trade = World Trade Organization
4) Laws and Courts = World Court/WTO
Each one by itself is thought of as benign and institutional required for globalization, combine them and you have a really good start on Global Government.
There was a very interesting interview earlier today on the Glen Beck show on this topic:
Monckton Interview – October 30, 2009
Copenhagen all the way. It is amazing what fear mongering the right wingers will do to protect big business and big money.
Justin? It dat youse usin only yer last intshel to spew your papa’s and unca Mo’s crap?