The Most Trusted Name In …

Political Animal 21 Comments

Give me a sec – I’ll think of something.

“CNN ran out of time and used me to “close” the debate with the pearls/diamonds question. Seconds later this girl comes up to me and says, “you gave our school a bad reputation.’ Well, I had to explain to her that every question from the audience was pre-planned and censored. That’s what the media does. See, the media chose what they wanted, not what the people or audience really wanted. That’s politics; that’s reality. So, if you want to read about real issues important to America–and the whole world, I suggest you pick up a copy of the Economist or the New York Times or some other independent source. If you want me to explain to you how the media works, I am more than happy to do so. But do not judge me or my integrity based on that question.”

RTWT at Gateway Pundit.
They call it the Clinton News Network for a reason.
More here and here – digging deep for those undecided voters!

21 Replies to “The Most Trusted Name In …”

  1. About One Billion $$$ worth of Time-Warner, CNN’s parent, is owned by the Saudi Royal Family. Hillary would be a good choice for Islamists, because she can be ‘influenced’. She also seems to lack a clear understanding of right from wrong. Hamas has already endorsed her.

  2. I suggest you pick up a copy of the Economist or the New York Times

    But somehow, they are not “the media” too?
    Sorry, pal, I lump them in with all the rest. It’s a rare day that the Economist doesn’t have photos of US soldiers with mushroom clouds looming in the background or some unflattering photo of GWB frowning or the like. The British Time/Newsweek fish wrap, oh pardon me, crumpet-wrap.

  3. You see, Clintons are low life, this is not meant to be an insult, they actually are. Actual real life, lowlife people, just happens to be the way others construct to destroy the American society; this is the others aim and Clintons are the all willing tool, sort of like mutual benefit society. The others want the power to run other peoples lives and Clintons are the people that like to be in position of power even though they are the puppets of the others. Have not figured who the others are yet.
    Had certain respect for the man and lost it as fast as the guy opened his mouth and bit his lip.
    Now you have to question the other people that support them. Not the regular people, they get sucked in by the likes of CNN, the in people, the groupie society as it were.
    As per CNN, it appears they have become a propaganda machine for some, somewhere.
    Clearly they support Clintons, though it seems not of becoming of a news organization.
    It just may be they are not, they could be a mouthpiece of a group of people, maybe, it comes to mind RICH SOCIALIST.
    Rich have become the foremost socialist due to the fact that they have all this wealth that they generally sucked out of the plebeians and in order to keep straight face, they tell how they should really be paying more taxes. The thing is that anybody that thinks that they are making too much money can decide to make less, and those that think they are not paying enough taxes are free to pay more or donate. I’m certainly willing to accept a sizable donation for my enjoyment and comfort. Not really, just going off the deep end here.
    On the other hand, perhaps this is just a Friday night ramble.

  5. CNN the Communists News Network the most untrusted name in cable news and we cant trsut any of those liars

  6. If Hellary Clinton becomes the next president, I predict the culture war will become violent and widespread. I also predict it is unlikely she will get to finish her first term.
    There are a lot of Americans who simply will not be able to live with such POS in the Ova Office taking away their money and freedoms in high gear.

  8. OFFTOPIC: Am I imaging things again?
    Does the latest, recent, repeated MSM pet subject of “end of the world” via Global Warming dovetail nicely with aging baby-boomers?
    As this generation realizes life’s eventuality, are they good targets for charlatans that promise a better future “for the children”?
    Aging (wealthy or not, inferred guilt can be powerful) boomers, made to feel apologetic about their “past sins of consumption”, are probably a good target for unscrupulous scams.
    Then again, maybe I’ve just gone off the rails of reality for a bit.

  9. I actually watched the debate – on and off – and I caught that diamonds vs. pearls question.
    I was suspicious that it might have been pre-planned because it was so similar to the “boxers versus briefs” question that Bill Clinton got so many years ago. The media replayed that one over and over again too – ostensibly to show us all how much Clinton was a “regular guy”.
    Back then, I was so unaware of what the media was really like. Today, nothing surprises me.

  11. Two points:
    1) CNN – the US version of CBC.
    2) At no time in any of these elections does HONESTY, ABILITY, and TRUSTWORTHINESS get mentioned. It’s always How much money did the Candidate raise. So, back to my original theory of “the best government that money can buy!”

  12. Maybe now the likes of Edwards, Obama et al will question the wisdom of not wanting to have Democrats debate on the Fox network. You won’t get that kind of crap on Fox – “fair and balanced”

  13. Bolshevik said: “You see, Clintons are low life, this is not meant to be an insult, they actually are. Actual real life, lowlife people, just happens to be the way others construct to destroy the American society; this is the others aim and Clintons are the all willing tool, sort of like mutual benefit society. The others want the power to run other peoples lives and Clintons are the people that like to be in position of power even though they are the puppets of the others. Have not figured who the others are yet.”
    Well I will totally agree with you that the Clintons are authentic “white trash”…southern Dem upstarts… unconnected to the established eastern American aristocracy….but they spent their lives butt snorkeling it and cutting throats for it to get power prestige and wealth.
    There is a lot of truth to what you are saying and it is really important that we realize the Clintons ( particularly Hillary) are marionettes for a malevolent establishment power consortium.
    There is a reason that the Clintons always have the big cash they need and have bought major influence in the Dem apparatus with the ability to always come up with big money when the party needed it…they are top flight fund raisers tappingg into the eastern establishment where the Dem party has been notoriously weak….there is a reason why the Clintons are always spouting the global village/global governance rhetoric…there is a reason Hillary was successful in NY just as there is a reason UN globalist politics play well in NY and find sufferance and funding there.
    My take is the Clintons were a couple of no name hillbillies with ambition who hooked up with the biggest power they could find….in the US this is the part of the ruling class banking establishment who populate and fund the UN CFR and Trilateral policy tanks. Primarily headed by the Rockefellers, their trusts and foundations, this is a cartel of American aristocracy which are the leading edge of “Transnational Progressiveism”.
    If Transnationalism sounds warm and fuzzy like most Dem policies , it’s not…it is about devolving the nation-state into a global governing structure….done by banking, trade and commerce agendas that erase national boarders and global regulating boards which bypass national sovereignty…ultimately it emotes a form of global economic feudalism run by a select banking/corporate/political elite…you can be damn sure the ambitious white trash Clintons want to be puppet emperors in that kind of a power grab.

  15. “The Media is self censored and right wing programmed.
    Posted by: ok4ua at November 17, 2007 1:17 PM ”
    Methinks this should be in the post below,ok4ua. You really should put it there.It would win hands down,coming from a person actually inflicted with BDS.

  16. In a thread where we have CNN stone cold on planted fluff questions, from the very mouth of the question asker herself, unsolicited and volunteered by her in fact, we get ok4ua wisdom that the MSM is right wing programmed.
    Making my point. If Iran nukes a whole f-ing city into a self-lit glass parking lot, and Amadinejihad comes out and dances the funky chicken on it while claiming victory, ok4ua is going to tell everyone who will listen that it was America’s fault and the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy made it happen.
    I rest my case. And a good thing too… it was getting pretty heavy.

  17. OK4U sez: “The Media is self censored and right wing programmed.”
    You’re delusional man! The MSM are propagandists for hire…they work for transnational interests and promote the politics of transnational progressiveism.
    Your blind partisanism makes you an ignorant flunkey of globalist predators.

  18. How are you “self-censored” AND “programmed” at the same time???? Or is this just leftard non-thinking?

  19. “The Media is self censored and right wing programmed.”
    Posted by: ok4ua at November 17, 2007 1:17 PM
    You posted on the wrong thread dude. The Bush Derangement Impersonation Contest thread is below this one.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation