Meaghan Walker Edward T. Coulter Champion Williams

I have resisted for some time writing about a certain obsessed “fan” of this site, primarily to deny her the attention she seeks. However, considering the influx of readers who were introduced to SDA via my interview last week with Peter Warren, and her “appearance” on his radio show by way of a somewhat libelous email that he read on-air, perhaps its time to bring new readers up to speed.
Who is Meaghan Walker-Williams? Good question. Though she writes and comments under a variety of “identities”, a google search on her real name will bring up this thread at the libertarian blog, No Treason. It’s lengthy, but the portrait of “MWW” is painted primarily in her own words. You can’t get better than that.
As you will glean from that discussion, Meaghan had been operating a site called “Blanked Out Times”, writing various diatribes and obvious libel under the psuedonym “Edward T. Bear”. When her identity was exposed she pulled the site, but not soon enough to avoid a solid whupping from the No-Treason folks.
Meaghan finally retreated to safer territory by, believe it or not – starting her own “No Treason” blog – devoted entirely to talking to and about No-Treason.com in a one woman rant spectacular.
She had had practice. For some months she had sought personal gratification in writing under a variety of names (including mine) at this site dedicated to SDA. Not satisfied with simply making posts, she also writes in her own comments section, agreeing with and congratulating herself.
One would think that commenting across the blogosphere into the wee hours of the morning, sending outraged emails to media and politicians, and running various “sockpuppet” blog sites is enough to keep one woman occupied, but no!
Meaghan Walker-Williams has now announced yet another– this one fixating on one of Canada’s best written and original blogs, Dust My Broom. Written by Darcey Jerrom, Shere Khan and Raskolnikov, they bring a mostly conservative-libertarian viewpoint to a variety of issues, including those relating to Indian and Metis culture and politics.
I should flesh this out a little. You see, Meaghan Walker-Williams is a self-declared Indian “activist”. But “activist” really doesn’t do her justice. You see, Meaghan determines on behalf of “her” people – nay, on behalf of North Americans of all races and recombinations – who is permitted to discuss aboriginal topics, and what views they may express. She is none other than the annointed, the one true keeper of the MWW Official Stamp Of Indian Authenticity And Approved Thought.
certified.jpg
No others need apply.
Which brings me, in a round about way, to the reason I decided to make this post. Last night, at her newly spawned “Dustmybroom2”, the following literary achievement appeared, albeit briefly ;

Dear Adrian/Raskolnikov/Kate’s Beard
Are you capable of making a single essay or comment that doesn’t have anything to do with Aboriginals and how much you despise your own people?
I’m just wondering.
Or are you just a One-Trick Pony for the Blogging Tories?
Seriously… why don’t you try it some time. Write a post, that doesn’t involve your contempt, rage and disgust at Aboriginal Peoples.
If you hate Indians so much… why do you spend so much time doing nothing but thinking about Indians, writing about indians, bashing indians?
For somebody who seems to so despise “identity politics”, you are postively enamoured with playing the “Right-Wing Blogging Injun” thing to the hilt.
Don’t you know it’s boring.
Or are you both still searching for identity Having decided to first discard your own heritage, and then piss and shit all over it as well, as often as you possibly can?
You do know that you are nothing but a “token” to these right-wingers…
That if you dared to challenge them on any subject, on any topic, they will drop you like a hot potatoe, and treat you, with exactly the same contempt that they are applauding you for your snipes and attacks at other indians.
You may have fooled yourself Raskolnikov, into believing that if you can just bash indians
enough, that you won’t be associated with the bad stereotypes of indians in the minds of your new found friends.
But no matter how much you scrub your skin, you will never get the smell of “Indian” off of it these people will never forget who you are… even if you have.

As I said earlier, her portrait is best painted in her own words.
So, the next time you read a comment by someone using the initials “MWW”, or “Ann Coulter of Canada” or “Drugcop” or “Edward T. Bear” or whatever new personality may yet await to claw its way to the surface – quoting me as saying that “Canada needs institutions to lock up the Indian activists” (or variations thereof), you’ll have a much better idea what sort of institution I’m referring to – and the type of Indian “activism” I’m talking about.

59 Replies to “Meaghan Walker Edward T. Coulter Champion Williams”

  1. Amid a sea of sour suds, this:
    “The charges the Faux Native rights Manatee made on Warren fits the legal definition indisputably.”
    Do they? Prove it.

  2. Nope. And I am familiar with the libel laws. So, unless all you can do is namecall (which I suspect is the case), provide some argument. So far, it’s just been the usual shrill accusations against people that rightists disagree with.

  3. Here’s the section of the CCC quoted:
    “298. (1) A defamatory libel is matter published, without lawful justification or excuse, that is likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing him to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or that is designed to insult the person of or concerning whom it is published.
    (2) A defamatory libel may be expressed directly or by insinuation or irony
    (a) in words legibly marked on any substance; or
    (b) by any object signifying a defamatory libel otherwise than by words.”
    You people have absolutely NO idea of the height of the bar with respect to this. A naive reader might even imagine that it applies to your comments here. “Matter…designed to insult the person.” Wow. Shut down the blogosphere, and while you’re at it, Usenet.
    The fact is that even civil libel is a pain to prove: criminal libel is damned near impossible, which explains the paucity of successful prosecutions under the latter.
    Truth is always a defence in libel, both civil and criminal. And while you’re researching the matter, go check out the jurisprudence around “fair comment.” Then come back with something intelligent to say, or at least informed. In the meantime, you’re making public fools of yourselves.

  4. The bar on people being plagued/stalked/harassed to the point of “injury” is high enough that a lawyer needs to be a pole vaulter to make it over. Character assassination is pretty much legal unless you have the bucks to grind it out in a court-room crapshoot. This is why Dan Rather was able to freely attempt to destroy a sitting president with a lie (and not a bullet) and why others with publically funded access to Canadian public opinion can prop up a corrupt government while openly denying balanced access for a viable alternative.

  5. “Some of that has included threats of physical violence.”
    On The Politic, MWW commented that she was coming back to BC and would have to pay me a visit, if BC’s other aboriginals didn’t do so first. Wonder how I should have taken that?

Navigation