Who’s the public and who’s the servant?
In 2005, Michael and Chantell Sackett bought a small property in an Idaho residential neighborhood, intending to build a home. Once construction began, the EPA decided without any notice that the plot was a “wetland” because it was near a lake. There is no water on the property…
Even though there are other houses between the Sackett’s one acre lot and the lake, the EPA ordered them to remove the fill and restore the “wetlands” or pay fines of up to $75,000 a day.
So, are American citizens entitled to due process, or is the EPA entitled to act as judge and jury? Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court weighed in with a unanimous ruling…


