Telegraph;
Consider the simple fact, drawn from the official temperature records of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, that for the years 1998-2005 global average temperature did not increase (there was actually a slight decrease, though not at a rate that differs significantly from zero).
Of course, little matters like data are irrelevant to the larger picture – for as the true believers frequently remind us: cold winters, warm winters, hot summers, cold summers, average summers, more tornados, fewer thunderstorms, heavy snowfall, cold snaps, chinooks, drought and heavy rainfall are all signs of the coming global climate apocollapse. It’s a point the Telegraph also notes;
In response to these facts, a global warming devotee will chuckle and say “how silly to judge climate change over such a short period”. Yet in the next breath, the same person will assure you that the 28-year-long period of warming which occurred between 1970 and 1998 constitutes a dangerous (and man-made) warming.
Indeed.
I’m reminded of this every time the local (or national) news breathlessly reports “breaking a record set in 1913” – often with added commentary that global climate specialists have warned that we “will see more of this”.
If global warming is truly a recent and accelerating phenomenon – why are these hottest/coldest/dryest/wettest records so old? Shouldn’t the majority of records broken be recent ones?