Program alert: The Allison Inquiry, live streaming From Ottawa
14 Replies to “Safe and Effective®”
How does the Allison Inquiry differentiate between true injuries from COVID vaccines, and physical ailments or deaths that occurred shortly after vaccination but were not caused by it?
In most cases, they can’t. The only solid way to determine the safety of a vaccine is to do large-scale statistical studies, preferably controlled and randomized, although cohort studies often have to serve. In individual cases, there rarely is a sure fire way to know if a vaccine caused an injury.
So take the Allison Inquiry with a grain of salt. Post hoc ergo propter hoc is a logical fallacy, not a creed.
Well you see, that is why we will never know how many people were killed outright by the COVID “vaccine” because many of them died in seniors homes and no autopsies performed. Like happened with my mother in law. Had a stroke and died two weeks after her “life-saving” booster. Almost looks like MAID in disguise.
They also had lots of ways to cover it up. One of the people testifying is a lawyer who represents Canadian Forces members and she is describing how no matter what anyone says people are not allowed to get their own records and executors of the estate of those who died are not about to get the records. Even in cases where the vaccine injury is obvious medically Canadian Forces reclassifies all vaccine injuries as due to mental health issues. It’s all a huge cover up.
We actually do, because there were many large scale studies on the safety of the vaccines. And most of these studies were done by independent medical research institutions from around the world.
No….we actually don’t. Because of the number of deaths that occurred without autopsies in seniors homes. They were not safe.
You’re going to make me post the enormous rodent wang link again, aren’t you.
Rat wangs of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your grotesquely humungous scrota!
They are very specifically ONLY accepting testimony from individuals whose vaccine injury has been medically documented as such.
And how did these doctors make this assessment? Except for a few types of injuries, there is no smoking gun that can conclusively show that the vaccine induced a given adverse effect.
Except for all those who died in seniors homes shortly after getting the “life saving vaccine”.
This is how I know you’re lying about having a math degree from U(W). Because if you weren’t, you’d have learned in your first year stats class that it’s entirely possible to determine that the frequency of adverse health events in a cohort after a specific point in time is statistically improbable.
And that is *all* that is required to declare a vaccine unsafe.
l wanna kill someone but dont know who.
lm compelled to take the mRNA jab in early 2022 and despite never any circulatory type
problems in 70 years l have a ministroke december 2024. so there is that.
good news is an MRA scan between xmas and new year shows nothing.
or maybe they lied to me? orders from on high? l dont trust ANYONE in ‘authority’ now.
I had five out of six of my family members (taking children and their spouses as my sample of six) who took the vaccine. Four of the six suffered real health issues around the time of their jab. None of the four health issues have been attributed to the vaccine. It’s all just a big unrelated coincidence. I’m sure the Marmot will be very happy to agree things like a healthy 38 year old woman with no risk factors and no past history of heart trouble who ends up in a cardiac care unit after her second shot is just a wild unproven coincidence because she ended up in the cardiac care unit 32 days after her jab and you can’t count anything more than 28 days as related. Them’s the rules. The killer marmot loves them rules.
How does the Allison Inquiry differentiate between true injuries from COVID vaccines, and physical ailments or deaths that occurred shortly after vaccination but were not caused by it?
In most cases, they can’t. The only solid way to determine the safety of a vaccine is to do large-scale statistical studies, preferably controlled and randomized, although cohort studies often have to serve. In individual cases, there rarely is a sure fire way to know if a vaccine caused an injury.
So take the Allison Inquiry with a grain of salt. Post hoc ergo propter hoc is a logical fallacy, not a creed.
Well you see, that is why we will never know how many people were killed outright by the COVID “vaccine” because many of them died in seniors homes and no autopsies performed. Like happened with my mother in law. Had a stroke and died two weeks after her “life-saving” booster. Almost looks like MAID in disguise.
They also had lots of ways to cover it up. One of the people testifying is a lawyer who represents Canadian Forces members and she is describing how no matter what anyone says people are not allowed to get their own records and executors of the estate of those who died are not about to get the records. Even in cases where the vaccine injury is obvious medically Canadian Forces reclassifies all vaccine injuries as due to mental health issues. It’s all a huge cover up.
We actually do, because there were many large scale studies on the safety of the vaccines. And most of these studies were done by independent medical research institutions from around the world.
No….we actually don’t. Because of the number of deaths that occurred without autopsies in seniors homes. They were not safe.
You’re going to make me post the enormous rodent wang link again, aren’t you.
Rat wangs of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your grotesquely humungous scrota!
They are very specifically ONLY accepting testimony from individuals whose vaccine injury has been medically documented as such.
And how did these doctors make this assessment? Except for a few types of injuries, there is no smoking gun that can conclusively show that the vaccine induced a given adverse effect.
Except for all those who died in seniors homes shortly after getting the “life saving vaccine”.
This is how I know you’re lying about having a math degree from U(W). Because if you weren’t, you’d have learned in your first year stats class that it’s entirely possible to determine that the frequency of adverse health events in a cohort after a specific point in time is statistically improbable.
And that is *all* that is required to declare a vaccine unsafe.
l wanna kill someone but dont know who.
lm compelled to take the mRNA jab in early 2022 and despite never any circulatory type
problems in 70 years l have a ministroke december 2024. so there is that.
good news is an MRA scan between xmas and new year shows nothing.
or maybe they lied to me? orders from on high? l dont trust ANYONE in ‘authority’ now.
I had five out of six of my family members (taking children and their spouses as my sample of six) who took the vaccine. Four of the six suffered real health issues around the time of their jab. None of the four health issues have been attributed to the vaccine. It’s all just a big unrelated coincidence. I’m sure the Marmot will be very happy to agree things like a healthy 38 year old woman with no risk factors and no past history of heart trouble who ends up in a cardiac care unit after her second shot is just a wild unproven coincidence because she ended up in the cardiac care unit 32 days after her jab and you can’t count anything more than 28 days as related. Them’s the rules. The killer marmot loves them rules.
Actually there is a substantial control group. Given the scope of of the tragedy and the amount money that changed hands there will be no accountability nor government or industry investigation. 75 years from now it will earn the status of the Salem Witch trials on a much grander scale. Most of us will be long gone. It is easier to fool people than convince them they were fooled. Here is an explanation why. https://www.shortform.com/podcast/episode/the-jordan-b-peterson-podcast-2025-06-05-episode-summary-553-why-do-smart-people-double-down-on-bad-ideas-dr-gad-saad