41 Replies to “Pollspotting!”

  1. I don’t know the current Pandemic areas right now.
    And someone with a gun will abide by our governments zones?
    Wish I had the great dope our politicians have been smoking.

    1. Oh please, they don’t want you to abide. They want you to submit and give it all up or to defy them so they can kill you.

      Allowing municipalities to regulate handguns means a country wide ban. Anyone familiar with the current rules will understand that. Effectively to keep your handguns you will need to have the residence, range and service within the same municipality and you have to be lucky that this municipality does not ban them. Remember, under current rules you have to be an active shooter practicing at the range you have a membership with in order to keep the handguns in the first place. It is a country wide ban, period.

      I am so glad that so many here took a stand for moral purity last election, PM Trust Fund could not have done it without you.

        1. Great job SK, someone has some functioning braincells somewhere!
          Not holding my breath for Morontario to do the same.

  2. As has been seen in Portland, Seattle and Minneapolis recently and other areas of America in the past, no government should have the power to prevent a law abiding citizen from attaining the power to self-defend. In Canada we have been delinquent in defending our fundamental right of self defense, all in the name of public safety. As has been displayed numerous times the government cannot protect us. The politicians that demand we adhere to laws that have been implemented, supposedly for our own good, cannot even establish what an assault weapon is. We have been led down the garden path by an effort perpetrated by the Liberals that guns are dangerous. The only danger in Canada is Liberal governments!!!!!

    1. No, they are not the only danger.

      The Endies and Greenies are every bit as dangerous, and then some.

  3. I heard the PrancingPrincess on TV today. Lamenting the danger of snipers. I agree. It is difficult to go to the SuperStore now. My head is on a constant swivel, on the lookout for those well hidden sniper posts. I makes for dangerous driving.

  4. Indeed. It is difficult being a Conservative with liberals and woke lefties always sniping at you.

    1. The only sniping I’ve had to contend with lately is from karens and kevins who bark at me about not wearing a mask properly.

    1. Liebrawls never seem to understand the basic facts.

      Criminals DONT OBEY LAWS.

      Proposals like this only penalize normies, that respect the law, and respect their guns, and their use. Chines and East Indian gangs don’t give a feck!

      LIEBrawls are Cunned stunts!

      1. They do understand the basic facts: But they can’t do anything about criminals because it’s too hard, and won’t work, unless it does work but then it will look like those mean right-wingers were right all along. Still, “Something must be done.” They might as well punish their natural opponents while they are at it.

        For Liberals, crime is not really the problem, it’s an opportunity.

        1. They don’t want to do anything about criminals. Criminals are their most useful allies. Criminals give them an excuse to grab guns from law abiding. When will people understand that?

    2. colon R~4, thanks to “People” like you the cucksevatives will always remain useless tits, just like you

      1. Yeah whatever, keep telling yourself you’re more than just Blackie’s useful idiot, sure you are.

    1. Well I guess in a way we are safe from soldiers in the streets, since Canada cannot induce enough volunteers to enlist to maintain a semblance of Armed Forces. Kind of oxymoronic, the Liberals want to remove firearms from the general population but at the same time cannot maintain a functioning National Police Force, Army, Airforce, or Navy. Oh! Canaduh!

  7. “Should the federal government allow municipalities to ban handguns through bylaws restricting the possession, storage, and transportation?”

    Yes, absolutely. There is no valid reason to own or be in possession of a firearm at anytime in Canada. None whatsoever. Nope – confiscate them all, no questions asked. Anyone caught with a restricted firearm or hell, any firearm for that matter should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
    As a matter of fact…to hell with the law and all that messy stuff, throw them in the gulag and be done with it.

    That’s my imitation of a lemming – how did I do?

    1. A solid B+.
      Next time, throw in “no one needs a gun” or, my personal favourite, “I don’t believe in guns” and that A is in the bag. For an A+, you’ll have to cite irrelevant US stats.

      1. Sorry only a B-; you left out the part where anyone who doesn’t understand legal handgun owners are the “problem,” not stolen handguns crossing the US border bought by gang bangers – is an ignorant racist for daring to use facts and data.

    2. Pretty good, in addition to what Kathryn said, you should also explain that violent crime is a social construct while everyone who owns a gun is a potential murderer.

    3. *
      “allow municipalities to ban handguns”

      and what’s next on pm care bear’s list?
      smoking cigars, skydiving… dating across
      the gender divide?

      what else does the celebutant pm get
      to decide for you?

      *

    4. There is no valid reason to own or be in possession of a firearm at anytime in Canada.

      One of my relatives used to be a police officer. Some time ago, we had a discussion in which the High River gun grab came up. He supported the actions of the Mounties, citing that as justification.

      Comments like that are the reason I haven’t spoken with him for nearly 2 months.

  8. I voted no..But then I thought better of it.
    Yes.
    Municipalities should take over all federal responsibilities..such as tax collection,law enforcement and welfare.
    That way the fools are right at hand when they get out of line.
    And the cheats,bludgers and I don’t wanna works can all be exposed.
    So much of the systemic corruption in Canada is orchestrated via Federal Grants and the threat of their being with held.
    In fact our taxes should be remitted locally and only 10% maximum should be passed on to the Provincial Government,who can pass only 10% of their take on to the Feds..
    Then just to cap it off,taxes shall be voluntary.
    That “Temporary Income Tax” to pay for the First World War,imposed 1917,,the start of the real big lies.
    Also is proof that government will never stop stealing,unless forced to do so.
    Would be a great way to take a really stupid idea of the Assault Style Parasites and run it right up ’em.
    Sure Municipalities will take over gun control and everything else you useless federal twits are supposed to be doing.

    1. They just want to add municipalities as another layer of tyranny on existing Federal laws, not replace them.

  9. No, Hell No
    The Elitism on display from the Shiny Pony is disgusting.
    Why should the Emperor have to deal with the problems of the little people?
    The delegation of Responsibility, Law by Bylaw rather than from Parliment is the perfect introduction to
    our new Rulers the Commissars… Mayors, Superintendants, Health Dept. Managers etc, etc..
    The Ruling Elite are not responsible for the crimes of the Commissars, whatever crimes they commit
    was never the intention of Dear Leader who promises to punish those abusing his power
    as long as he isn’t an important someones favorite nephew.
    This shirking of responsibility by all levels of government has to stop before it mutates into its true Ideological Doctrine.
    COMMUNISM

    Ps.. We never voted for rule by bureaucracy.

  10. If they’re prepared to remove firearms ownership from the Criminal Code of Canada, then I MIGHT be prepared to support allowing municipalities to have a say. Otherwise, they can sod off.

  11. Municipalities are provincial jurisdiction. Handgun storage laws enforced by bylaw enforcement officers? Are we then going to arm the bylaw enforcement officers? At what point do the cops get involved? This is going to be such a patchwork of laws it will be unenforceable.

    1. Bylaw officers in Penticton wear bullet proof vests. I have been wondering if they carry or have had firearm training in anticipation of carry.

  12. chi com owns WHO… by extension does chi com own the U.N…. u. n. mandates civil disarming the peons…. so is it the chi coms behind this shit?? check out china joes new gun legislation!

  14. Baah, don’t worry. Pinky Otool and his crew of stalwarts will fight tooth and nail against any further erosion of our firearms rights!

    Suggestions that Pinky & Co. seek and rely on the effete, squat-to-pee vote are completely unfounded!

  15. Passing the buck on to somebody else to make a decision.
    Avoiding taking responsibility. It’s what girly-boys do.

  16. The House of Commons has only 55 days of sitting before the summer break. There is no way that they can introduce this legislation, have first reading, then committees, 2nd reading, 3rd reading, vote to pass, to senate, 1st reading, committees, 2nd reading, 3rd reading, vote on amendments in all of this, final vote, GovGen signs it, goes to Gazette, all in 55 sitting days for the HOC and Senate. Won’t happen. Then if Justin the Stupid calls an election, it dies on the order paper. Then if it passes, the Gun rights advocacy ask the SCOC for an injunction against the law as being unconstitutional. Canadians do have property rights, because if they didn’t the laws against theft and fraud etc wouldn’t be valid. How can you steal something that nobody legally owns.

    1. How can you steal something that nobody legally owns.

      Repeat after Schwab: “In 10 years time, you will own nothing and you will be happy.” I take it, then, that theft will become obsolete.

  17. I’m not suggesting that it won’t happen, just countering the argument that we don’t have property rights in Canada. But if they adopt the OBAMA “you didn’t build that” idea, we could lose everything. The Supreme Court does not have the final say. A disarmed populace and a tyrannical gov’t has the final say. See: China, N Korea, Bolshevik Russia, Nazi Germany, Venezuela, etc.
    1Sam8: God warns Israel through Samuel what a King like their neighbors would do to them. It is exactly what our elected governments are doing today.

  18. IANAL…but wouldn’t a handgun bylaw trench on the criminal law and be ultra vires under s. 91?

    Not that I imagine it would matter.

  19. Let’s be truthful.

    This is an issue Trudeau always keeps in a back pocket for when he needs to change the channel. He doesn’t want Canadians focusing on his abject failure regarding Covid vaccines, so he throws in this always contentious but completely unwarranted gun issue.

    And Canadians – urban Canadians – lap it up. The government’s job after all, is to protect us from everything all the time. Except for Covid, because that’s hard.

    1. “He doesn’t want Canadians focusing on his abject failure regarding Covid vaccines, so he throws in this always contentious but completely unwarranted gun issue.”

      The tit doesn’t even have to do that. For the last several years a majority of Canadians have been fixated on CNN, seemingly oblivious to the sleaze and corruption in their own backyard.

      And instead of barking, Pinky Otool is curled up, whimpering under the bed.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation