29 Replies to “They Took All The Rights, Put ‘Em A Rights Museum”

    1. I have my response planned for my upcoming trial. Will take in generous portions of cattle manure, dump it all over said Commissioner and tell em, since you cant recognize BS I brought you some

  2. “enacted stigma”
    “effective altruism”
    “altruistic filicide”

    Who speaks like this? Yeah … psycho leftists who desperately need to invent an alternate reality.

  4. The HRCs are the alphabet people’s outsourced cowardice as sacred property of the state and its lawyer-rent-seeker equivalent of Mao’s shaming sessions replacing the beatings with outrageous monetary penalties and drawn out show trial format. No self-respecting citizen should tolerate such state-thuggery. It is a confirmation of the fatally compromised failure of a nominally “Conservative” government that this still exists. Free speech and free markets are not anarchy, they are morality.

  5. It’s against the law to deface it in the unlikely event that your tires spin a bit at the intersection while “launching”.
    It’s very likely to be against the law to spill coffee on it as well. intentional or not.
    and at some point it will be against the law to disagree with this..
    George Orwell, “if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever”
    1984

    1. Did you look at the imagery of said crosswalk? A white line on either side to convey the notion that straight couples are needed to keep the others ‘in line’. Sexism! Homophobia!
      Put down over black pavement to say it is OK to walk over melanin blessed people. Racism!

  7. “Day 4 of the Human Rights Commission hearing for Benita Pedersen, who distributed flyers…”

    It is at this point that I start wanting to know the cost of all this, and whose Iron Rice Bowl needs to be broken. Four days and counting for the crime of… well nothing, really. Handing out flyers is PROTECTED SPEECH in Canada. Anyone can do it.

    Except not always I guess, because some animals are more equal than others.

  9. So the townsfolk voted to remove the sidewalk….but leftist activists are always the ones claiming to “defend democracy?”

  11. The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms won this AM…
    https://www.jccf.ca/major-victory-for-free-expression-on-campus-court-quashes-university-of-lethbridge-lecture-cancellation/?

    “The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Alberta Court of King’s Bench has quashed the University of Lethbridge’s decision to cancel a campus lecture by Dr. Frances Widdowson, marking a major victory for freedom of expression on university campuses. The Court found that the university erred in law by failing to consider the Charter-protected freedom of expression, calling its decision “fundamentally and fatally flawed.”

    The case arose after the university cancelled Dr. Widdowson’s February 1, 2023, lecture, “How Woke-ism Threatens Academic Freedom.” Philosophy professor Dr. Paul Viminitz had invited her to speak, and the university had approved the event. After receiving demands from some faculty, students, alumni, and members of the public to cancel the lecture, university president Mike Mahon reversed course and cancelled the event, citing concerns about potential harm to members of the campus community.

    Dr. Widdowson is a former tenured professor at Mount Royal University, where she taught in the Department of Economics, Justice, and Policy Studies until her position was terminated in late 2021. ”

    and…

    “Justice Simard wrote that “the facts of this case fall squarely” within binding Supreme Court of Canada precedent.”

  12. The continued existence of a kangaroo court like this in what is purportedly Canada’s version of Montana does not bode well for Separation.

  13. Why does she call them “ gender activists”? They are dangerous human rights violators trying to take her right to speak, and to be heard.

  14. “Why does she call them “ gender activists”?”

    You have to call them something, and that’s what they call themselves, so I guess Sheila is just running with it.

    Problem being of course that “gender activist” isn’t a meaningful word combination in English. It’s gibberish. And it is deliberately gibberish, because if people knew what they were really after, it wouldn’t be going well for them.

    2. It’s like calling communist East Germany the “ German Democratic Republic” the name is meant to deceive.

    1. “…but I have met Benita…”

      Crazy people have rights too. I mean, just look at the fruitbats trying to get her in the Human Rights Commission for daring to oppose the rainbow crosswalk. They’re frigging nuts.

      And you know, maybe she’s not crazy. Maybe she’s just early.

  17. L – “Political commissar [політичний комісар; politychnyi komisar]. The political representative of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the Soviet Army. Political commissars began to be appointed at the higher levels of the army in 1918 and at units smaller than a battalion (where they were called politruky) at the end of 1919. These officers came under the chief political administrations of the army and navy, and functioned as representatives of the Communist Party conducting propaganda and ensuring that Party policy was followed.”
    ———————————————————————————————————————————–
    There is a marked difference between the concept of Rights: Creator endowed, Natural Rights, inalienable, individual, the birthright of all and transcendent. Created with agency and thus responsibility for choices, both good and bad. Having the foundational principles the of British Common-Law.

    Versus: The Cult. Marxist idea of “group rights” granted in the service of the government, by the government and capriciously/arbitrarily so. Select groups are designated oppressed by… and thus with neither moral agency, nor responsibility. Wherein all depends on the opinion and will of the Kommisar.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation