“Vigilamus pro te”

A CAF juxtapose of sorts.

Brian Lilley: This wasn’t respectful to the troops, don’t think it followed protocol. Problem is, Carney doesn’t know this.

More military mystery…

The officer commanding one of the Canadian Army’s leading regular force battalions and the unit’s top non-commissioned officer have been removed from their position. Lt.-Col. Jason Hudson and Chief Warrant Officer Kim Doerr, of the 3rd Battalion, Princess Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry, based in Edmonton, were apparently forced to step aside over the weekend, several military sources said Tuesday.

The Department of National Defence, in a written statement, confirmed to CBC News that action had taken place, but refused to explain why.

Reddit reveals: “Beers on a bus”

15 Replies to ““Vigilamus pro te””

    1. These guys are hoding a rifle with a bayonet at arms lenght. No chit chat, it’s not an inspection. You walk on by, and if you know how you might be bothered to retun the salute.

      1. Commonwealth rules. You don’t salute without a hat. He actually did an appropriate salute without a hat, briefly coming to attention. Mind you it did look like he was doing Mussolini style preening.

  1. Perhaps the CO and the Chief were not enthusiastic enough about culture change. Failed to hold a LGBTQ flag raising ceremony? No tampons in the men’s washroom? Who knows. In all honesty, it’s a big deal at the unit level. Remains to be seen if the reasons are serious and they could be. Or it might just be politics and sacking the ideologically undesirables. A few years back a man slated to command a Wing (a full Colonel polition) was held back because he attended a call sign (for pilots) event where one of the protected classes (a lesbian?) was given a proposed call sign that was deemed to be offensive. The whole Air Force chain of Command fell in step and treated this as if high treason had been committed. Ruined career right there. They could have just resolved this silliness quietly, but they chose to make an example for the sake of politics. Never did find out what the call sign was. Every one acted like just uttering the word was an act of undescribable obscenity.

    1. translation from google: “We are watching over you, foolish leader.”
      indeed. watching over the one who CONTROLS THE PURSE STRINGS.
      and sets the transgender agenda imposed on said military.

      for a while l cautioned every one of my friends kids to reconsider a military career because they could find themselves in a position of being given an unlawful order.
      if they dont, they are court marshalled, sent to the brig, demoted, etc.
      if they do and it gets in the news, they get expelled from the military,
      subjected to charges in civilian court etc.
      sol’n? stay the H-E-HOCKEY STICKS out of the Cdn military.

  2. Was it disrespectful?

    There is a means test

    If what was done is similar to say a pirouette behind HRH then it’s disrespectful.

    More and more the similarities between PET and Carney become ominously similar.

  3. ah. ok. the missing salute. so civvies under specific circumstances are expected to ‘join in’ military traditions. and expected to *know* this even if for instance, they have no military experience and those *in the know* remain silent. as has been pointed out. got it.
    what remains a mystery is the supposed connection with the suspensions of some brass.
    what does *that* have to do with Carnage’s rudeness?

  4. L – The purpose of a military in a nation-state is to protect it and the citizenry from enemies foreign and domestic. In a Trudeau/Carney post nation-state, any military still holding “true patriot love” in their hearts and loyalty to their oath of allegiance are only in the way.

    Their C.A.F. duty/right not to obey illegal orders is a liability to P.M. Carney’s “New World Order”; under which the concept of an illegal order does not exist. Transcendent moral law and duty to citizens, individual human beings do not exist, either. The only recognized ultimate value globalist politicians(post-modernism) believe in is power. In previous centuries, they risked being labelled tyrants; but not now, as the World Economic Forum provides much better public relations.

    Ideas matter, history matters… to be continued

Leave a Reply

Navigation