41 Replies to “March 5, 2026: Reader Tips”

    2. CBC. the luddites of 2026.
      sell the assets, the best outcome and PROOF of its worth.
      are you listening PP? PP? say something. enough sloganeering.

  2. Y’know, I don’t know why it took me so long to put this together, but it finally occured to me that the Westerners backing the former Iranian leaders, who were in turn backing and supplying the Russian war effort in Ukraine, are literally the same people pushing to back Zelensky against the Russians.

    But we on the right are the warhawks.

    1. Its all a money laundering operation to funnel back to the Democratic party so they can steal elections.

      Ukraine has been good for business.

      1. Exactly right. The first clue was the DeepState/CIA-driven weeks long, wall-to-wall, insane, over-the-top, inescapable agitprop media coverage of the conflict after it commenced.

    2. What’s a winning strategy (when you don’t have the power to assert your will yourself)?
      Play both sides against each other and profit off the conflict.
      It’s an old gambit. You know: Chaos Strategy.

  7. Hawaii 5-0 … appointment TV in my youut
    ‘Book-im Dano … murder one’
    Kam Fong as Chin Ho … hahahah ha ha …
    … still makes me laugh to this day.

      2. And, the best advertising for FOMOCO, with the plentiful supply of Galaxies and LTDs!
        The era of land yachts.

        1. The LTD grille said … You’ve ARRIVED baby!
          Hahahaha ha ha …

          But I’ll still take our 1970 Olds Cutlass 442

  10. National Post headline this morning:

    ‘He came at me and started stabbing.’ Canada has a serious knife problem

    And here I was, thinking all along that we had a serious violent arsehole problem.

    1. I usually read the police news releases at least once a week for a number of cities and areas in Canada, and when I see charges for those who have stabbed people, overwhelmingly I cannot pronounce the name.

      It was really nice of the author to only use names I can easily pronounce!

    1. I hope and pray the liberals get a massive majority as it would be a phenomenal boost to Alberta’s secessionists!!!

    3. Léger is one of the worst pollsters for bias.
      Push Poll. Their business is propaganda, paid for by the Federal government.

  16. Oh…oh…will you look at that!
    https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/iran-us-israel-conflict-2026/card/ship-insurers-willing-to-work-with-trump-on-hormuz
    You’ll have to look it up, addy was an essay and it’s behind a paywall. It’s from today.

    This was from 3 days ago:
    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/mar/02/maritime-insurers-war-risk-cover-gulf-iran-shipping-strait-of-hormuz

    Which caused my President to say that we would be providing shipping insurance as well as naval escort…is somebody blinking? It is a lot of money after all.

    Lloyd’s has done this sort of thing before:
    https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/international/2022/03/11/657813.htm

    Which caused: “Russian National Reinsurance Co., or RNRC, backstops three Moscow-based firms that provide a chunk of insurance for tankers moving the country’s oil against spills and collisions through the Danish and Turkish straits. Estonian authorities also found that a Cameroonian insurer and a Kyrgyz firm covered at least two tankers each.”
    The more you know.

    1. Jane, your comment is very interesting. It reminded me that Promethean Updates is now in my YouTube feed: https://www.youtube.com/@PrometheanAction/videos

      In this series of videos, two older American women frequently talk about the Elites of London controlling the world order and that Trump is breaking their grip on power. No one else ever seems to mention this “theory” but your post suggests that it may very well be true.

      1. I don’t know about that, but there is a lot of money and collateral control going on with shipping insurance. Quite a lot of it goes through Lloyd’s/London. Control the movement of a vital resource like energy and you control the world, really.
        I’ll have to check it out; seems interesting. Thank you.

        Now, why they would want to throttle the Gulf States as well as Asia and Europe (the sellers and buyers of the majority of that energy) does indeed create a big question mark. And they have done this with Russia already, which also is interesting.
        Remember what Rubio said during that speech at the Security conference: de-industrialization was a choice…cutting off energy supply would do that, now wouldn’t it?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation