Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
All the pictures in the article are…women.
Co(n)vert Moslem women?
Maybe they should just go straight to MAID.
Just tell them that plastic bags are masks. No “mai” required.
Think of it as a touch of Chlorine in the gene pool.
I kinda figured that some would develop a psychological dependence on masking when it became de rigeur in 2020. It plays into too many obsessions and paranoias over germs.
You “kinda figured” that. Just like all the Pee reviewed papers you cite “kinda figure” all kinds of shit funded by pharma.
Oh, and what was your defense of 70 vaccines for little kids?
What’s your defense for being an idiot?
Hey SDA schoolmarm, what’s with the personal insult. Shame on you.
Do you have a better word for someone who claims that little kids have to get 70 vaccinations? The total number (some shots, some oral) recommended by Health Canada for children six or under is around 15.
https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/healthy-living/canadian-immunization-guide-part-1-key-immunization-information/page-13-recommended-immunization-schedules.html
Either Stevie is making crap up, or he’s believing bad acters without checking for himself. Either way, he’s spraying around misinformation on a serious topic.
Well, Marmot, I guess the CDC is the source of misinformation…. or they are bad actors?
How many vaccines does the CDC recommend for children today? Take a guess. By my count, if you combine vaccines currently given to children from 0 – 15 months with those given to children 18 months to 18 years (see the CDC Schedule, as of August 7, 2025), the number is over 70.
By the way, my wife says that I am not an idiot, and she is always right. Have a nice day.
Canadian blog. You should have specified locale, because Western Canada tends to be the primary focus here.
C Miner,
Fair point. I should have been more specific, which is why I added the source.
That said, and with due respect, I know this is a Canadian blog, being a western Canuck.
As for Western Canada being SDA’s primary focus, I would say that is arguable.
I am glad that it is a focus, but just look at the posts today about Epstein, Tulsi, etc, and consider this great site to be focused on a wider, informative context.
Happy Solstice.
The CDC recommends a lot, but still far short of 70.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html
And your definition of “little kids” extends to 18 years old.
OK, Marmot. You prevaricate and win. Feel better?
You saw that I didn’t make crap up, but feebly counter with my definition of little kids goes to 18.
These days, 18 year olds are still little kids. I live in a neighbourhood rife with such kids.
And you conceded but denied what the CDC said.
Yet, in the spirit of these Christmas days, I will not call you an obtuse idiot.
Peace,
You picked a fight. Now you’re feeling sorry for yourself.
Next time stay on topic and be respectful.
The goof gets the last woof,
Respect is not calling someone an idiot. And I was on topic from a broader perspective.
I recall that respectful conversation is something you have insisted on.
And I didn’t “pick a fight,” I was merely engaging in conversation on opposing views, like you do.
Merry Christmas.
You post crap like that, I’m going to respond in kind. Next time, be polite.
The surgical team in the OR wear masks to protect the patient undergoing surgery. Masks do not protect the wearer, they protect others from any virus or germ laden exhalation the wearer may make. Certainly in the case of COVID, the virus cells are so small as to easily pass through the mesh of any reasonably obtainable mask. It’s like trying to use a picket fence to contain mosquitoes.
Ginger WRONG, surgeons wear masks in case they hit a wrong artery, and get sprayed with blood, mask prevents blood from entering mouth or nostrils, also masks prevent saliva, skin cells, or other ‘debris’ from raining into the open wounds, and thusly protecting the surgeon and hospital from law suits
Dont work so hard to display your ignorance.
That’s not work, that’s masturbatory ecstasy. I admit it’s hard to tell them apart, what with all the grunting.
“…surgeons wear masks in case they hit a wrong artery…”
Dude, could be be any dumber?
Well, not viruses etc, they’re too small, but certainly from saliva drops.
Ginger, from the Royal College of Surgeons on Neil Orr, Consultant Surgeon:
“He challenged the use of surgical masks in the operating theatre and published a controversial paper in the Annals, showing that over a six-month period when all operations in one theatre were performed without the surgeon wearing a mask there was no increase in infection (‘Is a mask necessary in the operating theatre?’ Ann R Coll Surg Eng. 1981 Nov;63[6]:390-2). This led to considerable debate and controversy, but time has shown that masks are not essential for most procedures.
https://livesonline.rcseng.ac.uk/client/en_GB/lives/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ASSET$002f0$002fSD_ASSET:374373/one?qu=%22rcs%3A+E002190%22&rt=false%7C%7C%7CIDENTIFIER%7C%7C%7CResource+Identifier
We have a very pricey, local, boutique grocery store here in town. I popped in the other day and was shocked to see every single one of their employees masked up. Why? Ohhhhhh yeahhhh … the MSM is banging on about a SUPERFLU roaring across our nation.
It sends the simple message … people are dangerous disease carrying parasites who can KILL you DEAD for breathing on you. Nevermind the efficacy of masks … at least people are TRYING not to die, Right?
And there’s no way to convince them that an N-95 will not prevent a virus getting through even though the manufacturers say it won’t.
Mentally deranged, ignorant and stupid is the COVID retard trifecta.
Waaay too long a story about a bunch of neurotics.
“Waaay too long a story about a bunch of neurotics.”
Yes…and how many of these people who died took the ‘vaccine’ that they were convinced would protect them? Who says that the mRNA experiment didn’t kill them, and not Covid?
Mask wearers are preparing to become muzzies?
I suspect that 97.6% of the mask wearers also believe white people should give the land back to the natives. Probably right up until they become homeless … living like a nomadic native … carrying their house with them in a shopping cart.
I don’t see the downside to this. Easy marking of lunatics without effort. I get to make their blood pressure rise without effort by not wearing a mask. Alerts pedestrians and drivers to someone intellectually impaired thus requiring increased attention to avoid mishaps.
“ Easy marking of lunatics without effort. “
EXACTLY. I prefer that these mental patients (99.998% liberals) identify themselves like this. This way I know to STEER CLEAR!
By their fear ye shall know them.
L – + + +
Their fears are what make them feel alive.
This is what happens to the Godless.
Darwin awards should have this as a category.
Since nobody talks about the effects of long term mask wearing (limited oxygen, nasty fibers in the respiratory system, fungus growing in the mask) then I guess they are not problems.
Darwin awards, indeed.
A psych friend offers his idea – about a third of women these days suffer from some form of depression and/or self-esteem issues, and masking allows them to hide themselves while in public. Keeping that barrier between themselves and the world gives them a bit of security.
Personally, I like the masks because I can commit felonies out in public and get away.
Psyop. Again.
Anyone else notice the flu is super-duper fatal again this year? They’re pushing it to see if they can stampede the Normies like they did in 2020/21.
If there are a few fruitbats out there masking full-time, I wish them luck with their increased CO2, increased breathing effort and decreased lung capacity. Yes, wearing a mask does come with unwanted and unhealthy side effects, particularly if you do it full-time long-term.